Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

How Lived Experience Drives One's Clinical Practice Leadership - Patrick Makarewich, UTSouthwestern

Lived experiences significantly influence one's leadership approach in clinical practice. Patrick Makarewich of UTSouthwestern shares insights into how personal experiences shape decision-making and patient care methodologies. Emphasizing empathy and understanding, these experiences drive innovation and effectiveness in healthcare leadership.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Promoted content from I Don't Care on MarketScale.

By Kevin Stevenson ·
Share

Key takeaways

01

Personal experiences play a crucial role in shaping leadership styles and decision-making in clinical practice.

02

Empathy and understanding derived from lived experiences can drive innovation in healthcare leadership.

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Patrick Makarewich, clinical practice manager for ENT and head and neck surgery at UT Southwestern in Dallas, brings an unusual credential to his administrative role: he is a head and neck cancer survivor. Diagnosed in 2017 with an HPV-related head and neck cancer while he was leading the cancer center at JPS Health Network in Fort Worth, Makarewich found himself navigating the healthcare system from the patient side at the same time he was managing it from the inside. That intersection has shaped how he leads clinical teams, engages with patients on the floor, and thinks about the operational challenges facing practice administrators today.

What a cancer diagnosis teaches an administrator

Makarewich's symptoms were easy to dismiss at first. A swollen lymph node along the neck, a history of allergies, and life in North Texas, where seasonal irritants are a constant, made it simple to rationalize. But a second node near his collarbone changed the calculus. His primary care physician confirmed the concern immediately, and imaging led to a diagnosis of HPV-related head and neck cancer, a type that has grown increasingly prevalent among men in their forties and fifties, distinct from the historically older, smoking-related patient population.

He chose to receive his treatment at UT Southwestern's Moffitt Creek Cancer Center in Fort Worth rather than at JPS, a deliberate decision to separate his identity as a patient from his role as the facility's administrator. Seven weeks of weekly chemotherapy and 35 radiation therapy sessions followed. The experience was serious, at times physically grueling, and occasionally absurd. His colleagues at JPS noticed he looked pale as a ghost on chemotherapy days even as he insisted he felt fine. "They said you were one of our worst patients," he recalled with some amusement.

The clinical reality was harder. Radiation targeting the head and neck region progressively compromises a patient's ability to eat and swallow. Makarewich avoided a feeding tube by consuming five or six high-calorie supplements a day, but the threat was a constant motivator. Nine years later, he describes that period as a turning point: "I firmly believe God put you in certain positions in your life," he said, reflecting on having been diagnosed while running a comprehensive cancer program. "I don't know why I'm in this spot." The experience did not simply give him empathy in the abstract. It gave him a specific, practical lens for rounding on patients.

I think the great thing, or one of the positives of the experience, is carrying that realization with me so that when I round on people now in the clinic, I ask a lot of just introductory questions about our services, about scheduling. But now I can sense when there's maybe something more. — Patrick Makarewich, Clinical Practice Manager, UT Southwestern

Operational priorities: access, staffing, and generational leadership

Makarewich's undergraduate background in industrial and operations engineering, a discipline he describes as lean Six Sigma thinking before that framework became widely adopted in healthcare, informs how he approaches the day-to-day pressures of clinic management. He identifies access to care and workforce stability as the two most significant stressors facing practice administrators right now, regardless of specialty. In a high-acuity program like head and neck cancer surgery, scheduling delays carry clinical consequences that go beyond inconvenience. A single open position among five surgery schedulers means the team is operating at 80 percent capacity, and that gap has real effects on how quickly patients reach the operating room.

On workforce retention, Makarewich takes a direct view: recruiting never stops, even when no seats are open. "The most important recruiting we do is with the people that are here Monday through Friday," he said. That means one-on-ones focused on individual circumstances, schedule flexibility where operationally possible, and attention to the whole person, including employees managing young families, pursuing degrees, or caring for aging parents. He is also attentive to generational differences within his teams, noting that earlier-career staff today show a stronger preoccupation with workplace safety and security than he recalls from his own early years, a shift he attributes to the media environment they grew up in and the events they have witnessed.

