Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesFood & Beverage

Food manufacturers are upgrading existing plants instead of building new ones

Food manufacturers are spending 2026 capital on upgrades inside existing plants, with equipment orders outpacing new construction. PMMI puts US food machinery at $5.1 billion for 2025, rising to $7.1 billion by 2031. Manufacturers are preparing for FSMA 204 in 2028.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Food & Beverage teams put it to work with Customer Stories & Case Studies.

By MarketScale Newsroom · Food ManufacturingFood EngineeringPmmiFpsa
Share
Listen to the audio brief

Key facts, context, and what it means.

AUDIO
0:00—
Food manufacturers are upgrading existing plants instead of building new ones

Key takeaways

01

Manufacturers are preparing for FSMA 204 in 2028, and that is shaping equipment and line-upgrade decisions.

02

New lines win approval before new plants because their return is easier to prove, especially when automation and hygienic design cut cost of goods and shorten sanitation.

03

Food and beverage manufacturing is projected to add jobs through 2034, suggesting automation is aimed at getting more output from a workforce that is still growing and hard to staff.

Free workspace

Turn your Food & Beverage expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Food Engineering's State of Food Manufacturing in 2026 cites the 2026 Processing State of the Industry Report, which PMMI and the Food Production Solutions Association (FPSA) produced together as a joint research project. According to that report, orders for new equipment are running ahead of construction of new facilities.

Put simply, this year's big capital projects are happening inside walls that already exist. For the plant engineering lead or VP of operations holding the capex list, that means the new line has to fit around a running operation and a crew that's already stretched. It also has to be ready for rules that take effect before the equipment is anywhere near paid off.

Machinery spending outruns construction

PMMI's 2026 Packaging State of the Industry Report gives a sense of the money involved. It valued the US packaging machinery market at $11.7 billion in 2025, with food machinery at $5.1 billion, or roughly 44%. PMMI projects food machinery shipments will reach $7.1 billion by 2031.

Where packaging and processing equipment money goes

$11.7 billion
US packaging machinery market in 2025, the total pool food competes in
$5.1 billion
Food machinery's share in 2025, roughly 44% of the market
$7.1 billion
Projected food machinery shipments by 2031
72% to 95%
Expected rise in robotics adoption among surveyed packaging and processing manufacturers by 2031

PMMI, as reported by Food Engineering

The joint processing report from PMMI and FPSA ties hesitation over new plants to economic uncertainty and an aversion to risk. It also cites borrowing conditions that are unfavorable and a shortage of the skilled labor that new plants would need.

Food Engineering describes the wider backdrop as tightening regulations, rising costs and deepening concerns about labor availability, all pushing manufacturers to run as efficiently and safely as possible. The magazine's own verdict on that goal: often easier said than done. Each of those pressures lands harder on a greenfield project, which has to finance a building and staff it from scratch, than on a line dropped into a plant that already has a crew.

FPSA President and CEO Chris Lyons told Food Engineering the pattern points to near-term caution, with tariffs, inflation and skills shortages all weighing on decisions. He expects spending to stay on brownfield upgrades, line expansions and targeted modernization for now. He also expects construction to catch up eventually. So the preference for retrofits looks like a phase of the cycle. Nobody in the report is declaring the end of new plant construction.

Why a new line wins approval first

David Pelyhes, a business partner at JPG Resources, offered Food Engineering a simple reason capacity expansion gets through finance more easily: it's easier to show a quick return, especially on automation and safety upgrades. In his view, a new line is a chance to build in the line integration and automation that would cut cost of goods sold but can't be retrofitted onto the old line.

The same logic applies to cleaning. Pelyhes said manufacturers can design out the hygienic design problems of the existing line, and that shorter sanitation can show up in cost of goods. Sanitation hours are hours the line isn't making product. That turns hygienic design into a cost argument as well as a safety one, and cost arguments are the ones that get capex approved.

Food safety is getting more weight in those decisions too. As major food safety incidents keep surfacing, Food Engineering reports, sanitation, hygienic design and traceability are now at the front of conversations about equipment purchasing and plant and process design. Nolan Lewin, executive director of Rutgers University's Food Innovation Center, said the companies he works with treat food safety as a higher priority than they used to. "Companies are stressing food safety, and they're trying to make strides," he said.

