Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

"Biotech in the Balance" - Dr. Jeremy Levin, Chairperson of Ovid Therapeutics

Dr. Jeremy Levin, chairperson of Ovid Therapeutics, joins I Don't Care with Dr. Kevin Stevenson to discuss the industry's "covenant with the patient," the complexities of drug pricing and the role of PBMs, and whether America can maintain its biotech leadership as China prioritizes the field strategically.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Promoted content from I Don't Care on MarketScale.

By Kevin Stevenson · · Biotech LeadershipDrug PricingPatient TrustPharma Industry
Share

Key takeaways

01

Dr. Jeremy Levin is the Chair of Ovid Therapeutics.

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Few industries have changed—and saved—more lives than biotechnology and pharmaceuticals. Yet few industries face as much public distrust.

That contradiction is at the heart of this conversation with Dr. Jeremy Levin, chairperson of Ovid Therapeutics, on I Don't Care with Dr. Kevin Stevenson.

The covenant with the patient

Levin has spent his career at the highest levels of biotech and pharma, and he doesn't shy away from where the industry has gone wrong. His assessment is straightforward: somewhere along the way, the industry lost sight of what he calls its "covenant with the patient."

The conversation explores why drug pricing is far more complicated than the number patients see at the pharmacy counter, the role PBMs and other intermediaries play, and why rebuilding public trust must begin with transparency and putting patients back at the center.

America's biotech leadership at risk

Levin also addresses a much larger question: Is America at risk of losing its leadership in biotechnology? With China treating biotech as a strategic national priority, the stakes extend well beyond healthcare economics to American innovation, competitiveness and national security.

The question isn't whether extraordinary advances in gene therapy, cell therapy, AI and diseases like Alzheimer's are coming. It's whether they will happen here or abroad.

I Don't Care

Part of this channel

I Don't Care

Candid healthcare leadership conversations with Kevin Stevenson

Visit the channel

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

Kevin Stevenson
Kevin StevensonTop Hospital Administrator & Healthcare COO, I Don't Care
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

AI cuts cardiologists' echocardiogram review time by 46%

AI cuts cardiologists' echocardiogram review time by 46%

Late-breaking research presented November 9 at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2026 reported that AI-drafted preliminary echocardiogram reports were comparable to human drafts. Cardiologists averaged 4.6 minutes finalizing AI drafts versus 8.5 minutes without AI. The findings are a non-peer-reviewed abstract.

  • 01Cardiologists averaged 4.6 minutes finalizing AI-drafted echo reports versus 8.5 minutes without AI, about 46% less time.
  • 02Cardiologists made substantial changes to 50.6% of AI drafts and 49.7% of human drafts.
  • 03The research used 1,200 echocardiograms from 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California medical centers.

Nov 9, 2026

After Chicago: Did AI at AHA 2026 Pass Its Own Test?

After Chicago: Did AI at AHA 2026 Pass Its Own Test?

At AHA Scientific Sessions 2026 in Chicago, AI ECHO INSIGHT, WATCH-LV, PARAMOUNT and PROVAR+ showed gains in workflow efficiency, screening and treatment decisions, but none established a reduction in hard clinical events. The takeaway: the next test is proving these tools improve outcomes, especially in high-need populations, by connecting to established care.

  • 01AI ECHO INSIGHT cut echo reads 8.5 to 4.6 minutes, and PARAMOUNT changed treatment decisions, but no AI late-breaker showed fewer hard events.
  • 02ZEUS and Lp(a)HORIZON lowered their target biomarkers without reducing major cardiovascular events, a caution against treating algorithmic accuracy alone as proof of patient benefit.
  • 03Low-technology, team-based interventions such as CATCH in Colombia and Jamaica lowered blood pressure, showing the care systems AI tools must connect to.

Nov 9, 2026

Hospitals can meet antibiotic stewardship rules without a full-time ID hire

Hospitals can meet antibiotic stewardship rules without a full-time ID hire

Access TeleCare pharmacist Ashley Selby describes a telehealth antimicrobial stewardship model sized to each hospital's gaps. Joint Commission Standard MM.09.01.01 and 42 CFR 482.42 require a qualified physician and/or pharmacist leader, not a full-time hire, and a 14-study meta-analysis found telehealth stewardship cut antibiotic days of therapy without changing mortality.

  • 01Joint Commission Standard MM.09.01.01, in force since January 2023, requires a physician and/or pharmacist qualified in infectious diseases or stewardship to lead the program, and its committee note allows remote participation.
  • 02The Board of Pharmacy Specialties counts more than 2,380 BCIDP pharmacists nationally, while many small hospitals still assign stewardship to pharmacists without ID training.
  • 03A 14-study meta-analysis found telehealth stewardship raised guideline adherence and cut antibiotic days of therapy, but did not significantly change mortality.

Nov 9, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

About the Experts

Kevin Stevenson
Kevin Stevenson

Top Hospital Administrator & Healthcare COO

I Don't Care

DJ
Dr. Jeremy Levin

Chair

Ovid Therapeutics

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512