Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesMarketing Tech

Google will stop counting display ad impressions that never render in February 2027

Google will count AdSense and Ad Manager display impressions only after an ad starts rendering, beginning February 17, 2027. Reported impressions are expected to fall. Slow ad loading will now cost publishers counted impressions, and they can measure the gap now with a side-by-side render-based metric in Google Ad Manager.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Marketing Tech teams put it to work with AI Writing.

By MarketScale Newsroom · GoogleGoogle Ad ManagerAdsenseBegin-to-render
Share
Listen to the audio brief

Key facts, context, and what it means.

AUDIO
0:00—
Google will stop counting display ad impressions that never render in February 2027

Key takeaways

01

Count-on-Download let latency hide inside healthy impression counts, and on February 17, 2027 that cover goes away.

02

The gap between standard impressions and Ad Manager's new BTR impressions metric is the baseline worth knowing before February: it shows how much inventory is counted today before it ever appears on screen.

03

The drop matters most for publishers whose revenue planning rests on raw impression totals, or whose pages carry heavy scripts, long bidder chains and extra wrappers.

Free workspace

Turn your Marketing Tech expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

On February 17, 2027, a display ad served through Google's AdSense or Ad Manager will only count as an impression once it has loaded and started rendering on screen. Today, the impression is recorded as soon as the creative begins downloading. Under the new rule, a slow-loading ad that has not rendered by the time the user navigates away will not be counted.

Eytan Sayag laid out the change in a MarTech360 guest column published September 28. He warned that reported impressions are likely to fall, and that sites not technically ready could see ad revenue drop with them. Google also expects reported display impressions to decline. That suggests revenue operations teams that forecast from impression volume could face a planning problem, even though the update looks like a small change to how impressions are counted.

Count-on-Download versus Begin-to-Render

For years Google has counted display ads using Count-on-Download, or COD. The impression is recorded when the creative begins downloading to the device, whether or not it ever appears. Under Begin-to-Render, or BTR, the ad has to finish loading and start drawing on screen first.

Sayag's example is a reader who taps the wrong link and hits back within two seconds. The page fired an ad request and the creative started downloading. Nobody saw anything, and COD logged an impression anyway. That is how download-based counting has hidden latency problems for years.

Publishers do not have to carry out any manual technical integration for the change itself. It covers display banner inventory on desktop web, mobile web and CTV.

What the February switch covers

2 platforms
AdSense and Ad Manager both move to render-based counting for display
3 environments
Desktop web, mobile web and CTV display banner inventory are included
2 formats
Display measurement moves closer to standards already used for video and native ads
0 integrations
No manual technical integration is needed for the change itself

MarTech360 (Eytan Sayag)

The seconds that go missing

Under BTR, impressions that never render will drop out of reports. The number that matters is how big that gap is on a given site, and what's causing it.

A page can post a healthy impression count while still losing inventory between request and render. He writes that latency can come from several places: heavy ad scripts, long chains of bidders, wrappers that aren't needed, and lazy loading that is badly configured. The basic complexity of the page adds to it as well. After February, each of these could cost counted impressions.

Reader behavior compounds it. A creative that takes several seconds to appear on a page people leave quickly won't earn what the same ad earns when it shows up while they're still reading.

Count-on-Download let latency hide inside healthy impression counts, and on February 17, 2027 that cover goes away.

Count-on-Download let latency hide inside healthy impression counts, and on February 17, 2027 that cover goes away.

There's a fair argument that the drop matters less than it looks. Sayag himself notes that an impression that downloaded but never rendered was always worth little to the buyer, so BTR mostly removes inventory advertisers weren't getting value from. The risk falls on publishers whose revenue planning leans on raw impression totals, and on sites where the gap turns out to be wide.

Comparison metrics in Ad Manager

Sayag's suggested first step is to compare standard impressions against the new ad server BTR impressions metric. The gap between the two shows how much inventory is currently being counted before it renders, which gives a baseline. He also recommends tracing the path from ad request to creative render and finding the unnecessary wrappers, heavy buyer scripts and bidder dependencies that slow it down.

