Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Humana's $2.8B BlackRock deal lets it buy back CenterWell clinics starting in 2028

BlackRock's $2.8 billion buys majority ownership of a joint venture holding about 150 CenterWell clinics, replacing WCAS as Humana's outside investor. CenterWell keeps a minority stake and keeps running the clinics. The terms set a timeline: two years of expected growth spending, an option for Humana to buy clinics back from 2028, and a BlackRock right to start a sale of any clinics still in the venture at the end of 2033, with CenterWell getting the first offer. The deal is expected to close in the fourth quarter, subject to regulatory approvals.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By MarketScale Newsroom · HumanaBlackrockCenterwell Senior Primary CareHps Investment Partners
Share
Humana's $2.8B BlackRock deal lets it buy back CenterWell clinics starting in 2028

Key takeaways

01

BlackRock's $2.8 billion buys majority ownership of about 150 CenterWell clinics, while Humana keeps day-to-day management and an option to repurchase clinics starting in 2028.

02

The 2028 buyback and 2033 sale terms apply to the roughly 150 clinics in the new joint venture. CenterWell Senior Primary Care runs 250 clinics in total.

03

The deal’s lower-cost-of-capital claim will be tested after closing—first by how the venture deploys new capital over the next two years to support clinics, open locations and pursue acquisitions, and then by Humana’s 2028 decision on whether to start buying clinics back.

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

About 150 senior primary care clinics are getting a new majority owner.

BlackRock is investing through funds and accounts managed by HPS Investment Partners, which is part of BlackRock, and will hold the majority stake. CenterWell, Humana's healthcare services business, keeps a minority interest and goes on managing and operating the clinics. Humana says patient care won't change.

Swapping one investor for another would normally interest only the finance team. Health systems and independent practices that compete with CenterWell for patients should pay attention to the schedule written into the terms. It spells out when new money gets spent, when Humana can start taking clinics back and when BlackRock gets the right to sell.

The schedule built into the joint venture

Over the next two years, the partners plan to put capital into the venture to support existing clinics, open new ones and grow through acquisitions. From 2028, Humana can buy clinics out of the venture whenever it chooses. If CenterWell hasn't bought back all of them by the end of 2033, BlackRock can start a sale process for the rest, and CenterWell gets the right to make the first offer.

  1. Fourth quarter 2026: the transaction will close, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions, according to Healthcare Finance News
  2. Next two years: the venture expects to use additional capital to support existing operations, open clinics and pursue acquisitions
  3. 2028: Humana's option to repurchase clinics from the venture begins
  4. End of 2033: BlackRock may start a sale of any clinics still in the venture, with CenterWell holding the right of first offer

Put together, the terms describe a financing deal with a planned way back to ownership. BlackRock's $2.8 billion buys majority ownership of about 150 clinics; Humana keeps day-to-day management and a buyback window that opens in 2028.

How fast Humana moves is the open question. It could take clinics back gradually as its own finances allow, or leave them with BlackRock for longer if outside money stays cheaper than its own. The reporting doesn't say how repurchase prices will be set, so the cost of any 2028 buyback is still unknown.

Why the money costs less this time

Humana's case for switching partners comes down to price. The company said it expects "a significantly lower cost of capital under the new joint venture, reflecting the maturity of the business," and said the WCAS relationship had been critical to building CenterWell's scale. CenterWell president Dr. Sanjay Shetty thanked WCAS for its partnership. Healthcare Dive added that Humana expects the deal to reduce liabilities on its balance sheet and free up capital for CenterWell's growth.

The deal in four figures

~150
Clinics in the new BlackRock-majority joint venture
250
CenterWell Senior Primary Care clinics overall, in at least a dozen states

Healthcare Dive, Fierce Healthcare, Healthcare Finance News

Humana's own explanation suggests the clinics are moving into a second stage. WCAS's money helped build the network to its current size, and a business that size can now raise money on cheaper terms. The reasoning is plain: investors charge less to fund a clinic network with years of operating history than one still being built.

One provision cuts the other way. Citing Humana's SEC filing, Healthcare Finance News's Eve Bender reported that CenterWell may have to compensate BlackRock if the investment's returns fall below an agreed minimum. Humana still expects the liabilities tied to that provision to be significantly lower than under its previous arrangements.

The two features may well be linked. A partner whose downside is partly protected can reasonably accept a lower return, which would help explain the cheaper money, though the reporting doesn't spell that link out. Whether the trade costs Humana less overall depends on how the clinics perform.

