Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesProfessional AV

Distributed vs. Centralized Baggage Handling Systems

In airport baggage handling, time is everything. Efficiently transporting bags at check-in and arrival is imperative for any airline. Ultimately, baggage handling must optimally organize operations to meet time constraints and ensure a good passenger experience. In most cases, there are two types of baggage handling systems—distributed and centralized. Centralized systems are the most prevalent…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Professional AV teams put it to work with Customer Stories & Case Studies.

Share
Distributed vs. Centralized Baggage Handling Systems

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Professional AV?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Professional AV coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

In airport baggage handling, time is everything. Efficiently transporting bags at check-in and arrival is imperative for any airline. Ultimately, baggage handling must optimally organize operations to meet time constraints and ensure a good passenger experience.

In most cases, there are two types of baggage handling systems—distributed and centralized. Centralized systems are the most prevalent type. Distributed systems work differently and come with their own share of benefits. But which is better?

How Distributed and Centralized Baggage Handling Systems Work

A distributed system has different levels, but, at its highest capacity, all field devices (motor control panels, encoders, variable frequency drives, etc.) communicate back to a PLC (programmable logic controller). The difference, then, in a centralized system is that all fields hardwire back to the MCP (main control panel).

Another key distinction between the two systems is proximity. Distributed systems have all appropriate equipment in one area, while centralized systems require conduits to power the conveyors and communicate to the individual devices.

Distributed Baggage Systems Offer Visibility, Proximity, and More Reliable Uptime

A distributed bagging system is also easier to diagnose when something goes wrong. In these moments, the clock is ticking, and time is money in the airline industry.

With a distributed system, the associated functions for a piece of equipment are in the same area, such as power supply and controls, which are found right on the machine. Should a failure arise, operators can identify the problem quickly without losing time in the diagnostic phase.

For example, if a power roll bed is not working, you can look at the VFD (variable frequency drive) and power supply and rapidly deduce the problem. This speed to diagnosis ensures that there is minimal downtime.

A distributed system offers visibility. You have full knowledge of where all the parts and pieces are and how they work together. This type of system provides a clear advantage when it comes to time-critical activities.

While a distributed system typically requires a higher upfront investment than a centralized system, it reduces labor needs, is easier to install, and delivers more uptime to repay that additional cost over the life of the system.

Centralized Systems Are More Common and Require More Conduits

Centralized systems are the most common type in baggage handling. They are more affordable upfront than distributed systems, but the total cost of ownership (TCO) is often higher.

For example, a piece of conveyor from a centralized system may sit 165 feet from the control panel that requires a power supply, a motor, and four proximity switches. This setup would need three to four conduits, each running 165 feet from conveyor to control panel. In contrast, a distributed system would only need one IP67 VFD, which mounts to the side of the conveyor using only one cable to deliver power.

Preventing Downtime and Future-Proofing Should Be a Priority

When choosing a baggage handling system, many don’t consider downtime prevention as a cost justification. Nor do they look at future-proofing operations. Making these things priorities for a system aligns with choosing a distributed system.

Distributed systems are plug-and-play. Everything is arrangeable in any flow—think of it as you would Lego. When you want to alter the layout, the only requirement is new programming. Many other industries that depend on conveying have begun to adopt distributed systems because of the simplification, flexibility and superior uptime.

Airlines and airports should consider making the change to distributed IO architecture, focusing on TCO rather than the initial capital investment. Implementing it now puts you a good place to increase efficiency and reduce maintenance costs. This same argument was made after a careful analysis in a Control Design article, wherein the author urges readers to look at long-term numbers for using each system.

Partnering with Kasa Controls 

The team at Kasa Controls has the resources and expertise to take care of the electrical design. They also have experienced team members that can train electrical contractors on how to bid such projects. It’s a smart partnership that gives electrical contractors a true advantage. Contact them today to learn more about their distributed baggage handling solutions.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Professional AV starts with a company putting its integrators, design engineers, and product specialists on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

When a spec writer or facilities lead searches this category, your integrators are what they find instead of a competitor.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Professional AV, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Professional AV: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Professional AV buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Professional AV expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your integrators, design engineers, and product specialists into the articles, video, and social content Professional AV buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Professional AV Insights

Neat says Zoho Cliq joins Neat Open Apps on Neat devices

Neat says Zoho Cliq joins Neat Open Apps on Neat devices

Zoho Cliq has joined the Neat Open Apps ecosystem. According to Business Wire, the integration runs across Neat’s Generation 2 device portfolio and is centrally managed through Neat Pulse.

  • 01According to Business Wire, Zoho Cliq is joining the Neat Open Apps ecosystem, and Neat said it is the first hardware partner to support Zoho Cliq.

Sep 22, 2026

AV Access AnyCo V100 offers 100W charging, 1GbE and 4K@60 sharing over one USB-C

AV Access AnyCo V100 offers 100W charging, 1GbE and 4K@60 sharing over one USB-C

AV Access says the AnyCo V100 video bar is now available. The company says one USB-C cable connects a laptop to the camera, microphones and speaker, while also supporting screen sharing up to 4K@60Hz 4:4:4 on compatible USB-C hosts, 1Gbps wired networking and up to 100W charging.

  • 01According to AV Access’ Sept. 15 Business Wire release, one USB-C cable can connect a laptop to room AV, screen sharing, wired networking and laptop charging.
  • 02AV Access says the same USB-C cable supports screen sharing up to 4K@60Hz 4:4:4 on compatible USB-C hosts, provides 1Gbps wired network access and delivers up to 100W charging.
  • 03AV Access says 4K@60Hz 4:4:4 screen sharing is supported on compatible USB-C hosts, and that the same USB-C connection can deliver up to 100W charging.

Sep 22, 2026

End users made up 37% of InfoComm 2026's 28,132 attendees

End users made up 37% of InfoComm 2026's 28,132 attendees

AVIXA reports InfoComm 2026 drew 28,132 verified attendees from 94 countries to Las Vegas, with end users making up 37%. Microsoft and Cisco keynotes centered on AI agents for the meeting room. For enterprise workplace and IT teams, the June attendance mix and cross-platform AI pitches are timely as fall buying decisions approach.

  • 01A 37% end-user share at a pro AV trade show is a usable benchmark: more than one in three badges belonged to organizations that deploy the equipment, suggesting exhibitors may be demoing more directly to customers.
  • 02A sharper question to put to a collaboration vendor before the demo is which platform an AI meeting feature actually runs on. According to AVIXA, Cisco framed intelligent systems and open collaboration ecosystems as working across platforms including Microsoft Teams, Google Meet and Zoom, while Microsoft tied its voice agents to Teams Phone and Teams Rooms.
  • 03The 170-meter Cat5e reach BZBGEAR's Matt Richards cited to CE Pro for the XTREME-PRO, part of the XLink-ONE family that took Best of Show at InfoComm 2026 from AV Technology, is a manufacturer spec, not an independent test; for facilities with runs past 100 meters it is worth a bench check before fiber is designed out.

Sep 18, 2026

Explore More Professional AV Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Professional AV.

Browse Professional AV Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Professional AV and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512