Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesProfessional AV

Genesys Aero Systems Explores Integrated Modular Avionics (IMA) and Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) in Latest Podcast Episode

In the recent episode of the Genesys podcast, sponsored by Genesys Aero Systems, industry experts delved into the fundamentals of Integrated Modular Avionics (IMA) and Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA). Hosted by Daniel Littwin, the discussion shed light on the key principles and components of IMA and MOSA, their differences, and how they interconnect. The…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Professional AV teams put it to work with Customer Stories & Case Studies.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Professional AV?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Professional AV coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

In the recent episode of the Genesys podcast, sponsored by Genesys Aero Systems, industry experts delved into the fundamentals of Integrated Modular Avionics (IMA) and Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA). Hosted by Daniel Littwin, the discussion shed light on the key principles and components of IMA and MOSA, their differences, and how they interconnect.

The panel featured three distinguished guests from Genesys Aero Systems: Scott Evers, Director of Programs and Customer Support; Gordon Pratt, Co-founder of the company; and John Fulanczyk, Director of Business Development. Together, they clarified the distinctions between IMA and MOSA, emphasizing that IMA is a technology or product, while MOSA is a design philosophy.

IMA integrates aircraft processing units into a single hardware module, allowing software functions and hardware functions to reside in one interconnected system. In contrast, MOSA is an approach that specifies how systems are designed, enabling multiple vendor solutions to work together seamlessly through standard interfaces.

Scott Evers explained that while IMA has become a standard for larger air vehicles, the adoption of this approach is still progressing, particularly in smaller and more cost-effective aircraft. The benefits of IMA include increased operational savings and the ability to easily add new features and capabilities to the air vehicle without extensive hardware upgrades.

John Fulanczyk highlighted that MOSA’s key advantage lies in its vendor-agnostic and interoperable nature. It allows for the substitution of functions within a system without the need to upgrade every piece of equipment on the aircraft. The focus of MOSA is on rigorously tested industry standards for communication interfaces, aiming to avoid proprietary solutions from specific avionics manufacturers.

The podcast episode was split into four parts, with more in-depth discussions to follow. Listeners were encouraged to visit the Genesys Aero Systems website for further information on IMA, MOSA, and their integration with modern avionics standards.

As the aviation industry continues to evolve, the Genesys podcast offers valuable insights into the latest advancements in aircraft technology and the benefits they bring to the aerospace community. Stay tuned for the next episode, where the Genesys Aero Systems team will provide further expertise on IMA and MOSA.