Before February, pull standard impressions and BTR impressions for the same date range in Ad Manager. The difference between them is the number to shrink, and the figure finance should see before it becomes the official count.

A similar split between larger and smaller publishers could emerge this time. For publishers with ad tech staff, the BTR comparison could become the starting point for a latency audit. For leaner operations, running the comparison before February 17 could at least establish how large the gap is before the new count takes effect.

Featured companies

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Marketing Tech starts with a company putting its practitioners, product marketers, and RevOps leads on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Your buyers live in search and AI answers, so published expert content is the channel that compounds instead of expiring.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale NewsroomEditorial Team, MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

B2B Weekly

The week in Marketing Tech, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Marketing Tech: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Marketing Tech buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Marketing Tech expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your practitioners, product marketers, and RevOps leads into the articles, video, and social content Marketing Tech buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Marketing Tech Insights

Only 9% of bank and credit union marketing teams use AI agents that can act

Only 9% of bank and credit union marketing teams use AI agents that can act

A Cornerstone Advisors survey commissioned by Persado finds 63% of bank and credit union marketing teams use generative AI for content, while 9% use AI agents that can carry out an action. With compliance reviews taking four to six weeks at some institutions, the approval queue can still set the pace, and measuring speed-driven gains may be limited by weak marketing attribution.

  • 01At banks and credit unions where compliance review runs four to six weeks, generative AI speeds up the step before the bottleneck, and the approval queue still decides when a campaign goes live.
  • 02Leaders expect to hand agents real work within two years, yet agentic AI sits at just 5% on this year’s priority list, highlighting a gap between expectations and planning.
  • 03Faster work earns budget only when its results can be tracked. CU Today reports that none of the respondents said their institution could reliably attribute every one of the six outcome measures Cornerstone covered, among them account openings, funded accounts, balances and profitability.

Sep 29, 2026

Uniphore's new Marketing AI builds a small AI model for every customer

Uniphore's new Marketing AI builds a small AI model for every customer

Uniphore’s Marketing AI creates a per-customer “digital twin” using a small language model fine-tuned on that individual to predict behavior and simulate campaigns before budget moves. Uniphore says storing learning as compact model weights reduces token overhead versus repeatedly prompting a large model, helping costs at enterprise scale. The open-weight models can run in cloud, on premises, or hybrid, which can pull IT and security into the evaluation.

  • 01Uniphore says storing what each customer's model learns as compact weights, in open-weight models the enterprise owns, lets one model per customer run at a fraction of traditional LLM cost.
  • 02Uniphore says it compares actual results with simulation predictions at every campaign node, which suggests it could build an accuracy record over campaign cycles and gives pilots a concrete predicted-versus-actual gap to evaluate.
  • 03Because the models are open-weight and can run on premises, companies bound by HIPAA or data residency rules are the ones for whom deployment options may matter as much as prediction features.

Sep 28, 2026

Outreach earns Forrester's top score on 15 of 22 revenue platform criteria

Outreach earns Forrester's top score on 15 of 22 revenue platform criteria

Outreach received the highest possible score of 5 in 15 of 22 criteria in Forrester’s Q3 2026 Wave for B2B revenue orchestration platforms. Beyond the headline count, the 5s include areas such as administration and pricing flexibility and transparency, and the report outlines four agent-governance capabilities that can serve as a checklist: autonomy controls, monitoring, usage management, and outcome reporting.

  • 01For sales tech buyers, Forrester’s 5s in areas such as Administration and Configuration and Pricing Flexibility and Transparency add context beyond the headline count of 15 fives out of 22, alongside Forrester’s agent-governance checklist (autonomy controls, monitoring, usage management, outcome reporting).
  • 02Autonomy controls, monitoring, usage management and outcome reporting for agents in production make a usable requirements list for any team letting AI agents update CRM records.

Sep 28, 2026

Explore More Marketing Tech Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Marketing Tech.

Browse Marketing Tech Hub

About the Expert

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale Newsroom

Editorial Team

MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Marketing Tech and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512