Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

Morgan State won Maryland's first public AI degree in months by building it first

Morgan State University launched Maryland's first public AI bachelor's degree by converting an existing cloud computing program into a full AI curriculum, completing the regulatory approval in months rather than years. The program prioritizes foundational computer science alongside AI-specific coursework and hands-on reinforcement learning projects, positioning graduates to design and extend AI models rather than simply use them.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Promoted content from signals in higher ed on MarketScale.

By Darin Francis · Artificial IntelligenceHigher EducationDegree ProgramsCurriculum Design
Share

Key takeaways

01

Morgan State built 18 AI courses and embedded 8 completed projects into the curriculum before formally proposing the degree, enabling regulatory approval in days once evidence of the running program was presented.

02

Every student learns classical programming and data structures first, then progresses through problem-based courses scaled by difficulty level, culminating in a capstone with no lectures where the instructor acts as support.

03

The program emphasizes reasoning grounded in reinforcement learning and the Markov decision process rather than statistical analysis alone, preparing students to extend AI models and control technology instead of being directed by it.

Free workspace

Turn your Education Technology expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

New degree programs at public universities typically take a year or two to move from proposal to approval. Morgan State University's Bachelor of Science in Artificial Intelligence, the first at a public university in Maryland, took months. It moved that fast because the department had already built the program under a different name and was asking the state to recognize what was running.

Paul Wang, chair of computer science at Morgan State and technical director of the university's CEAMLS AI Center, traces the story back to a cloud computing program the department started in 2020. Within two or three years, he says, the case for a standalone cloud degree had weakened. Cloud infrastructure had become stable and ubiquitous, something he describes as a utility. Few students needed to learn how to build it, while nearly everything running on it, from robotics to model training, had become AI work. So the department began shifting the program's substance without waiting for a new label.

That shift was not incremental. The faculty developed 18 AI courses, far more than the roughly ten Wang says would normally constitute a major, and embedded eight completed AI projects into the curriculum. By the time the department proposed formally converting the degree, the cloud computing program was an AI program in everything but name.

Data, not a pitch, carried the approval

The proposal met objections inside the university, with colleagues questioning whether it could pass the Maryland Higher Education Commission. Wang says he treated the pushback as useful. Rather than argue the merits of a future plan, the department presented what already existed: the course list, the finished projects, and graduate outcomes, including students hired into AI model work at companies such as Microsoft, Google and Meta. "We are not a sounds good," Wang said. "We are more aligned with the program running now." Convincing MHEC, he says, took days once the evidence was on the table.

Wang is explicit that other institutions could take the same route, and he offered to share Morgan State's AI courses with any university or community college in Maryland or beyond that needs them. Building courses, he notes, takes money, expertise and time, and the department has already spent all three.

What the degree teaches, and what it refuses to skip

The fast approval does not mean a thin curriculum. Every student still learns programming and data structures the classical way before moving on. "Not, 'AI can do it for you. We don't learn.' No," Wang said. "You have to learn this structure, programming, all the classical parts, build a foundation, then you can do better." After that, most courses start from a problem rather than an assignment, with the same problem scaled from basic functions and libraries for lower-level students to open-ended critical thinking for advanced ones. Lectures dominate early. By the capstone, Wang says he gives none; he hands students a problem and acts as support.

Wang also draws a line between what he considers real AI and what much of the field practices. Most work, in his view, is statistical analysis: pulling data, running functions, producing a result. The program instead pushes students toward reasoning, grounded in reinforcement learning and the Markov decision process mathematics underneath it. That focus shows up in the department's two AI labs, where students work with humanoid robots and robotic dogs on reinforcement learning tasks, have built a CBT-based counseling model that students under stress can use, and train models to surface threats in cybersecurity data too voluminous for a human analyst to review efficiently.

The stakes for students, in Wang's telling, come down to position in the labor market. He acknowledges AI will hit entry-level programming jobs, and he does not soften it. His answer is that students must be more than users of tools like ChatGPT: they need to understand models well enough to extend them, and to control the technology rather than be directed by it. That mindset, and the willingness to convert an existing program rather than wait for a new one, is what Morgan State is betting will define the first graduates of Maryland's first public AI degree.

signals in higher ed

Part of this channel

signals in higher ed

Proven outcomes in higher education, from the people who achieved them.

Visit the channel

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

Darin Francis
Darin FrancisManaging Partner & CEO

With 20 years of experience at the intersection of higher education and edtech, Darin Francis brings a wealth of knowledge and a deep passion for driving meaningful change in the sector. Having led teams, crafted go-to-market (GTM) strategies, and worked closely with institutions, Darin is uniquely positioned to help edtech companies navigate the complexities of U.S. and Canadian higher education. Darin Francis, based in Detroit, MI, US, is currently a Managing Partner and CEO at Harbinger Lane Consulting.

B2B Weekly

The week in Education Technology, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Education Technology Insights

AI didn't break integrity, it exposed credentialism

AI didn't break integrity, it exposed credentialism

Phil Hill argues AI is exposing a preexisting higher-ed flaw: institutions built around credentials rather than demonstrated learning. In his view, better cheating detection won’t solve it; schools need clearer assessment of what students can actually do, drawing on competency-based education, authentic assessment, and frameworks like the University of Sydney’s two-stream model for AI-allowed and AI-excluded work.

  • 01Credentialism—treating the credential as the goal rather than evidence of learning—creates incentives for shortcuts that existed before AI; students pursue credentials as boxes to check rather than milestones in learning.
  • 02States like Michigan and Texas are redefining postsecondary credentials to include skill certificates alongside degrees, but broader definitions only matter if assessment measures actual learning, not just completion.
  • 03Hill’s three learning-centered models include competency-based education, authentic assessment, and the University of Sydney’s two-stream assessment framework.

Oct 6, 2026

Lewis University picks Ellucian Student to support its 2026–2029 strategic plan

Lewis University picks Ellucian Student to support its 2026–2029 strategic plan

Lewis University, which serves more than 7,000 students, will move to Ellucian Student, HCM and Finance. The rollout runs through Project Tailwind, a key part of the university's 2026–2029 Taking Flight strategic plan. The release lists support for a growing population of traditional, online, workforce and lifelong learners among the platform's goals.

  • 01Excelsior University deployed Scholarship Universe early while its Ellucian Student implementation is still ongoing.

Oct 2, 2026

CoSN tells school districts to plan for adoption before they buy new tech

CoSN tells school districts to plan for adoption before they buy new tech

CoSN's 2026 Blaschke Report and companion toolkit give K-12 districts a plan for technology change. Its main point is timing. Districts should define the problem, the success measure and staff workload before procurement, then run rollouts through change champions and a council that reviews significant technology changes.

  • 01CoSN’s toolkit pushes planning before procurement: define the problem, affected groups, timeline, and success measures, and account for competing initiatives and implementation fatigue.
  • 02The toolkit urges leaders to account for competing initiatives and implementation fatigue before procurement or a districtwide rollout.
  • 03After launch, districts should track adoption indicators, review feedback and help requests, keep refresher training going, and conduct a post-implementation review.

Oct 2, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

About the Expert

Darin Francis
Darin Francis

Managing Partner & CEO

With 20 years of experience at the intersection of higher education and edtech, Darin Francis brings a wealth of knowledge and a deep passion for driving meaningful change in the sector. Having led teams, crafted go-to-market (GTM) strategies, and worked closely with institutions, Darin is uniquely positioned to help edtech companies navigate the complexities of U.S. and Canadian higher education. Darin Francis, based in Detroit, MI, US, is currently a Managing Partner and CEO at Harbinger Lane Consulting.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512