Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

Video Games and Education: An Unlikely, but Sensible Partnership

Though parents and educators have long denounced video games as a waste of time, esports, or competitive play of popular video games such as Overwatch and League of Legends, is now considered a worthwhile pursuit that could help students open doors for the future. Forbes reported on data earlier this year which predicts esports revenue…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share
Video Games and Education: An Unlikely, but Sensible Partnership

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Education Technology?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Education Technology coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Though parents and educators have long denounced video games as a waste of time, esports, or competitive play of popular video games such as Overwatch and League of Legends, is now considered a worthwhile pursuit that could help students open doors for the future. Forbes reported on data earlier this year which predicts esports revenue to exceed $905 million by the end of 2018 and to surpass the $1 billion mark before the end of 2019.

In a January article aptly titled “Esports is the New College Football,” Forbes reported that more 18-25-year olds watch esports than traditional sport events such as the NBA Finals or the World Series.

Perhaps it should come as no surprise that increasing opportunities for students to compete on collegiate esports teams, and even to help pay for college with esports scholarships, are on the rise.

The National Association of Collegiate Esports is the predominant varsity esports governing body. The organization currently boasts over 80 member schools and has been instrumental to those schools’ awarding more than $9 million in scholarships and financial aid to students who compete on esports teams. To be sure, the move to lump esports in with traditional college sports is not without its opponents. John T. McNay, President of the Ohio Chapter of the American Association of University Presidents (AAUP) recently vilified the University of Akron in a letter for its ‘lack of judgment’ in implementing an esports program.1

However, it is easy to see the chief reasons colleges are taking the plunge and piloting programs regardless of what critics have to say. Many colleges have noted the overlap between involvement in esports and majoring in a STEM field, and hope that offering esports programs and scholarships will drive more high-achieving STEM students to matriculate.2

In addition, these schools hope to benefit from the media attention that highly publicized competitive esports events can bring them. After all, today’s teens are the primary audience that colleges must cater to to remain attractive in an age where the cost of college is skyrocketing, leading many of students and parents to question the value of a four-year degree.

Of course, esports do not merely benefit educational institutions. Students who participate have many of the same opportunities to build teamwork and communication skills as with any traditional team sport. EdTech has also pointed out that participation in esports teams help students to bolster their analytical thinking abilities and can provide them with opportunities to win large sums of money in tournament prize pools.

The increasing visibility of esports may still be shocking to some but makes perfect sense in the context of the greater push in education to ditch pencil and paper in favor of more immersive and engaging technology-based instruction. Case Western Reserve University’s Medical School program has pioneered the use of Microsoft HoloLens technology to teach anatomy, allowing students to visualize and interact with human body systems in a way they couldn’t using cadavers.

The coevolution of technology and education will surely continue to develop in ways none of us expect.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Education Technology Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Education Technology Insights

AI detectors are turning into audit tools, not enforcement, in higher ed

AI detectors are turning into audit tools, not enforcement, in higher ed

AI detection tools can be used to review student writing, but their results are not definitive. In 2026, colleges are putting more emphasis on AI literacy, assessment redesign and clear guidance for acceptable AI use than on detection alone.

  • 0186% student AI use (Digital Education Council survey, cited by Community College Daily) makes “ban and catch” workflows expensive at scale. Training, course design, and tool governance become the controllable levers.
  • 02OECD’s 2026 Outlook warns that better-looking work with GenAI can disappear or reverse on exams without it, a signal that assessment design is now a learning-outcomes control, not a pedagogy preference.

Sep 7, 2026

Workforce Pell will cover 8- to 15-week trades programs starting in July 2026

Workforce Pell will cover 8- to 15-week trades programs starting in July 2026

A final U.S. Department of Education rule makes 8- to 15-week training eligible for Pell Grants, effective July 20, 2026. Eligibility is tied to completion, employment, and earnings measures. For contractors and HR leaders, it adds a federal funding option for short-term technician training, if programs meet the rule’s standards.

  • 01The 70% completion and 70% employment thresholds turn Workforce Pell into a performance contract, not a blank-check subsidy, when selecting school partners.
  • 02For employers, written training agreements are now a procurement artifact: institutions can outsource up to 25% of instruction, and Registered Apprenticeship sponsors up to 49%, shaping how companies staff labs, instructors, and OJT.
  • 03State-by-state approval is the choke point. Governors and workforce boards decide which occupations qualify before federal sign-off, so multi-state employers will see uneven program availability.

Sep 5, 2026

Back-to-school IT teams are buying EdTech in a market where half the funding sits with 10 firms

Back-to-school IT teams are buying EdTech in a market where half the funding sits with 10 firms

New Market Pitch’s July 13, 2026 ranking says the top 10 EdTech startups hold about 50.2% of total funding in its filtered ranking; BYJU’S accounts for about 15.1% and is listed at about $6.0B raised. EdTech Digest’s 2011 profile of Wishbone describes an organization that links donors online with at-risk high school students to fund after-school and summer programs.

  • 01Funding tables can hide procurement risk: New Market Pitch lists some entries with “partial” confidence and flags “acquired” statuses without naming acquirers, so buyers should treat capital rankings as a starting point, not due diligence.
  • 02Some education initiatives behave like supply chains, not software: EdTech Digest’s description of Wishbone’s model highlights the operational work in vetting, publishing, funding, and progress updates, workflows that live outside the LMS.

Sep 4, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512