Video TranscriptExpand ↓

Hello, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the Genesis podcast brought to you by Genesis Aero systems. I'm your host Daniel Littwin, the voice of b to b, and folks thanks so much for joining us on this video conversation. Before we get into the meet of the episode. I want to make sure that you've got access to all of our previous conversations and some relevant supplemental information. So make sure you're heading to our website, Genesis dash aero systems dot com. Again, that's Genesis with a y dash aero systems dot com. You'll find plenty of other video conversations, white papers, blogs, resources, and information about our solutions and services there on the site. Alright. Let's jump into the meat of the episode. So on today's episode, we're going to give you all a crash course On the fundamentals of integrated modular avionics or IMA, which are today's standards for real time centralized aircraft processing units, and will also be giving you a crash course on modular open systems approach or MoSA, which is the standard technical and business strategy deployed even by the DOD for the implementation of Open Systems. So we've got a panel here with us today that's going to help us discuss the basic principles and key components of IMA and Mosa. Where they're different in scope and where they're interconnected. We'll also be breaking down the use of, for example, airing six fifty three embedded, partitioned operating systems, and the FAA TSO one fifty three classes of IMA. Avionics devices. So let's get into it, the high level and the highly technical. Here to help us understand these ecosystems of modular systems, I'm pleased to welcome our three Genesis Aero System, guests. First up, mister Scott Evers, director of programs and customer support. Scott. Great to have you here. How you doing? Glad to be here. Thanks, doing great. Yeah, real pleasure. We're also joined by Gordon Pratt, cofounder of the company, Gordon. How you doing? Great. Great to be as well. Yeah, man. Thank you for joining us. And last but not least, mister John Fulanczyk. He is director of business development at Genesis. Great to have you, John. How are you doing? I'm doing well down there. Thank you. Good to be here. Fantastic. So thanks again to Scott Gordon and John for joining us here on the podcast. Got quite a lot to cover, so I want to jump right into it. Gordon, my first question is for you. Let's just draw the distinction a little clearly, what is the difference between MoSA and IMA? Break that down for us. Sure, Daniel. IMA Integrated Modular avionics is a technology or a product, whereas MoSA, the modular Open Systems approach is a design philosophy. Right. So Moza, like the DOD uses Moza to to specify how it's going to design systems. And then once they have that design, it may or may not include an IMA type device in it. Whereas an IMA device being integrated, modular avionics can have software functions, hardware functions. They can be all residing in one box. They can be in different parts of the aircraft. But the point is that they're all tightly connected. Now, Scott, for you, I know there are, you know, obviously, a lot of different kinds of avionics systems or not just one standard or, you know, even one way to define which buckets of, you know, aircraft solutions actually categorize themselves as avionics. So where does IMA differ from conventional avionics and sort of the current suite of what gets categorized as avionics equipment. Okay. Sure. As Gordon mentioned, the the traditional avionics are are more distributed, a bunch of different hardware, each having their own functionality dedicated to that piece of hardware. Sure. IMA allows you to put the processing into one common hardware module and and run the software at the lower level that runs that hardware. Autonomous of the software application that would do that would bring the capability separately. So what you can do is is layer in above that lower level. The the new features, the capabilities independently on top of that software, and and they can run wherever that hardware on the air vehicle is located. Right. So they could be in one time in one location if that fails, the software could actually adapt and run over in that same common hardware in a different part of the airplane or if it's located in the same location it could run there too. It it allows you to add those features more easily out at the air vehicle instead of having to send hardware back to the lab or upgrade the hardware or even the the base software. Yeah. And I mentioned this earlier, you know, calling it the standard of avionics today. Would you agree that IMA is already being treated as a standard in the industry? Or is it still sort of on its path to becoming the standard approach for an avionics ecosystem? I would say today is it's been adopted as a standard for the larger air vehicles -- Yeah. -- primarily on the civil and commercial side. At the the smaller lower cost fair vehicles. They're they're still more federated independent systems. Gotcha. But we're we're trying to head that way more so we can adapt to the the larger more expensive vehicles because there's there there's more concern there about the operating savings associated with an IMA type approach. Gotcha. Okay. Now, John, question for you. In terms of Mosa, Obviously, it's not an actually an equipment term. It is a solutions architecture framework. How does it compare to other approaches to integrating systems, whether that's open systems or otherwise, go and give us your perspective. Right in the name, Moce. Modular open systems approach -- Mhmm. -- emphasis on approach. It's a methodology that is allowing DOD primarily to multi source solutions that would hang on an aircraft from different vendors that'll all work together in concert with each other, operate on standard interfaces. There's a tremendous amount of latitude from the people making acquisitions within the Department of Defense as to how do they define what implement implementing the approach. But that's its overarching goal is to be an approach that allows multi vendor sourcing to run on standard interface or or within a standard set of interface. Right. So then what would you say is the key benefit of having that sort of vendor agnostic approach, that interoperable approach, that open systems approach. Right? Yeah. So think there's there's several. I think the most obvious one is you're now able to treat a fully integrated solution on an aircraft -- Right. -- as as you would have formally treated something federated. Meaning, you could take a function out of the equation and substitute a new function back into that equation and have it run on the same architecture without having to upgrade every piece of equipment on the aircraft, which had historically been more than norm within the the customers that that are impacted by Moosa. Gotcha. So What are the essential components of a Mosa system or a Mosa approach? Right? I guess, break down that ecosystem. Yeah. It's really about the it's about the interfaces. Okay. Those are the major components. Whether they be airing four twenty nine interfaces or RS two thirty two interfaces, some of the more standard that have been around in the industry for a long time or interfaces that get developed specifically for avionics. Within the RTCA. I cannot remember what the acronym stands for. Sure. But but it's it's all about the interfaces and then devices coming from multiple sources hanging on to those, connecting up to those interfaces. Makes sense. So building the foundation and then allowing, again, that sort of interoperable approach for different systems. There isn't no one piece of hardware required for something to be bay for a Moosa solution to be based upon. Right. It's encouraged that there be an operating system in the in an IMA for example that is Aering six fifty three compliant. Sure. But that's not an absolute requirement of the approach. Yeah. The approach really focuses on on rigorously tested industry standards for for communication between the different functions. Right. So they wanna really avoid proprietary proprietary solutions provided by a specific manufacturer, a specific avionics manufacturer. Well, that's not the end of the conversation folks, but we are gonna take a short break because we're actually gonna be splitting this podcast up into four parts. That's right. Four different parts for our conversation on IMA, Moza, with the Genesis Aero systems team. So make sure that you're heading to our website, genesis dash aero systems dot com. Again, that's Genesis dash aero systems dot com for more information on the podcast, but also to catch up a little bit on our solutions and services and how they integrate with this modern standard for modern avionics. So we'll catch you on the next episode. I'm your host, Daniel Littwin, the voice of b to b, make sure you tune in for the rest of this conversation with the Genesis team.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Professional AV starts with a company putting its integrators, design engineers, and product specialists on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