Before signing off on a line upgrade, ask the equipment supplier which lot, batch and production records the new line captures automatically, and which will still rely on manual entry when FSMA 204 work begins in earnest ahead of 2028.

Earnings and shelf prices put payback first

The earnings of some of the largest processors give that quick-return test real context. Food Processing's 51st annual Top 100 list, which ranks companies by 2025 or most recent fiscal-year sales of goods processed in US and Canadian plants, shows Kraft Heinz, General Mills and Conagra Brands each moving from net income in the prior year to a net loss. J.M. Smucker posted losses in both years. Hershey's net income fell by more than half, and Mondelez's by nearly half.

The pressure isn't universal. PepsiCo, Tyson Foods, JBS USA and Nestle still hold the top four spots by US and Canadian sales, and net income rose at Coca-Cola, Keurig Dr Pepper and JBS USA. Still, at companies whose earnings look like the first group's, a project that proves a quick return would likely be easier to defend than a multi-year greenfield bet.

Pricing offers little extra cushion. USDA's Economic Research Service, whose September 2026 Food Price Outlook incorporates August consumer and producer price data, shows grocery prices rising more slowly than prices across the economy.

Grocery prices trail overall inflation

3.4%
All-items CPI, August 2026 vs. August 2025
2.7%
CPI for all food, August 2026 vs. August 2025
2.2%
Food-at-home CPI, August 2026 vs. August 2025
2.4%
ERS forecast for food-at-home price growth in 2026 (interval 1.8% to 3.0%)

USDA Economic Research Service, Food Price Outlook, September 2026

Grocery prices are a consumer-side measure, but an index running more than a point below overall inflation suggests manufacturers have limited room to recover rising costs at the shelf. That's the condition in which a COGS reduction, whether from automation or shorter sanitation, becomes the most persuasive line in a capex request.

The view past this year is looser still. ERS forecasts food-at-home prices rising 1.8% in 2027, with an interval from -5.0% to 9.2%. Its forecasts come from statistical models fitted to recent trends, so that width is a fair signal of how little a multi-year payback model should lean on a price assumption.

More robots in plants that are still hiring

BLS projected in a July 1 Economics Daily release that, over the 2024 to 2034 decade, food and beverage manufacturing will add more jobs than any other manufacturing industry. The sector employed roughly 1.7 million people in 2014. By 2024 that number had reached about 2.1 million, and BLS expects it to top 2.2 million in 2034. In 2024 the sector already accounted for 16% of all US manufacturing workers, the largest share among the 20 manufacturing industries.

The longer series shows how recent that run is. Employment hovered between about 1.62 million and 1.66 million from 2004 through 2013, bottoming at 1,617,500 in 2010, then climbed in most years after, apart from a dip to 1,878,800 in 2020 from 1,919,400 in 2019. The sector added roughly 419,000 jobs from 2014 to 2024, reaching 2,100,600. The 2034 projection of 2,230,900 implies about 130,000 more.

So the workforce keeps growing, but at roughly a third of the previous decade's pace. If demand for output grows faster than that, more of the gap could fall to equipment rather than headcount.

Taken together, the two forecasts suggest food manufacturers are buying automation to get more out of a workforce that is still growing and still hard to staff.

Projected employment change by food and beverage subsector, 2024–34
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections · © MarketScaleDownload chart

Across the 10 industries BLS tracks within food and beverage manufacturing, the growth is uneven. Beverage manufacturing leads with a projected 37,800 new jobs, and animal slaughtering and processing follows at 35,400. The middle of the pack includes bakeries and tortilla manufacturing (18,800), other food manufacturing (21,900) and dairy (10,800). Three segments stay roughly flat: fruit and vegetable preserving and specialty food (-1,200), seafood (-800) and grain and oilseed milling (+300).

For operators in beverage and protein, competition for line workers could be sharpest, and that's where the business case for labor-saving equipment would likely be strongest. In the flat subsectors, automation probably has to justify itself on throughput, consistency or sanitation time, since headcount pressure is weaker. Bakery and dairy plants, in the middle of the table, may need to make both arguments at once.

