Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEnergy

AI Failed At Writing Sci-Fi. Here’s Why Publishers May Just Want Them to Succeed

Recently, science fiction magazine Clarkesworld was forced to close submissions for authors after being flooded with stories written by AI tools. While it was clear that the AI failed at writing sci-fi, this failure pointed towards larger problem: AI-assisted plagiarism. Neil Clarke, the editor of Clarkesworld, said the amount of spam the magazine typically…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Energy teams put it to work with Customer Stories & Case Studies.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Energy?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Energy coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

Recently, science fiction magazine Clarkesworld was forced to close submissions for authors after being flooded with stories written by AI tools. While it was clear that the AI failed at writing sci-fi, this failure pointed towards larger problem: AI-assisted plagiarism.

Neil Clarke, the editor of Clarkesworld, said the amount of spam the magazine typically receives has increased drastically since ChatGPT was launched. The culprits, he believes, are not authors themselves — but rather, people who want to take advantage of the sci-fi community’s higher rates for authors and always-open submission windows.

Clarkesworld is not the only sci-fi magazine facing this problem. Asimov’s Science Fiction has also been receiving similar AI submissions. Some of them were so obviously written by AI that they actually had the same title.

While the AI tools failed at writing sci-fi, they are likely to improve with time. However, some experts believe the publishing world need not be worried, as improved technology and new cutting edge tools for creating or publishing written content has generally had a positive impact on readers and writers. Darren Campo, Senior Vice President of Programming and Content Strategy for The Food Network and Cooking Channel, Adjunct Assistant Professor at the NYU Stern School of Business, and author of the sci-fi series Alex Detail, tells us why anything (even disruptive technology) is great for the publishing world if it increases readership.

Darren’s Thoughts:

Science fiction magazines that publish short stories are now being inundated by stories written by AIs like Chat GPT. This is according to a recent article from The New York Times where they spoke to the editors at sci-fi magazines like Clarkesworld and Asimov’s Science Fiction. Now, according to the editors so far, these stories aren’t very good. They’re pretty easy to spot. They read more like a list of facts in a simple story format rather than something that a writer developed in his/her craft has written. However, it really won’t be long before AI is able to generate stories that are interesting to some people to read. So, how does this impact the publishing world?

Well, first we should ask, ‘How does this impact the reader? How has technology impacted readership in the past?’ A couple of big examples are the technologies that enabled for self-publishing. With self-publishing, we had books about subjects and characters that were not widely written about before, and that was great for readers. Another technology that allowed for the distribution of fan fiction over the internet led to things like 50 Shades of Grey, which was the highest selling book of its decade and inspired thousands of book clubs, movies about those book clubs, and other movies. So, that was also generally a net positive for both the reader and the publishing world.

So as this disruptive technology unfolds, it will eventually be a positive for the reader and anything that’s good and increases readership is great for the publishing world as well. As a science fiction writer myself, I am really looking forward to seeing how this all unfolds over the next few years.”

Article written by Aarushi Maheshwari.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Energy starts with a company putting its field engineers, operations leads, and project developers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Developers and operators shortlist on credibility, and your engineers give your sales team something real to send.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Energy, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Energy: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Energy buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Energy expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your field engineers, operations leads, and project developers into the articles, video, and social content Energy buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Energy Insights

Disconnected data can delay fuel-quality alerts, Titan Cloud says

Disconnected data can delay fuel-quality alerts, Titan Cloud says

This article draws on a Titan Cloud presentation. Its operational examples and product claims reflect the vendor’s account and should not be read as findings from a representative industry survey. Titan Cloud describes a scenario in which disconnected tank, delivery and maintenance records delay recognition of a fuel-quality problem until a customer reports it. The presentation argues that connecting those records can help operators investigate earlier and reduce operational disruption.

  • 01Disconnected data can delay fuel-quality alerts, Titan Cloud says.
  • 02The linked client video is the source for the vendor’s account; its claims are not independent industry benchmarks.
  • 03Operators can request evidence and test the proposed workflow against their own network’s needs before adopting it.

Sep 21, 2026

Titan Cloud describes organized fuel theft across multiple sites

Titan Cloud describes organized fuel theft across multiple sites

This article draws on a Titan Cloud presentation. Its operational examples and product claims reflect the vendor’s account and should not be read as findings from a representative industry survey. Michael Lewis, identified in the presentation as leading Titan Cloud’s international solutions consultancy team, describes coordinated fuel-theft scenarios involving multiple sites. His examples include dispenser manipulation, delivery losses and product adulteration. The scale described is the speaker’s account, not a measured industry-wide rate.

  • 01Titan Cloud describes organized fuel theft across multiple sites.
  • 02The Titan Cloud presentation is the source for the vendor’s account; its claims are not independent industry benchmarks.
  • 03Titan Cloud’s presenters argue that detecting coordinated theft and slow leaks depends on more frequent reconciliation and looking for patterns across the network, rather than ranking sites by raw loss volume.

Sep 21, 2026

Titan Cloud argues maintenance visibility affects EV charger availability

Titan Cloud argues maintenance visibility affects EV charger availability

Titan Cloud reports that CPOs it spoke with at Intercharge want better connections between charger monitoring, ticketing and field repairs. Its conference observations are a vendor perspective, not an industry-wide survey.

  • 01Titan Cloud argues that connecting fault reports with repair outcomes helps operators track whether chargers have returned to service and improve network operations.
  • 02The linked client video is the source for the vendor’s account; its claims are not independent industry benchmarks.
  • 03Operators can request evidence and test the proposed workflow against their own network’s needs before adopting it.

Sep 21, 2026

Explore More Energy Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Energy.

Browse Energy Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Energy and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512