When a spec writer or facilities lead searches this category, your integrators are what they find instead of a competitor.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Professional AV Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Professional AV: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Professional AV buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Professional AV expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your integrators, design engineers, and product specialists into the articles, video, and social content Professional AV buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Professional AV Insights

AV integrators are buying scale because meeting rooms now run like software

AV integrators are buying scale because meeting rooms now run like software

Forté’s acquisition of Vega Global, adding more than 750 employees across 17 APAC countries, is a prominent 2026 sign of consolidation in enterprise AV, according to AV Magazine. At InfoComm 2026, Cisco, Crestron and HP showed room platforms centered on ongoing management, with Cisco and NVIDIA introducing RoomOS 26 AI agents that run on in-room hardware and HP tying Poly Lens to its Workforce Experience Platform, as reported by AVIXA and HP. Separately, Cisco’s Webex AI roadmap adds “agentic” automation and governance that reaches beyond room systems into the contact center and workforce management, according to No Jitter. As a result, standards, telemetry, security and service-level performance are taking a larger role in how contracts are evaluated, influencing both vendor choice and integrator consolidation.

  • 01When services are 38% of channel revenue and hardware is 36%, the integrator RFP stops being about the bill of materials and starts being about uptime, monitoring and lifecycle outcomes, per AV Magazine citing AVIXA channel research.
  • 02“Edge AI in the room” shifts how outages and performance issues play out: RoomOS 26 adds on-device agents and features such as Audio Zones that can lessen reliance on cloud connectivity, but it also increases requirements for endpoint compute, device governance and disciplined update processes, according to AVIXA and rAVe [PUBS].
  • 03Consolidation is becoming a procurement feature: Forté’s move from a federation model to owned operations signals multinationals want one throat to choke for standards, security and service outcomes across regions, per AV Magazine.

Sep 1, 2026

Sony’s BRAVIA Pro displays run VITEC Avedia IPTV with no external media player

Sony’s BRAVIA Pro displays run VITEC Avedia IPTV with no external media player

Sony Electronics and VITEC announced a global integration that lets Sony BRAVIA professional displays run VITEC’s Avedia IPTV and digital signage software natively, eliminating external media players, according to PR Newswire and AV Magazine. Management runs through VITEC’s CMS, and the companies say it can scale to thousands of displays across corporate, hospitality, healthcare, venues, and public facilities, per PR Newswire and invidis. For enterprise IT and facilities teams, the practical shift is a new procurement and governance model: treat “display plus software” as one Android-based endpoint, then manage it like an IT fleet with fewer devices to install but stricter expectations around app lifecycle, security requirements, and vendor roadmaps. The announcement also lands alongside Sony’s previously reported Bravia Inc. joint venture with TCL, which invidis says will move operational control in April 2027, a reminder that longer-running display deployments should track who sets the roadmap over the life of the fleet.

  • 01Player-less IPTV changes the bill of materials: endpoints shift from “screen + player + mounts + power” to a single managed display, which can compress install labor and reduce failure points.
  • 02The phrase “thousands of displays” (PR Newswire) is the right scale test: if the CMS and network design cannot handle a four-digit endpoint count, this architecture won’t match the promise.
  • 03Sony’s display governance is expected to change in 2027 under the TCL-led Bravia Inc. venture (invidis). For deployments that will still be operating then, teams should address it now as part of contract terms.

Sep 1, 2026

AIMS adds Bolin Technology and ITDev to advance IPMX implementation

AIMS adds Bolin Technology and ITDev to advance IPMX implementation

Bolin Technology, a PTZ camera maker, and ITDev, an FPGA design firm, have joined the Alliance for IP Media Solutions (AIMS) to support IPMX and open AV-over-IP interoperability. AIMS leadership says the additions ground IPMX work in real-world implementation, from endpoint hardware to the FPGA IP used in gateways and processing nodes.

  • 01Bolin Technology and ITDev joined AIMS in late August to support IPMX and open AV-over-IP standards.
  • 02Bolin supplies PTZ cameras and AV-over-IP products supporting NDI, Dante AV, and Fast HEVC; ITDev is an Altera and AMD FPGA design services and IP partner for IPMX, SMPTE ST 2110, and video processing.
  • 03The article advises buyers to ask vendors how IPMX support will be provided (native silicon, FPGA, gateway, or software stack) and to make certification and interoperability testing part of acceptance criteria.

Aug 29, 2026

Explore More Professional AV Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Professional AV.

Browse Professional AV Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Professional AV and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512