Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Heterogeneous Computing and Solutions Provided by oneAPI 

Heterogenous computer systems – systems that contain different kinds of computational units (CPUs, GPUs, etc.) controlled by a general-purpose processor (GPP) and augmented by accelerators (XPUs) – are here to stay. However, the computational complexity inherent in these systems creates some unique challenges in the healthcare industry. In today’s “Health and Life Sciences at…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Promoted content from Intel on MarketScale.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

Heterogenous computer systems – systems that contain different kinds of computational units (CPUs, GPUs, etc.) controlled by a general-purpose processor (GPP) and augmented by accelerators (XPUs) – are here to stay. However, the computational complexity inherent in these systems creates some unique challenges in the healthcare industry. In today’s “Health and Life Sciences at the Edge” podcast, Intel’s Beenish Zia, Chief Architect for Medical Imaging in Intel’s Internet of Things Group, and Evgeny Drapkin, Chief Engineer for GE Healthcare Digital Platforms, talk with Tyler Kern about those challenges and solutions.

According to Drapkin, both the need for heterogeneous computing and the biggest challenges to its successful deployment can be illustrated by medical imaging. “In medical imaging, being able to deliver results from scans as quickly as possible is a necessity,” says Drapkin. “In many cases, like in stroke management, the speed of delivery can directly impact patient outcomes.” With the level of computational complexity growing every year, finding ways to increase image processing speeds is both imperative and challenging.

Enter heterogeneous computing using the Intel® oneAPI Toolkit. OneAPI is designed to meet the three biggest challenges developers and programmers face when creating heterogeneous systems:

  • Determining which hardware architecture to use
  • Selecting the proper software model
  • Porting legacy software in ways that take advantage of modern technologies

“OneAPI stands for One Application Programming Interface,” says Zia. “It simplifies software development and programming by providing a unified programming model. This model gives programmers the freedom to select the best hardware for their workloads, optimizes hardware performance, and removes hardware vendor lock-in.” Best of all, the same learning model applies to all industries and helps build community and industry collaboration.

Both Zia and Drapkin agree that heterogeneous computing is needed to identify and map algorithms to accelerator devices, then program those devices to deliver faster results. “Industries like medical imaging are driving the need for a common programming language that can transform how software coding is approached,” say Zia. “OneAPI provides a unified programming model that can be applied to all industries. Heterogeneous computing is inevitable. It’s up to us to optimize it.”

Connect with Beenish Zia and Evgeny Drapkin on LinkedIn.

More about how oneAPI could assist in heterogenous computing and rapid software deployment can be found at oneapi.io.

Subscribe to this channel on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Google Podcasts to hear more from the Intel Internet of Things Group.

Intel

Part of this channel

Intel

Silicon and AI platforms powering enterprise and edge compute.

Visit the channel

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Healthcare Insights

July partnerships show hospitals aligning without ownership change

July partnerships show hospitals aligning without ownership change

A July McDermott Will & Schulte analysis and four July partnership announcements tracked by Becker’s Hospital Review point to affiliation models that stop short of mergers. St. Christopher’s signed a nonbinding letter of intent with Nemours, Jefferson and Temple; Palomar UC San Diego Health began operating July 1 under a joint powers authority. Several announcements explicitly rule out ownership change, shifting the work to contracts covering governance and other terms.

  • 01In an alliance, the contract does the integrating that an org chart does in a merger: McDermott Will & Schulte says governance design, exclusivity, antitrust review, community commitments and exit rights all have to be settled before signing.
  • 02Purchasing is now explicitly on the table in at least one no-ownership deal, the St. Peter's Health and Billings Clinic-Logan Health talks in Montana, which means shared supply contracts can arrive without a change of control.

Sep 19, 2026

Eye telemedicine hits limits without home retinal imaging

Eye telemedicine hits limits without home retinal imaging

An Ophthalmology Times commentary by T.Y. Alvin Liu, Ferdinand Hui and Phillip Phan sorts eye patients into three telemedicine tiers by clinical need. Patients needing regular OCT scans benefit less unless a home device can send the image. Video tools already sit inside Epic and Cerner; the deciding purchase for retina clinics is the imaging device in the patient's living room.

  • 01The dividing line for eye telemedicine is imaging, not video: patients who need regular OCT scans benefit less from remote visits unless a device at home can send the scan, so a video license alone shifts few of those encounters.
  • 02The provider-side requirement, a HIPAA-compliant secured video platform, was already built into Epic and Cerner by 2020; the patient-side requirements (1.5 MB up and down bandwidth, a quiet private room, comfort with the technology) sit outside the health system's control and are the ones worth screening for at scheduling.
  • 03Self-administered home color fundus photography for tracking non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy was named as the nearer route into retina telemedicine; home OCT for wet AMD is the harder gate and the device to watch.

Sep 19, 2026

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Wolters Kluwer Health argues value-based care software is judged on whether customers hit incentive thresholds and avoid penalties. A Fierce Healthcare-reported survey it cites puts value-based care at a quarter or more of revenue for 30% of organizations. The analysis is a vendor publication that ends by pitching its own UpToDate Connect API.

  • 01The sharper question for any population health or care coordination platform is whether it changes what a clinician does at the moment of decision, or only reports afterward what happened. Wolters Kluwer's reading of the evidence is that many platforms still struggle with the first.
  • 02Vendors selling into value-based contracts now face a build-or-license decision on clinical content, because Wolters Kluwer names current, trusted content, consistent clinician adoption across sites, and a traceable link from guidance to quality metrics as the three hard problems.

Sep 18, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512