Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEngineering & Construction

Should You Outsource Finishing or Build an In-House System?

If you’re a decision maker working in equipment or parts manufacturing, you’ve probably debated whether it’s better to finish your parts in-house or outsource the work to a custom coater. This decision requires a bit of calculus, taking into consideration the costs, workflow, time and capabilities. Even if you’ve run the math countless times, you…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Engineering & Construction teams put it to work with Partner & Channel Enablement.

·
Share
Should You Outsource Finishing or Build an In-House System?

Free workspace

Turn your Engineering & Construction expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

If you’re a decision maker working in equipment or parts manufacturing, you’ve probably debated whether it’s better to finish your parts in-house or outsource the work to a custom coater. This decision requires a bit of calculus, taking into consideration the costs, workflow, time and capabilities. Even if you’ve run the math countless times, you still may be unsure whether you’re making the right play. To create more confidence in your decision, here are seven questions you can ask yourself when choosing between outsourcing or insourcing your finishing process.

  • If you’re currently outsourcing, what are your finishing costs? Hiring a custom coater to do the work makes sense if your costs are low, but if you’re spending more than $500,000 a year with custom coaters, maybe it’s time to consider investing in your own system to save money in the long run.
  • How much customization is required for your finishes? If your finishing needs aren’t super complex, consider doing it in-house. However, some finishes require very specific equipment that may be hard to come by, expensive or difficult to replicate easily. In that case, outsourcing the work is a good bet, unless you have no conveniently located providers of those types of finish.
  • Do you find yourself at the mercy of your custom coater’s schedule? Maintaining an efficient operation that stays on schedule is important for a smooth, revenue-generating business. But professional coaters tend to work by batching items based on similar characteristics, especially by color. This makes their operation more efficient and helps you keep your costs lower, but their timetable may not suit yours, causing delays that range from days to weeks. Moving the work in-house can help remedy this problem.
  • Do you crate and ship your items to a coater that they ship back? 
    The crating and shipping process on both ends can not only be time and labor intensive, but it also opens opportunities for damages to your finish coat, requiring rework or a price concession. Plus, damages or defects can tarnish your brand image. These problems are best avoided by establishing an internal finishing process with high quality standards.
  • How much are you spending on shipping costs alone to outsource your finishing?
    Shipping isn’t cheap, and if the costs run your operation more than $50,000 a year on top of your coating costs, again…consider building your own system. This extra savings will help the total ROI, allowing a faster recoup for your investment.
  • How often do you find yourself changing custom coaters?

Maybe you switched because you needed better quality. Maybe you switched again because the finishing and/or shipping costs kept rising and you needed a more budget-friendly price. And then you switched, yet again, because you needed a custom coater that had greater production capabilities, provided better service or offered faster delivery. If you switched coaters multiple times in the past few years and had to absorb costs that come with each change, you may be able to save yourself headaches and cash by bringing the job in-house.

  • Do you wish you had better control over the items you currently outsource for finishing?
    If you do decide to consider insourcing your finishing processes, consider if you need an especially flexible system that can handle a wide variety of parts. Historically, most automated finishing systems have not been very flexible, but new options exist to change that. With an IntelliFinishing System you can make sure work is done to your superior level of satisfaction, and even quickly adjust the process (or recipe) as needed to coat items to the highest quality possible.

IntelliFinishing is a complete finishing systems provider. Our systems use revolutionary modular conveyors and smart control technology that is second to none. Recently, Jorge Martinez, owner of JR Custom Fabrication, decided to switch from outsourcing to in-house finishing. After his first year of using his new IntelliFinishing System, he states,

“Over the last 25 to 30 years we’ve outsourced our powder coating. We were spending upwards of a million dollars a year in outside coatings, and we decided to bring it in-house, not only for more control of quality but also of scheduling. It’s been a wise choice. We were spending over $100,000 on transporting costs alone. That completely goes away. There have been savings in handling and damage as well. Now, as soon as parts come off the finishing line, we inspect them for quality. If there is a problem then we address it immediately. And having control over the whole system is probably the biggest plus.” – Jorge Martinez 

Finishing in-house made sense for JR Custom Fabrication and it could be the smart play for your business as well.

Of course, if you are a custom coater and interested in an automated system, you’ll obtain greater system flexibility and consequently a wider range of coating options with an IntelliFinishing System.

Read more at intellifinishing.com

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Engineering & Construction starts with a company putting its project engineers, superintendents, and estimators on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Owners shortlist firms they already trust, and your field leaders become the reason your name is on that list.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Engineering & Construction, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Engineering & Construction: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Engineering & Construction buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Engineering & Construction expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your project engineers, superintendents, and estimators into the articles, video, and social content Engineering & Construction buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Engineering & Construction Insights

Why Momentive says city data centers need sealant built for 1,000-foot towers

Why Momentive says city data centers need sealant built for 1,000-foot towers

Planners are pushing urban data centers toward glass facades. Bull argues high-load structural silicone glazing—like the 30 psi UltraGlaze SSG4600 used on Austin’s 1,025-foot Waterline tower—can help support heavier security glass and tighter enclosure performance in new multi-story builds.

  • 01When a city insists a data center look like an office building, the sealant holding the glass ends up doing work for the cooling plant.
  • 02Rifle-rated UL 752 Level 7 glazing runs about 15 pounds per square foot, so the security rating and the sealant's 30 psi design strength belong in the same specification review.
  • 03The supertall-sealant case applies mainly to new urban builds; most operating U.S. data centers can't shut down for facade replacement and harden their glass through retrofit shields instead.

Nov 13, 2026

IndexBox sees panelized buildings growing 5.3% a year if panel plants keep up

IndexBox sees panelized buildings growing 5.3% a year if panel plants keep up

IndexBox forecasts the global panelized buildings market to grow 5.3% a year from 2026 to 2035, with residential housing at about 45% of 2026 demand. Factory capacity is the catch. Limited mass timber and specialized steel framing capacity will hold growth back in some regions, and IndexBox expects investment in new plants and automation to ease those bottlenecks by the late 2020s.

  • 01Panels swap scarce framing crews for factory hours, and through the late 2020s the factory hours for mass timber and specialized steel framing are scarce too.
  • 02Housing is 45% of panelized demand, but commercial and institutional projects are expected to grow faster because owners are paying for schedule certainty; warehouse and campus owners are closest to that shift.
  • 03Mid-scale volumetric modular plants are estimated to need 60% to 70% utilization to break even; panel lines use different equipment, but the report argues the same fixed-cost logic can make order-book visibility important before adding shifts or lines.

Nov 11, 2026

Requests for Paebbl's carbon-storing cement substitute far outstrip what it can produce

Requests for Paebbl's carbon-storing cement substitute far outstrip what it can produce

Rebond 300 replaces up to 30% of cement in concrete with no equipment changes. In a Holcim and Goldbeck floor slab trial at C30/37, its workability, setting time and finishing matched the reference mix. Demand exceeds what Paebbl can produce, and closing that gap is now its main challenge.

  • 01After Rebond 300 runs through a standard ready-mix plant and hits C30/37 with no schedule change, buyers’ next questions shift to supply and allocation—how many tonnes Paebbl can ship—alongside price and how much of the mix to commit.
  • 02If Rebond 300 displaces up to 30% of cement yet can cut embodied carbon by up to 40%, the figures imply a negative footprint beyond simple substitution; Paebbl cites a verified -149 kg CO2e per tonne of product, with results depending on mix design.

Nov 11, 2026

Explore More Engineering & Construction Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Engineering & Construction.

Browse Engineering & Construction Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Engineering & Construction and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512