AI adoption and the human element

UT Southwestern recently appointed a chief AI officer, a move Makarewich sees as consistent with the institution's broader identity as an innovation leader. At the clinic level, the most immediate application is in AI-assisted note-taking, helping providers document patient encounters more efficiently without sacrificing the accuracy the medical record requires. Makarewich is measured in his assessment of where things stand, drawing a parallel to early internet adoption: the technology will do things no one anticipates and fall short in areas where expectations run high. What he is confident about is that provider work-life balance, particularly the burden of chart closure and documentation, is a real and solvable problem, and AI offers a credible path toward easing it. The work of integrating it responsibly, he suggests, is exactly why a named human leader for AI strategy makes sense.

I Don't Care

Part of this channel

I Don't Care

Candid healthcare leadership conversations with Kevin Stevenson

Visit the channel

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

Kevin Stevenson
Kevin StevensonTop Hospital Administrator & Healthcare COO, I Don't Care

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Healthcare Insights

How Targeted Patient Education Improves Outcomes - Stephen Page, SmarterHealth.AI

How Targeted Patient Education Improves Outcomes - Stephen Page, SmarterHealth.AI

Targeted patient education powered by AI can reduce preventable readmissions and improve health equity, but healthcare organizations must prioritize clinical oversight, data security, and ethical governance when implementing these solutions.

  • 01Preventable readmissions occur when patients misunderstand medications, miss symptom recognition, or lack clarity on follow-up instructions, creating clinical, operational and financial burdens for healthcare systems
  • 02AI-delivered patient education must meet three criteria: solve a meaningful clinical or financial problem, integrate naturally into care workflows, and avoid adding burden to patients or clinicians
  • 03Healthcare leaders evaluating AI tools should prioritize solutions that improve patient understanding, support clinicians, reduce avoidable utilization, protect data security, and demonstrate measurable clinical or financial results

Aug 31, 2026

Cleveland Clinic's 900-person AI summit signals a new buying cycle for patient routing systems

Cleveland Clinic's 900-person AI summit signals a new buying cycle for patient routing systems

Cleveland Clinic hosted an AI Summit that drew more than 900 registrants, reflecting growing hospital interest in AI across clinical and operational areas. The system is also backing a $50 million Mandel Foundation-funded "Digital Front Door" initiative meant to route patients to the right care setting and ease emergency department congestion, a sign that AI procurement is moving from point tools toward access-and-flow systems.

  • 01Cleveland Clinic hosted a 900-person AI Summit signaling AI's integration into healthcare operations.
  • 02A $50 million Mandel Foundation donation backs a "Digital Front Door" initiative aimed at routing patients to the right care setting and reducing ED congestion.
  • 03The shift moves AI procurement upstream, into patient routing, staffing, and facility-flow decisions rather than just standalone tools.

Aug 31, 2026

Medicare sets $137.53 maximum add-on payment per eligible inpatient case for CT triage AI

Medicare sets $137.53 maximum add-on payment per eligible inpatient case for CT triage AI

Medicare has announced a maximum add-on payment of $137.53 per eligible inpatient case for the use of AI in CT triage, utilizing Aidoc’s CT Body triage technology. This move emphasizes the importance of workflow integration, governance, and coding in hospitals employing radiology AI. The new technology add-on payment (NTAP) signifies a clear investment in AI-driven healthcare solutions.

  • 01Medicare introduces a $137.53 per-case payment for AI in CT triage.
  • 02Hospitals must integrate AI with proper workflow, governance, and coding.
  • 03The NTAP reflects investment in radiology AI solutions.

Aug 30, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

About the Expert

Kevin Stevenson
Kevin Stevenson

Top Hospital Administrator & Healthcare COO

I Don't Care

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512