Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesProfessional AV

Financial Stressors’ Impact on High Yield and Bank Loans

The Impact of 1Q 2023 Financial Stressors on High Yield and Bank Loan Securities First quarter of 2023 presented significant volatility within the Financials sector, due to the crisis of confidence in regional banks and the subsequent demise of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) specifically―the largest bank failure since Lehman Brothers in 2008. SVB’s failure created…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Professional AV teams put it to work with Customer Stories & Case Studies.

Share

The Impact of 1Q 2023 Financial Stressors on High Yield and Bank Loan Securities

First quarter of 2023 presented significant volatility within the Financials sector, due to the crisis of confidence in regional banks and the subsequent demise of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) specifically―the largest bank failure since Lehman Brothers in 2008. SVB’s failure created risk within the banking system, which resulted in volatility in all asset classes across the board―including high yield and bank loans.

The Fed quickly stepped in to inject liquidity into the system, notably through their bank lending facility which allowed banks to pledge their securities to the Fed at par value in order to gain liquidity to pay depositors that wanted to withdraw their funds from the banks.

Deposit outflows have slowed, and the first week of April brought an increase in deposits at banks. Accordingly, we are beginning to see liquidity risk wane. And importantly, we consider SVB to be a one-off situation given its business mix―a high percentage of securities portfolio relative to all other banks as well as large percentage of uninsured deposits that it held. Therefore, we do not see this as a systemic risk for which we should be concerned.

Indirect Impacts to High Yield and Bank Loans

At a high level, there is very little direct impact to the high yield and bank loan markets, however, there are some notable indirect effects that should be considered.

First, the securities portfolios owned by SVB are prevalent across the banking industry. However, they tend to be 5% to 20% of the banks’ total assets versus the 93.8% of SVB’s total assets. Barrow Hanley Credit Partners have discussed this dynamic previously, and we consider these assets to be “dead capital” on banks’ balance sheets. This dead capital is going to reduce banks’ ability to lend in the near to intermediate term. Additionally, the volatility in deposits, as seen with SVB and Signature Bank, further decreases the willingness of banks to lend into the current environment. We view this as a reduction of monetary velocity in the system, which should be considered as it will increase volatility across asset classes.

Second, the failure of SVB reduced the market’s expectations of the Fed increasing rates to quell inflation. That reduction is approximately 30 basis points for the peak, falling from 5.4% to 5.1% and expecting one hike from the Fed to the end of 2023 with the expectation declining approximately 40 basis points from approximately 5.1% to 5.7% looking forward. This impacts loans and the forward coupon loans their expected forward coupons.

Third, is the scrutiny that has been brought upon Commercial Real Estate assets (CREs) in this environment, and how the quality of those CRE assets is likely to impact banks and their willingness to lend. It’s important to note that small banks – those $10 billion and under – have larger exposure to CRE lending. It makes up about one third of their balance sheets.

Moving up in size, CRE lending comprises about 15% of regional banks’ balance sheets and less than 10% for large banks. Given these numbers, we believe the risk of losses and impairments to banks’ balance sheets is low, as lending centers have been much more conservative post Great Financial Crisis (GFC) versus pre GFC. Currently, CREs are cash-flowing assets relative to what we saw during the GFC, when mortgage defaults were more common, and assets were owned by individuals.

Regardless, we continue to assess and reassess this risk to protect our portfolios.

Where do High Yield and Bank Loans Sit in this Environment?

At the end of April 2023, High Yield sits at roughly 8.5% yield-to-worst with a 475-basis point spread. We think this is an attractive return and will compete extremely well with forward-looking expected returns relative to other asset classes – fixed income as well as equity.

There are currently several dynamics working in favor of High Yield to reduce risks within the High Yield market during this cycle versus prior cycles: An increase of BB issues within the market, providing a higher-quality asset mix; an increase in secured bond exposure within the BB universe, providing additional safety; and higher-quality businesses issuing the bonds.