The deal fits a broader push. Healthcare Dive notes Humana has been doubling down on primary care delivery to diversify its revenue, expanding CenterWell through a series of investments and acquisitions. This is also Humana's second deal with BlackRock this year: Fierce reported that the insurer is selling its stake in Gentiva to a group of investors that includes BlackRock.

Who notices the new money first

The clinics themselves may notice least. CenterWell keeps managing operations, Humana has said care quality won't slip, and the clinics have already spent seven years inside a joint venture with an outside investor. For a physician or practice manager at a CenterWell site, the name on the ownership papers changes while the people running the clinic stay the same. That limits the schedule-driven reading: inside the clinics, the 2028 and 2033 dates may make no visible difference at all.

The effects are more likely to show up around the network. The venture's plan for the next two years includes opening new locations and growing through acquisitions. For health systems and independent primary care groups serving older adults in CenterWell's markets, that could mean a better-funded competitor opening clinics nearby, or a buyout offer.

Not every CenterWell clinic is part of the deal. Healthcare Finance News puts CenterWell Senior Primary Care at 250 clinics in at least a dozen states. About 150 of them are in the venture, and the buyback and sale terms apply only to the venture's clinics.

Talking partnership or sale with CenterWell in your market? Ask whether the clinics involved sit inside the BlackRock-majority joint venture or elsewhere in CenterWell's network, because the 2028 buyback and 2033 sale terms only govern the first group.

Year-end close, then the 2028 decision

Nothing changes on paper until the deal closes. According to Healthcare Finance News, the transaction will close in the fourth quarter, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. After that, the test of Humana's cheaper-money claim comes in two stages.

In 2028, Humana decides whether to start buying clinics back or leave them with BlackRock. That choice will show which owner Humana thinks should hold a mature senior primary care clinic, and what it is willing to pay for one.

Featured companies

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale NewsroomEditorial Team, MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Healthcare AI should give doctors attention back, not shorter visits

Healthcare AI should give doctors attention back, not shorter visits

Healthcare organizations should deploy AI to give clinicians back attention and capacity for better decisions, not simply shorten visits. Landry argues AI should fit into existing workflows with insights appearing at the right time, and that organizations should set clear governance and automation boundaries before deployment and measure what changes for patients, clinicians and the organization.

  • 01AI success in healthcare should expand clinician capacity for thoughtful care, not optimize for visit speed; a three-minute appointment is not patient-centered innovation.
  • 02Design AI into workflows clinicians already use with insights appearing at the right moment, making adoption a workflow problem rather than a training problem.
  • 03Set automation boundaries before deploying AI, specifying what it may do alone, what it recommends for clinician decision-making, and what requires explicit human control and accountability.

Nov 11, 2026

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

U.S. health plan administrative costs rose 2.7% to about $69.2 billion in the first half of 2026, even as margins improved to 4.1%. Black Book Research's 2027 outlook says AI is starting to move payer sourcing in both directions. Demand for specialist vendors stays strong in some functions, while automation could make in-house or hybrid models viable in others. The report recommends comparing each major outsourced service with rival vendors and the best internal or hybrid option, and checking whether projected savings become actual cash.

  • 01Every major outsourced payer service should be benchmarked against a rival vendor and against the plan's best feasible internal or hybrid model, a three-way contest at each renewal.
  • 02Staffing reductions, payment recoveries, avoided vacancies and productivity improvements may not translate into recurring cash, so plans shouldn’t assume outsourcing savings can fund AI until the service, AI and funding cases are evaluated separately.
  • 03Provider data sits on both sides of the sourcing question: it is a top pain point and a specialist-demand area, yet also one of the functions where automation could make hybrid or in-house models viable.

Nov 11, 2026

Hugh Chatham surgical tech program draws 65 for 12 seats

Hugh Chatham surgical tech program draws 65 for 12 seats

Hugh Chatham Health and Alleghany Health marked one year with Advocate Health as a surgical technology program drew 65 applicants for 12 seats. An anniversary release lists $11.3 million in pay and rewards and a separate capital figure, and says nearly 1,000 patients were connected to specialty and higher-acuity services through Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist. Local training seats look like the next limit in Elkin.

  • 01In rural North Carolina, a new surgical technology program drew more than five applicants per seat, which points to training capacity, not interest, as the thing to expand.
  • 02Pay and rewards totaled $11.3 million in year one, versus a separate capital figure—about 58% as large, by MarketScale’s arithmetic.
  • 03Nearly 1,000 patients were connected to specialty and higher-acuity services versus just over 70 virtual consultations and encounters (about 14:1 by MarketScale’s arithmetic), with expanded virtual care planned for year two.

Nov 10, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

About the Expert

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale Newsroom

Editorial Team

MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512