Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEngineering & Construction

How to Create Modularity in Data Centers

Edge Data Centers and Modularity: What Does It Really Mean? Modularity in data center construction has been around for over a decade. It began by taking the simple concept of standard, shipping container configurations and converting them into modular data centers but has since evolved into fully designed and prefabricated data center modules. For the…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Engineering & Construction teams put it to work with Partner & Channel Enablement.

Share
How to Create Modularity in Data Centers

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Engineering & Construction?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Engineering & Construction coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

Edge Data Centers and Modularity: What Does It Really Mean?

Modularity in data center construction has been around for over a decade. It began by taking the simple concept of standard, shipping container configurations and converting them into modular data centers but has since evolved into fully designed and prefabricated data center modules.

For the most part, these modules still match shipping container form factors, but they now exhibit designs much better suited for IT implementations with improvements in cost and performance.

The benefits of going modular have made it an intriguing option for many new construction projects – but there are many considerations you’ll need to keep in mind to make any modular project a success.

The Two Central Categories of Modularity in Data Centers

With the emergence of edge computing and increasing demand for IT support and applications closer to the end user, modular design can help organizations save on both implementation time and costs without sacrificing key functionality, scalability or performance.

The challenge, then, is that the term “modularity,” just like the terms “cloud” or even “edge,” can be interpreted in many different ways based on the particular discussion or project at hand.

Let’s try to clear up some of that murkiness. To begin, we’ll better define modularity by splitting it into two main buckets – modular components that are utilized for a traditional data center configuration and fully complete modular IT solutions.

Modular components can literally be any type of data center component that can be placed on a skid or platform, assembled in a factory environment, then shipped to the site for final integration.

This can include chiller systems, power distribution and UPS systems, air handlers, and even modular or segmented data halls (white space) that are shipped onsite. The primary objective of any of these solutions is to improve efficiencies and save on site construction time.

On the other end of the spectrum is what is defined as the prefabricated or modular IT data center. This type of data center is comprised of three primary elements – cooling, power distribution and the IT enclosure.

These systems can be part of an IT solution provided by and IT OEM, can be solution-based and tailored to a specific application and use case, or can be agnostic to the IT application or environment. The challenge is how these elements are designed, sized and configured for your organization’s unique IT application and load.

What to Consider when Choosing a Modular IT Data Center

There is a growing demand for complete IT modular solutions in multiple markets for edge or other specific application deployments. With that growth comes multiple vendors that offer full, end-to-end IT modularization. How these vendors approach modularity is a critical element to understand, as modular solutions do operate differently than more traditional data center implementations.

As an example, modular data centers have a much more tightly coupled power and cooling relationship with the IT than is found in a traditional raised floor data center environment. For cooling, this means that the reaction time is quite a bit different when the IT power load cycles up or down or if the cooling fails.

A good illustration of this is a typical conference room that we will assume holds about 12 people. Further assume that there are seven people in the room one day in July, and the air conditioner stops working. Given the size of the room and the fact that it was sized for more people than are present, you may not even notice the AC is out for quite a while or until air in the room starts to get stuffy.

This is comparable to loosing a CRAC or CRAH unit in a traditional data center where, due to capacity sizing, typical rack IT load, etc., you can potentially lose a cooling unit that may not affect the IT for quite some time, if at all.

Now, assume you are in a car, still in July, with a friend. The AC in the car goes out. You would probably notice it almost immediately, and it would get very uncomfortable very quickly.

This is analogous to how modular closely coupled cooling works. The reaction time if the IT load changes dramatically or you have a cooling failure is much more pronounced and immediate, so you must take that into account in your capacity planning.

Notice we have not mentioned failover, redundancy, N+1, tier levels, etc., which, for any data center, would be part of the planning process. Yes, these elements still matter, but they are considered a bit differently given how failover and redundancy function in a modular application.

For modular IT deployments, TAS recommends that you consider the following elements as part of your planning:

1. Understanding your application and the actual application dynamics. What are you supporting from an IT perspective, how does the application function, and what are the IT load characteristics or power operating ranges you expect to see?

2. How much IT and IT infrastructure do you need to support the application and the use case? How much IT and how many IT racks are you going to deploy to support the application requirements, and what is the kW/rack load dynamics?

3. What other factors affect your IT application or sizing requirements?

From the above information, you can start to size and optimize your modular solution to your actual application and IT operating environment. This will allow you to better optimize IT infrastructure elements, module costs and final operating costs.

This approach also allows you to optimize for your actual application using the three elements of modularity we discussed earlier – power, cooling and the IT enclosure matching each to your specific application and operating requirements.

