Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesSciences

Agilent's new 5987A GC/MS takes aim at costly sample reruns

Agilent’s 5987A GC/MSD adds vendor-claimed up to 25% faster scanning and a wider detector range alongside GC Assist diagnostics tracking 60-plus parameters. Its design focuses on taking injections out of workflows to limit reruns. With helium spot prices reportedly doubling after the March 2026 disruption, avoided reruns can save gas, but EPA criteria checks and ISO/IEC 17025 verification still come first.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Sciences teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By MarketScale Newsroom · Agilent Technologies5987a Gc/msdGc/msSingle Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry
Share
Agilent's new 5987A GC/MS takes aim at costly sample reruns

Key takeaways

01

Injection-cutting features can matter most: MassHunter’s simultaneous dSIM/Scan to combine SIM quantitation and library-searchable full scan in one run, and Agilent’s claim of an order-of-magnitude wider dynamic range that could reduce dilution reinjections if it holds up in routine use.

02

Onboard diagnostics pay back unevenly. Labs that find faults by failing QC batches stand to gain the most, while labs on comprehensive service contracts may mainly change which contract tier they buy.

03

The up-to-40% energy cut applies with the IDP-4 pump, so bid scoring should confirm the quoted configuration before crediting the savings.

Free workspace

Turn your Sciences expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

A failed quality control batch on a GC/MS system gets paid for twice. Sharon Dong of Lab Manager laid out the math in her Nov. 10 review of Agilent Technologies' new 5987A GC/MSD. The lab pays once for the rerun itself, then again for the carrier gas and instrument hours that rerun consumes. That second cost has climbed this year. The review's editor's note says helium spot prices doubled within weeks of the March 2026 supply disruption.

Agilent's new single quadrupole mass spectrometer is built around that problem. It pairs faster scanning and a wider detector range with GC Assist, a built-in diagnostics layer, plus acquisition software that folds separate runs into one. Lab Manager notes the launch comes as labs weigh replacement cycles against tighter capital budgets, which puts diagnostics and energy draw into the purchase math. A lab manager replacing an aging detector can buy another conventional single quad or pay for one that monitors itself. The deciding number sits in the lab's own logs: how many of last year's reruns would the new system have prevented?

Where the second injection comes from

Over-range samples are one source of extra injections. Lab Manager compared this with previous-generation practice, where an over-range sample on an older single quadrupole GC/MSD has to be diluted and reinjected. Agilent says the Extended Range detector on the 5987A widens dynamic range by an order of magnitude. If that claim holds up in daily work, one calibration can cover both trace-level and high-concentration analytes, and no dilution rerun is needed. Agilent also says the same detector triples electron multiplier lifespan.

The second is the split between quantitation and identification. Selected ion monitoring (SIM) watches only target ions. Labs that want low-level SIM numbers for target compounds plus a library-searchable full scan for unknowns have run separate injections or built segmented methods by hand. MassHunter 14's Simultaneous dSIM/Scan mode captures both in a single analysis. Two injections become one.

Two more software pieces go after analyst time. Dynamic SIM automates SIM time segments, maximizing dwell time for sensitivity and peak shape so no one has to build retention windows by hand. Optimizer creates, updates and maintains SIM methods as compound databases grow. It targets the manual review work that would otherwise expand with every analyte list a lab adds. According to Agilent, the 5987A scans up to 25 percent faster than the company's earlier GC/MSD systems. Faster scanning sharpens narrow peaks and supports cleaner spectral library matches.

The 5987A against Agilent's previous GC/MSD systems

Up to 25%
Faster scan rate, which helps resolve narrow peaks and supports cleaner library matches
1 order of magnitude
Wider dynamic range, letting trace and high-level analytes share one calibration
3x
Electron multiplier lifespan from the Extended Range detector, one less consumable to schedule
60+
System parameters GC Assist monitors before a fault fails a batch

Agilent Technologies, as reported by Lab Manager

These are vendor-reported figures, and Lab Manager's review is careful to say the dynamic range pays off only if the gains hold in routine use. The direction of the design is still plain. The 5987A's most consequential features are the ones that take injections out of a sample's path, because at the helium prices Lab Manager describes, every avoided rerun saves gas as well as analyst hours.

