Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

How Insurance Providers Can Focus on Their Strengths to Keep a Competitive Edge

Idaho’s St. Luke Health System is preparing to launch its health insurance plans to employees, on the Idaho insurance exchange, and as an employer-sponsored group plan. Clearsurance.com’s health insurance expert, Melanie Musson, explains how traditional insurance providers can focus on their strengths to keep a competitive edge. According to the Idaho Statesman, St. Luke’s Health…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

Idaho’s St. Luke Health System is preparing to launch its health insurance plans to employees, on the Idaho insurance exchange, and as an employer-sponsored group plan. Clearsurance.com’s health insurance expert, Melanie Musson, explains how traditional insurance providers can focus on their strengths to keep a competitive edge.

According to the Idaho Statesman, St. Luke’s Health System, the largest in the state of Idaho, is entering the health insurance marketplace by offering its own plans.

According to IdahoNews, beginning on January 1, 2023, St. Lukes’s will provide their health insurance plans to employees, on the Idaho insurance exchange, and to large and small employers for their sponsored programs.

They’re even considering building Medicare Advantage plans for Idaho residents in the future.

Potential for Healthcare Monopolies

Fierce Healthcare explains that these hospital-sponsored insurance plans developed as a response to the Affordable Care Act and “value-based payments rather than the traditional fee-for-service model.”

Although health systems joining the insurance marketplace isn’t new, this recent development in Idaho has the public questioning their risks. As a result, health insurance providers must consider the impact of new sources of competition and watch for potential unethical practices that could create an unfair marketplace.

When the same company offers services and payments, problems can arise. The health system-sponsored health insurance plan will benefit when policyholders use their health care system. However, this potential benefit could result in policyholders being steered to system providers for treatments.

The hospital system could make it harder for other insurance companies’ policyholders to access services. While these actions may seem counterintuitive for growing a business, there are pros and cons to this model, and these situations could arise.

As a provider offering competitive policies, it’s essential to call out behavior that’s not in the policyholders’ best interests.

Strategies for Competing with Hospital Health Insurance

Traditional health insurance providers should focus their marketing on providing equal coverage for a large network.

In other words, they will provide coverage for specialists and healthcare providers in different hospital systems so policyholders can focus on seeing the best provider for their needs without worrying about the pressure to remain in one hospital system.

Another strategy is to build strong relationships with multiple hospital systems, including the one offering competing insurance plans. There’s no benefit to burning bridges. Instead, fostering solid relationships will improve communication with hospital billing and customer experience, which will help build a competitive edge.

Hospital system health insurance tends to earn similar profits as private insurers, so more hospitals will likely follow St. Luke’s lead and offer health insurance plans to employees, on the Healthcare Marketplace, and to employers with group plans.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Healthcare Insights

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are choosing alliances over mergers, per a July McDermott Will & Schulte analysis and four July deals tracked by Becker's Hospital Review. St. Christopher's, Nemours, Jefferson and Temple signed a nonbinding alliance letter; Palomar UC San Diego Health launched July 1. Ownership stays put; governance, purchasing and outpatient investment absorb the change.

  • 01In an alliance, the contract does the integrating that an org chart does in a merger: McDermott Will & Schulte says governance design, exclusivity, antitrust review, community commitments and exit rights all have to be settled before signing.
  • 02Purchasing is now explicitly on the table in at least one no-ownership deal, the St. Peter's Health and Billings Clinic-Logan Health talks in Montana, which means shared supply contracts can arrive without a change of control.

Sep 19, 2026

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

An Ophthalmology Times commentary by T.Y. Alvin Liu, Ferdinand Hui and Phillip Phan sorts eye patients into three telemedicine tiers by clinical need. Patients needing regular OCT scans benefit less unless a home device can send the image. Video tools already sit inside Epic and Cerner; the deciding purchase for retina clinics is the imaging device in the patient's living room.

  • 01The dividing line for eye telemedicine is imaging, not video: patients who need regular OCT scans benefit less from remote visits unless a device at home can send the scan, so a video license alone shifts few of those encounters.
  • 02The provider-side requirement, a HIPAA-compliant secured video platform, was already built into Epic and Cerner by 2020; the patient-side requirements (1.5 MB up and down bandwidth, a quiet private room, comfort with the technology) sit outside the health system's control and are the ones worth screening for at scheduling.
  • 03Self-administered home color fundus photography for tracking non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy was named as the nearer route into retina telemedicine; home OCT for wet AMD is the harder gate and the device to watch.

Sep 19, 2026

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Wolters Kluwer Health argues value-based care software is judged on whether customers hit incentive thresholds and avoid penalties. A Fierce Healthcare-reported survey it cites puts value-based care at a quarter or more of revenue for 30% of organizations. The analysis is a vendor publication that ends by pitching its own UpToDate Connect API.

  • 01The sharper question for any population health or care coordination platform is whether it changes what a clinician does at the moment of decision, or only reports afterward what happened. Wolters Kluwer's reading of the evidence is that many platforms still struggle with the first.
  • 02Vendors selling into value-based contracts now face a build-or-license decision on clinical content, because Wolters Kluwer names current, trusted content, consistent clinician adoption across sites, and a traceable link from guidance to quality metrics as the three hard problems.

Sep 18, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512