Working Alongside TAS to Find Your Ideal Solution

With those two central categories of modular data centers in mind, you can better approach your own project and find the right solution for your needs. You’ll need to consider available site construction time, overall timeline, costs and more, but you’ll be more informed to think about these factors in a meaningful way.

Here are a few other key considerations you’ll need to keep in mind:

– Do you have a very specific location in mind? Traditional, stick-built data centers require more rigidity in their placement, while modular solutions can essentially be built anywhere.

– What amount of scalability do you need? Modular construction often offers more ability to expand the data center in the future than traditional construction.

– What about powering the data center, itself? Smaller footprints are typical with modular solutions, which can mean savings on power and cooling costs.

Choosing to partner with an experienced industry leader like TAS can also help ensure you choose the right modular data center solution for you.

TAS leverages a proven and robust supply chain and expert teams, working alongside you to complete the optimal project for you. To learn more, contact TAS today.

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @MarketScale

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Engineering & Construction starts with a company putting its project engineers, superintendents, and estimators on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Owners shortlist firms they already trust, and your field leaders become the reason your name is on that list.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Engineering & Construction Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Engineering & Construction: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Engineering & Construction buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Engineering & Construction expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your project engineers, superintendents, and estimators into the articles, video, and social content Engineering & Construction buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Engineering & Construction Insights

Packaging robots can beat labor long term on cost, PMMI argues

Packaging robots can beat labor long term on cost, PMMI argues

PMMI's Tom Egan wrote in Processing Magazine that adding packaging automation and robotics can now be justified as more cost-effective over the long term than the high cost of labor in food, beverage and CPG plants. Separately, Packaging World describes AI-enabled AMRs from ABB and Agilox that automate material movement between packaging stations. The remaining gap is adoption among smaller manufacturers.

  • 01Two reference points for infrastructure-light material movement: ABB's Flexley Mover P603 carries 1,500 kg with sub-centimeter positioning and no floor markers, and Agilox's OFL lifts 800 kg pallets on peer-to-peer fleet software with no central traffic controller, per Packaging World.
  • 02The open ground is small and mid-sized manufacturers: MTC's Mike Wilson counts tens of thousands of UK SMEs with no robotic automation at all and expects cobots to take most of that growth.
  • 03A robotics business case should include procurement, not only line labor: a June 2026 China Journal of Accounting Research study found heavy robot adopters spread buying across more suppliers, gaining resilience but losing inventory efficiency and adding transaction costs.

Sep 18, 2026

Xtellio brings telematics to jobsite tools and heaters

Xtellio brings telematics to jobsite tools and heaters

Xtellio launched a two-tier telematics platform in March 2026: 32 battery-powered Xense sensors for small tools and wired Pro-Xentral devices for excavators, light towers and heaters. The company claims a 10-year battery life. Data is delivered through open APIs, which Xtellio frames as customer ownership of the data, aimed at rental and construction fleets where small assets have gone largely untracked.

  • 01Xtellio’s stated 10-year battery life for its Bluetooth Xense sensors is the key spec to test in the field; if it holds up, tagging hundreds of tools can look like a one-time install rather than a recurring battery-maintenance program.
  • 02For rental houses and contractors running mixed fleets, the sharper question is no longer which machines have telematics but whether the heaters, light towers and hand tools do, and whether that data lands in the same system.
  • 03Open APIs and “data liberation” are part of Xtellio’s pitch, and the coverage frames that as a prompt for RFP questions: what the APIs expose, where data can be sent, and whether customers can take historical data if they switch providers.

Sep 18, 2026

Senate bill would double smart water grants to $50 million a year

Senate bill would double smart water grants to $50 million a year

S. 2388, the Water Infrastructure Modernization Act of 2025, would double an EPA water tech pilot to $50 million a year through 2028. Grants would cover design, construction, training and operations for leak detection, advanced metering and AI analytics, WaterWorld reported. Planning and maintenance stay on the utility's tab.

  • 01Under S. 2388 as WaterWorld describes it, feasibility studies are not grant-eligible, so a utility would have to pay to build the case for a smart water project before applying for help building the project itself.
  • 02The bill's eligible list puts advanced digital design and construction management tools in the same bucket as meters and sensors, which would give a utility's capital delivery team a claim on the same grant as its field operations group.
  • 03The existing pilot program's authorization runs through 2026, per WaterWorld; the bill would extend it to 2028, and its last reported status was 'introduced' as of Aug. 12, 2025.

Sep 17, 2026

Explore More Engineering & Construction Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Engineering & Construction.

Browse Engineering & Construction Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Engineering & Construction and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512