Within the same period, Bank Loans sit at roughly 9.7% yield-to-worst with a 600-basis point spread. Like High Yield, we have seen an increase in quality of the underlying issuers within the Bank Loan market, with many smaller issuers moving into the private credit markets. While these companies are more impacted by the increase in interest rates, they have also experienced significantly more financial flexibility over the past 15 years, enjoying higher margins and lower capital expenditures (CapEx) as a percentage of the businesses themselves.

Barrow Hanley Credit Partners have modelled out all the loans we own within our strategies to about 6% of the Fed Funds (or SOFR) rate. We believe that there will likely be higher default rates in Bank Loans relative to High Yield, but we also think the vast majority of the issuers within the Index will be able to manage through these higher rates. In terms of anticipated default rates, we predict mid to single-digit defaults from Bank Loans, but note the incremental spread earned from Bank Loans already accounts for a vast majority of this risk.

In short, Bank Loans are currently providing an extra 125 basis points relative to High Yield via a high-cash-flow asset. The current coupon within Bank Loans is 8.6% average dollar price of 93, making current yield for Bank Loans about 9.25%. We think this is very attractive relative to other asset classes.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

All opinions included in this report constitute Barrow Hanley’s (BH) judgment as of the time of issuance of this report and are subject to change without notice. This report was prepared by Barrow Hanley with information it believes to be reliable. This report is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security, nor a recommendation of services supplied by any money management organization. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Barrow Hanley is a value-oriented investment manager, providing services to institutional clients.

Barrow Hanley Credit Partners is a legally assumed name for the Alternative Credit investment team and investment strategies of Barrow Hanley Global Investors, including Bank Loan Fixed Income, Collateralized Loan Obligations, and High Yield Fixed Income.

Video TranscriptExpand ↓

Right my name is Nicholas, portfolio manager of bear Hanley, currently below investment grade asset classes. High yield bonds of average loans. I am here today to talk to you about the recent market volatility, specifically some recent bank failures, how that impacts the high yield loan market. High level there is very little direct impact into the high yield loan market, but there are some notable indirect impacts that I want to talk about. So first, let's start. Sb was the largest bank failure since Lehman, and it created the risk in the system that actually we saw pretty significant volatility within equity markets, high markets, loan markets, that basically all asset classes across the board. The Fed was pretty quick to step in and inject liquidity into the system and notably through their bank lending facility, which allowed banks to pledge their securities at par value to the banks and/or to the Fed in order to gain liquidity to pay depositors that wanted out of the banks. We have actually started to see deposit outflows slow and first week in April actually saw an increase in deposits at banks. And so you're starting to see the risk of this way. And SBB was a little bit of a one off situation, given its mix, that high percentage of securities portfolio relative to all other banks as well as the uninsured, other mix that it saw. So I don't think that this is a systemic risk that we need to be concerned about. But those indirect risks that I was mentioning before, one, you know, those securities portfolios are prevalent across banks, but they tend to be in the 5% to 20% of total assets of banks. Now, if you followed us for a while, we have talked about this dynamic and we do think that this is just dead capital on banks' balance sheet, which is going to reduce the ability of banks to lend in the near to intermediate term future. Add on top of that the deposit volatility that we've seen with SPV and signature. And that further increases the willingness of banks to lend into this current environment. So we view that as dead capital. We've kind talked about that in a few times, but view that as more of a reducing of monetary velocity within the system, something that we need to be aware of and is going to add to volatility just across asset classes. Two is rate expectations. With SB B's failure, we actually saw a significant decline in future respect actions and the kind of reduction of markets expectations of the Fed increasing rates in order to quell inflation. So starting, you know, that reduction actually is about 30 basis points for the peak, going from 5.4 to about 5.1% So now expecting one hike from the bat to the end of 2023. That expectation declined about 40 basis points from about 5.1%, about 5.7% like before. So that more impacts loans and that forward looking coupon that loans are likely to see. The third indirect aspect is really highlighting asset quality in this environment that particularly what's been brought to light is, you know, kind of scrutiny across CRB portfolios and how that is likely to impact banks and the willingness to lend. Now small banks, $10 billion and under have got larger exposure to CRT lending. That's roughly about a third of their balance sheet. And as you move up in larger in size regional banks of about 15% and roughly, you know, kind of large banks have less than 10% So, you know, when we look at the risk to bank balance sheets and the risk of losses and impairments, we actually do think that is fairly low. But we're continually assessing and reassessing this risk. Lending centers have been much more conservative post GFC versus pre GFC and we will step back and listen at these assets. These are cash flowing assets relative to what we saw kind of GFC time frame where mortgages tend to be not cash flow and assets owned by the individual. So the however high yield won't actually sit-in this current environment. High yield sits at roughly 8.5% yield to worse. So the 475 basis point spread, we think that is very attractive and is likely going to compete extremely well with forward looking expected returns relative to other asset classes, other fixed income, asset class as well as equities assets. And a couple of the dynamics that we actually view as been being risk mitigating within the high yield market is, you know, we have seen an increase in double b, so higher quality mix within the market itself, an increase in secured bond exposure within that and just a higher quality business as issuer within the high yield market. So we think these dynamics are actually risk reducing in this cycle versus prior cycles. Now within loans, we said at 9.7% yield or worse, at a 600 basis point spread. Now, again, we have seen a significant increase in quality of underlying issuer within the loan space itself. And a lot of those smaller issuers have actually gone over to the private credit world. And so when we look at these companies are more directly impacted by the increase in your. Rates but there has been significant increase in financial flexibility over the past 15 years that these companies have seen, again, higher margins, lower CapEx as a percentage of the business itself. So that financial flexibility is just increased over time. And so we have modeled out all of these loans that we are on to. About a 6% of that bonds are separate. We do think there is likely going to be higher default rates within loans relative to high yield. But we think the vast majority of the index is actually going to be able to manage through these higher rates. And so we expect kind of mid-single digit default rates coming from loans. But you are sure you do see that incremental spread that you earn from loans already accounting for a vast majority of that risk. So extra 125 basis points in loans relative to high yields and you're just earning a very high cash flow asset right now. The current coupon within loans is by our sort of 8.6% average dollar price of 93. So current yield for loans is 9 and 1/4. We think this is a very attractive and again kind of think loan set with high yield and likely to outperform through this cycle relative to other asset classes, alternatives that investors have for them. Any any additional questions? We are we're stand here ready to serve. Appreciate your time. Thank you.