Which feature matters first depends on the sample mix. A lab whose samples swing widely in concentration would feel the dynamic range first; a lab that injects twice to get both target quantitation and unknown screening would feel the dSIM/Scan mode first. A lab running SIM-only methods on samples with narrow, stable concentrations gains less from either, and its case rests on diagnostics and running costs.

GC Assist and the batch that fails at 2 a.m.

The third source of reruns is the fault nobody saw coming. On a previous-generation system, the operator usually spots drift only after a quality control check fails. GC Assist watches more than 60 parameters across the GC/MS workflow and flags results that fall outside predefined QC limits. When maintenance is due, it guides staff using onboard videos and step-by-step procedures. The software also monitors power and gas consumption and looks for carrier gas leak indicators, with remote monitoring and troubleshooting running inside the lab's secure network.

Warren Potts, vice president and general manager of Agilent's Gas Phase Division, framed the launch around labs carrying growing workloads with limited resources. In his telling, the built-in intelligence exists to surface potential issues earlier, simplify routine maintenance and keep scientists on their analytical work.

Diagnostics don't pay back evenly, though. Labs that already buy comprehensive service coverage may find GC Assist mostly changes which contract tier makes sense, Lab Manager noted, while labs running reactive maintenance get the biggest gain: an earlier warning before a failed QC check stalls a batch. The review adds that remote troubleshooting trims response time further, an advantage that would count most in a lab with no service engineer on call. That suggests the lab's own failure history, more than any spec, is the best predictor of whether the diagnostics earn their price.

Before the vendor demo, a lab could review its own failed QC batches and note what caused each one. The share that GC Assist or the wider dynamic range would plausibly have caught is the rerun reduction worth writing into the business case.

Helium, hydrogen and the power bill

Agilent states that, paired with the IDP-4 pump, the 5987A uses up to 40 percent less energy than the company's earlier GC/MSD systems. Anyone scoring bids should note that condition. A quote built on a different pump configuration is not the quote the 40 percent figure describes.

The platform carries My Green Lab's ACT label, awarded after an independent environmental audit, and supports hydrogen carrier gas, which labs are evaluating as a helium alternative. Lab Manager reports both factors now appear in procurement scoring as well as sustainability reports. Its advice is to treat the vendor-reported 25 percent scan and 40 percent energy figures, along with hydrogen support, as total cost of ownership inputs rather than footnotes.

GC Assist's gas tracking belongs in the same ledger. Lab Manager says the leak-indicator monitoring carries real financial weight while labs are working through practical responses to the helium shortage. So the leak alerts could reasonably sit next to the energy figure in a running-cost estimate rather than in the service column.

Verification before the first reported result

None of this shortens onboarding. For regulated environmental work, the US Environmental Protection Agency sets acceptance criteria rather than mandating hardware. SW-846 Method 8270E for semivolatiles and Method 8260D for volatiles both run on single quadrupole GC/MS, so a lab bringing in a 5987A has to show the new system meets EPA performance criteria before it goes into service.

Accredited labs have a second step: method verification records under ISO/IEC 17025:2017 before they report results from the new platform. ISO's own description of the standard lists a reduced need for retesting among its benefits. That is the same outcome Agilent is selling, reached through documentation instead of hardware.

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 is the standard accreditation bodies use to assess testing and calibration labs for competence, impartiality and consistent operation. ISO confirmed it in its 2023 review, so the 2017 edition remains current; it replaced the now-withdrawn 2005 version and added updates on information technology and senior management responsibility.

The practical upshot is timing. EPA criteria checks and 17025 verification runs consume analyst hours and instrument time of their own. A lab weighing the 5987A against its next capital cycle would do well to count those hours in first-year cost before it counts any rerun savings.

Why the upgrade stays in the single quad tier

A 2021 study in Analytical Chemistry by researchers at Scripps Research and Leiden University Medical Center described single quadrupole instruments as generally inexpensive, easy to operate and technically less complex. Triple quadrupole systems running multiple reaction monitoring remain the gold standard for small-molecule quantitation, the authors wrote, but they are typically expensive. The team's single quad quantitation approach came in at roughly 30 percent of the cost of MRM, with dynamic range of up to five orders of magnitude, comparable to the triple quad.