One limit on the BLS figures: the agency projects only the 2034 endpoint and doesn't publish estimates for 2025 through 2033. So the projection says where employment ends up, but not how tight hiring will be in any given year of a five-year capex plan.

When construction catches up

The thing to watch is the gap between equipment orders and new construction in next year's PMMI and FPSA processing report. If construction starts closing that gap, as Lyons expects, greenfield projects will compete again for the same engineering teams and equipment slots. If the gap holds, that suggests investment will keep going into existing plants as manufacturers prepare for FSMA 204 requirements in 2028.

Featured companies

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Food & Beverage starts with a company putting its plant managers, quality leads, and R&D teams on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Processors and grocery buyers vet suppliers hard, and your operations people are the ones who can satisfy them.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale NewsroomEditorial Team, MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

B2B Weekly

The week in Food & Beverage, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Food & Beverage: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Food & Beverage buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Food & Beverage expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your plant managers, quality leads, and R&D teams into the articles, video, and social content Food & Beverage buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Food & Beverage Insights

Why Texas keeps calling a klobasnek a kolache

Why Texas keeps calling a klobasnek a kolache

Middleby's Innovation Kitchen chef builds a sausage-and-cheese klobasnek and a fruit-filled kolache from one brioche-style dough, proofing both for thirty minutes and sending the klobasniky into a Blodgett XR8, to show the two are different pastries. Texas Monthly dates the klobasnek to 1953 in West and the blurring to Kolache Factory's 1982 Houston launch, and bakers in Austin and Utah say customers rarely ask for the right word.

  • 01One slightly sweet brioche-style dough makes both pastries: wrapped around sausage and cheese it is a klobasnek, pressed into a well and filled with jam or ricotta it is a kolache.
  • 02The klobasnek is a Texas invention, dated by Texas Monthly to 1953 at a bakery in West, and the naming blur began when Kolache Factory sold both under one word in Houston from 1982.
  • 03Most shops will keep the sign as is: an Austin shop owner told Texas Monthly one customer in ten thousand insists on the distinction, and a Utah bakery wrote in September 2026 that it knowingly sells klobasniky as kolaches.

Oct 16, 2026

Tailored Bottling's Dearborn plant is built for 750 million cans and bottles a year

Tailored Bottling's Dearborn plant is built for 750 million cans and bottles a year

Tailored Bottling Solutions' Dearborn, Michigan plant is designed for about 750 million beverage units a year but is still ramping up. Only 18 people work there today. Staffing up to three shifts, roughly 45 to 50 workers, sets how quickly beverage brands can use that capacity.

  • 01Dearborn's 750 million-unit design runs on 18 workers today. Three full shifts need about 45 to 50, so headcount is the best public read on when full output arrives.
  • 02The Dearborn plant’s equipment is built for up to 750 million units a year, depending on the ramp.
  • 03TBS says its Miami site, TBS South, is fully operational and has completed large-scale runs and signed multi-year production agreements.

Oct 8, 2026

Thank-yous at the drive-thru window drop 23.9 points when AI takes the order

Thank-yous at the drive-thru window drop 23.9 points when AI takes the order

Voice AI completed the full order or engagement 40% of the time, up from 20%. But when AI handled the order, window staff said thank you 23.9 points less often. Accuracy and satisfaction rose even as ease of use worsened.

  • 01AI handled the full order or engagement in 40% of the voice AI encounters shoppers tallied, up from 20%. Yet when AI handled the order, instances of window workers saying thank you dropped 23.9 percentage points.
  • 02AI-only greetings fell to 50% of encounters from 70%, while full AI completion rose to 40% from 20%. In AI-built restaurants where AI took 81% of orders end to end, satisfaction reached 92.6%.
  • 03Weak greetings predate AI: 27.9% of counter guests at ten major chains weren't greeted, suggesting the drive-thru gap is an existing habit AI makes easier to see.

Oct 8, 2026

Explore More Food & Beverage Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Food & Beverage.

Browse Food & Beverage Hub

About the Expert

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale Newsroom

Editorial Team

MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Food & Beverage and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512