Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Interchangeable biosimilars are getting approved faster, and Wezlana shows why

The FDA approved Wezlana (ustekinumab-auub) as a biosimilar to and interchangeable with Stelara for multiple inflammatory diseases, which means it may be substituted without consulting the prescriber, subject to state pharmacy laws. A Springer analysis reported 26 interchangeable biosimilars approved since 2020 and said average approval timelines decreased from 798 days for applications dated in 2020 to 364 days for applications dated in 2024. The operational pressure shifts to formulary, payer, and specialty pharmacy workflow design.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By MarketScale Newsroom · FdaBiosimilarsInterchangeable BiosimilarWezlana
Share
Learn this in 60 seconds

Key facts, context, and what it means, in one minute.

:60
0:001:00
Interchangeable biosimilars are getting approved faster, and Wezlana shows why

Key takeaways

01

Interchangeability is becoming the default ask, not an afterthought: Springer found 17 of 26 approvals pursued interchangeability concurrently, which changes how buyers should time contracting and conversions.

02

Springer reported average approval timelines decreased from 798 days for applications dated in 2020 to 364 days for applications dated in 2024, which can compress planning windows for monitoring and implementation.

03

A new interchangeable ustekinumab option means the hard work is no longer clinical, it is operational: NDC mapping, EMR preference lists, substitution rules by state, and patient communications decide whether savings show up.

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s decision to clear Amgen’s Wezlana (ustekinumab-auub) as both a biosimilar and an interchangeable option to Stelara (ustekinumab) may read like a clinical milestone, but for operators it becomes a workflow and contracting issue. Interchangeability means pharmacists can substitute at the pharmacy counter without first contacting the prescriber, depending on state law, as Healthcare Purchasing News reported from the FDA announcement.

The bigger takeaway is review timing. A brief report in Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, published by Springer, analyzed FDA data on interchangeable biosimilars and reported that average approval timelines decreased from 798 days for applications dated in 2020 to 364 days for applications dated in 2024. For health systems, PBMs, and specialty pharmacies, shorter timelines can reduce the time between a product appearing on a watch list and needing a conversion plan.

Wezlana’s label coverage turns interchangeability into a real conversion decision

Healthcare Purchasing News reported that the FDA approved Wezlana on Oct. 31, 2023, granting it interchangeability with Stelara across several high-volume inflammatory indications. For adults, the FDA-approved indications include moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in patients who qualify for phototherapy or systemic treatment, active psoriatic arthritis, Crohn’s disease that is moderately to severely active, and ulcerative colitis that is moderately to severely active. The same report said the approvals for pediatric patients ages 6 and older cover moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis.

For enterprise buyers, the operative word is “interchangeable,” not “biosimilar.” An interchangeable biosimilar is a biosimilar that may be substituted for the reference product without consulting the prescriber, subject to state pharmacy laws, according to Healthcare Purchasing News. Healthcare Purchasing News also reported FDA officials said biosimilars can increase access and that FDA approval standards mean patients and providers can expect the same safety and effectiveness from both a biosimilar and an interchangeable biosimilar as they would for the reference product.

When a biologic becomes interchangeable, the savings case lives or dies in the build: substitution rules, item masters, and order pathways.

The FDA’s interchangeable biosimilar pipeline has accelerated, and approvals are bunching

Springer’s analysis, based on the FDA Purple Book archive as of September 2025 and FDA approval letters, counted 26 FDA-approved interchangeable biosimilars since 2020. Springer reported that 19 were approved between January 2024 and September 2025.

The same paper identified two manufacturer strategies: pursuing interchangeability in a concurrent submission (17 cases) or seeking it later after an initial biosimilar approval (9 cases). For pharmacy and payer operations teams, that split shows up as unpredictability in “when” a biosimilar becomes eligible for pharmacy-level substitution. Concurrent submissions compress that uncertainty.

The approval-time data point is the one that should change internal timelines. Springer reported average approval timelines decreased from 798 days for applications dated in 2020 to 364 days for applications dated in 2024. That does not automatically translate to immediate uptake, but it can mean that organizations that review biosimilar readiness quarterly may find themselves making decisions after the market has already started moving.

Where the operational work shifts: formulary, IT build, and state-by-state substitution

Interchangeability is often described in regulatory terms, but the day-to-day burden lands across pharmacy operations, IT, and procurement. Healthcare Purchasing News’ description of pharmacy-level substitution “subject to state pharmacy laws” is the practical catch: multi-state health systems and national pharmacy organizations have to manage different substitution permissions and documentation requirements across their footprint.