The authors also explain where some of that gap comes from. In MRM, the first quadrupole isolates a precursor ion and a collision cell fragments it, and that collision chamber brings inherent sensitivity losses. A single quad has no collision cell, so it avoids those ion losses.

That work covered LC/MS with enhanced in-source fragmentation, a different technique from the 5987A's GC work, so its numbers don't transfer directly. Still, the authors call their method a variation on an approach long used for high-sensitivity small-molecule quantitation with gas chromatography MS, which is the 5987A's home turf. What the study shows is the cost gap that keeps single quads on the bench for targeted analysis. For labs whose methods, such as 8270E and 8260D, already run on single quad GC/MS, the purchase stays inside that tier, and the 5987A competes on what it does to rerun rates and running costs.

The number that would settle the case doesn't appear on any spec sheet: rerun rates at labs that have run the 5987A through a full budget cycle, measured against the instrument it replaced. Labs that start counting their reruns by cause now will have their own answer ready when the replacement request reaches the budget committee.

Featured companies

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Sciences starts with a company putting its lab directors, applications scientists, and field specialists on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Lab and research buyers verify before they trial, and your scientists give them something credible to verify against.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale NewsroomEditorial Team, MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

B2B Weekly

The week in Sciences, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Sciences: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Sciences buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Sciences expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your lab directors, applications scientists, and field specialists into the articles, video, and social content Sciences buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Sciences Insights

Adding Genmab's petosemtamab to Keytruda cut head and neck cancer death risk in half

Adding Genmab's petosemtamab to Keytruda cut head and neck cancer death risk in half

Genmab's petosemtamab, added to Merck's Keytruda, cut the risk of death by 50% in 699 first-line head and neck cancer patients. The trial held regardless of HPV status. Full data will be presented at an upcoming medical meeting.

  • 01In a cancer where median survival runs about 10 to 12 months, adding petosemtamab to Keytruda halved the risk of death at the first interim look.
  • 02The benefit held regardless of HPV status, supporting use in PD-L1-positive patients without separating by HPV status.
  • 03The figure to watch at the full-data presentation is median overall survival in each arm, because the topline release reports only the hazard ratio.

Nov 9, 2026

UCB commits to Veeva Vault CRM platform

UCB commits to Veeva Vault CRM platform

UCB has committed to Veeva Vault CRM, which Veeva’s release presents as an agentic CRM platform to drive unified engagement worldwide. UCB and Veeva executives describe it as a stable foundation for UCB’s commercial strategy, while the AI claims, including the Agentic Call Report, come from Veeva’s product description. No go-live date or financial terms were given.

  • 01The executive statements focus on Vault CRM as a foundation. The AI pitch, including the Agentic Call Report, comes from Veeva’s product description.
  • 02Veeva says the Agentic Call Report turns field call records into "Commercial Evidence" about treatment barriers that went unseen before. If it works as described, call reports gain value when analyzed at scale.
  • 03No go-live date or financial terms were disclosed. A go-live date or first-market rollout from UCB would show whether a worldwide migration is moving.

Nov 7, 2026

Why ISPE put peptide and oligo facility design in one guide

Why ISPE put peptide and oligo facility design in one guide

ISPE's new Baseline Guide covers oligonucleotide and peptide facility design in one document, says Jim Love of CRB. It pairs a GMP survey of existing plants with a sustainability outlook and a piping safety framework for scale-up, while FDA's oligonucleotide guidances under dockets opened in 2022 and 2024 remain the regulator's own reference.

  • 01Peptide plants inherited API chemistry thinking and oligo plants biotech thinking; ISPE’s guide puts both modalities in one facility document with both inheritances.
  • 02The guide has three parts: a GMP survey of existing oligo and peptide plants, a forecast of how sustainability and scale will change the processes, and a safety framework for connective piping and equipment.
  • 03FDA keeps its own oligonucleotide-specific guidances under dockets opened in 2022 and 2024, so the ISPE guide works as an industry consensus alongside regulation rather than in place of it.

Nov 5, 2026

Explore More Sciences Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Sciences.

Browse Sciences Hub

About the Expert

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale Newsroom

Editorial Team

MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Sciences and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512