Professional AV: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Professional AV buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Professional AV Insights

How a Fortune 500 company built a broadcast-ready conference space with Avidex

How a Fortune 500 company built a broadcast-ready conference space with Avidex

Avidex recently completed a project for a Fortune 500 company to create a broadcast-ready conference space. This development addresses the growing demand for live events, streaming, and hybrid engagement in corporate settings. The project highlights the need for advanced technology infrastructure in modern corporate communications.

  • 01Avidex developed a conference space for a Fortune 500 company.
  • 02The space is designed to support live events and hybrid engagements.
  • 03Advanced technology infrastructure is crucial for modern corporate communications.

Jul 10, 2026

The Most Important AV Upgrade in Your Church Might Be Behind the Walls

The advancement of audio-visual (AV) technology in churches often goes unnoticed as the most critical upgrades might be hidden behind walls. Ben Thomas, associated with Windy City Wire, highlights the significance of investing in these unseen yet vital components. Proper infrastructure ensures that the overall AV experience in churches is seamless and effective.

  • 01Critical AV upgrades are often hidden behind walls.
  • 02Infrastructure investments are vital for effective church AV experiences.
  • 03Ben Thomas is associated with Windy City Wire.

Jul 9, 2026

The Most Important AV Upgrade in Your Church Might Be Behind the Walls

The Most Important AV Upgrade in Your Church Might Be Behind the Walls

The article discusses the significance of audiovisual (AV) upgrades in churches, emphasizing that often the most crucial upgrades are not visible on the surface. It explores the importance of the behind-the-scenes technology that supports the overall AV system. The piece aims to inform church decision-makers about optimizing their AV infrastructure.

  • 01The most important AV upgrades in churches may be hidden behind walls.
  • 02Behind-the-scenes technology is crucial for supporting AV systems.
  • 03Church decision-makers should focus on optimizing AV infrastructure.

Jul 9, 2026

Explore More Professional AV Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Professional AV.

Browse Professional AV Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Professional AV and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512