In practice, Wezlana-like approvals force a chain of small, failure-prone tasks that decide whether savings show up. Drug file and item master maintenance, NDC mapping and crosswalks (particularly when both reference and biosimilar products remain active), prior authorization rule updates, claims edits, and EMR preference list changes all have to be aligned with formulary policy. None of those steps are optional when a product can be substituted at the pharmacy level.

Springer’s paper also described the FDA’s June 2024 draft guidance on interchangeability as relaxing approval criteria by focusing on analytic rather than clinical findings. The study also reported that all currently approved interchangeable biosimilars completed pre-approval switching studies. For operators, the implication is practical: development timelines and launch timing may keep tightening, increasing the value of standing conversion playbooks.

Where this lands in 2026 contracting and conversion planning

The immediate takeaway for procurement leaders is not that another ustekinumab product exists. It is that interchangeability is increasingly arriving as part of the first commercial posture, and approvals are coming faster, according to Springer’s dataset. That changes how teams should sequence contracts, operational readiness, and patient communication.

  • Build a standing “interchangeable launch” checklist that starts with state substitution requirements in the markets served and ends with EMR and pharmacy system preference changes, because Healthcare Purchasing News notes substitution is state-law dependent.
  • Ask manufacturers and wholesalers whether interchangeability is being pursued concurrently or later. Springer found concurrent submission for interchangeability in 17 cases and delayed pursuit in 9 cases, and that difference affects conversion timing and rebate guarantee language.
  • Tighten monitoring cadence for the Purple Book and FDA letters if the organization is still reviewing biologic class conversions once or twice a year. Springer reported average approval timelines decreased to 364 days for applications dated in 2024.
  • For ustekinumab specifically, validate which dispensing channels will drive substitution and align the PA and claims edits accordingly. Interchangeability can shift volume only if payer and pharmacy edits match formulary intent.

Featured companies

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale NewsroomEditorial Team, MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Healthcare Insights

AAO-HNSF hearing loss guideline moves audiograms and amplification into primary care

AAO-HNSF’s new age-related hearing loss guideline calls for screening adults starting at age 50 and escalating to otoscopy, audiogram, and appropriately fit amplification. It shifts hearing loss from “patient complaint” to a routine primary-care workflow. The pressure shows up in audiology capacity, referral design, and documentation standards.

  • 01Screening at age 50 becomes a repeatable workflow, so capacity planning shifts from episodic ENT referrals to steady primary-care volume, especially where annual wellness visits are a dominant access point.
  • 02The guideline’s escalation sequence, screen, otoscopy, audiogram, amplification, then cochlear implant candidacy evaluation, creates a measurable funnel that health systems can instrument in the EHR and manage like any other pathway.
  • 03Asymmetric loss remains a separate trigger for MRI in many settings, and 2026 pre-proof work using NHANES and SEER highlights why imaging criteria choices can swing scan volume, a budgeting and radiology access issue, not a clinical footnote.

Sep 7, 2026

ADHA shifts My Health Record to multi-supplier ops as Accenture signs new 3-year contract

ADHA shifts My Health Record to multi-supplier ops as Accenture signs new 3-year contract

Accenture will keep supporting Australia’s My Health Record under a new three-year contract. ADHA is moving the platform to a multi-supplier operating model. The shift raises questions about shared integration discipline, tooling, and accountability when changes hit production.

  • 01Multi-supplier delivery is spreading across national-scale health platforms, as ADHA's My Health Record shift shows, moving risk from vendor selection to integration, runbooks, and accountability.
  • 02GenAI model upgrades are arriving with healthcare-specific claims, but the procurement work moves to evidence, safety controls, and monitoring once models sit inside clinical workflows.
  • 03Embedded AI expands the cyber asset inventory problem: if teams cannot discover the AI components across endpoints and devices, they cannot reliably secure or audit them.

Sep 7, 2026

Hospitals need a shortlist as cardiology AI clearances hit 225

Hospitals need a shortlist as cardiology AI clearances hit 225

Cardiology now has 225 FDA-cleared AI algorithms when imaging is included. That volume is the problem. Health systems now need tighter governance, integration checks, and clinical workflow evidence to decide what ships.

  • 01The useful benchmark for governance committees is scale: FDA-cleared AI totals 1,524 overall, with radiology at 1,163 and cardiology at 225 when CV imaging is included, according to Cardiovascular Business.
  • 02Procurement risk is shifting from “is it cleared?” to “where does it run?” because new clearances span cath lab guidance, echo quantification, remote monitoring, and image assessment tools that touch different systems of record.
  • 03AliveCor shows the long game: Healio reported 510(k) clearance for an ECG AI suite in 2020, and Cardiovascular Business listed a new clearance in 2026, a reminder to vet update cadence and post-clearance support.

Sep 7, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

About the Expert

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale Newsroom

Editorial Team

MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512