Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesIndustrial IoT

Prince SCADA System case study

Operators at Prince faced challenges due to scattered information across different platforms. The SCADA System case study explores how centralized data improved operational efficiency. The study highlights the importance of integrated information systems in industrial settings.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Industrial IoT teams put it to work with AI Visibility (GEO).

By John Claman ·
Share

Key takeaways

01

Operators struggled with accessing scattered information.

02

Centralized data led to improved operational efficiency.

03

The case study underlines the need for integrated systems.

Free workspace

Turn your Industrial IoT expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

For years, operators on Prince's shop floor faced a familiar but costly problem: the information they needed to do their jobs was scattered. Programs lived in one place, blueprints in another, operation sheets somewhere else entirely. Getting set up at a station meant hunting across file folders, icons, and systems before any actual work could begin. The inefficiency was measurable, the frustration was real, and the solution proved elusive for more than a decade.

That changed when Prince partnered with KASA Controls and Automation to implement a SCADA system designed around how the shop floor actually operates. The core idea was straightforward: tie all relevant documentation and program data to a model number, then surface it automatically as a product moves down the line. When the system recognizes what is in front of a machine, it delivers everything the operator needs, op sheets, blueprints, and program files, to a single screen without any manual searching.

Centralizing data from existing sources

A significant part of the implementation involved pulling data that already existed inside Prince's infrastructure. The engineering server, the ERP system, and other internal repositories held valuable information that was simply not accessible in a practical way from the production floor. Working with KASA, Prince was able to mine those existing sources and bring the relevant data together into one locally accessible location.

We learned a lot about mining for data in several of our existing locations such as the engineering server and our ERP system. We were able to bring a lot of that information, again, locally into one site so it could be viewed easily. — Prince Plant Manager

The visual management benefit was equally important. Supervisors and operators gained a clear, real-time overview of what work was being done and when, something that had previously required piecing together information from multiple disconnected systems. That kind of operational visibility is difficult to put a precise value on, but its impact on decision-making and floor coordination is direct.

Setup time and the people behind the process

The most immediate measurable outcome was a reduction in setup times. Because the system automatically prompts the correct programs and documentation based on product recognition, operators no longer spend time gathering materials before a job begins. That time compounds across shifts and stations, making it a meaningful operational gain rather than a marginal one.

For me, it was all about the people on the shop floor, the employees, giving them what they need to try to be successful in what they're doing. — Prince Plant Foreman

Prince first raised the need for a unified information system with its corporate office in 2011. The search for the right solution took years, and what ultimately made the KASA partnership work was less about technology specs and more about alignment. The Prince team described KASA as genuinely attentive, noting that conversations about requirements felt collaborative rather than transactional. The result is a system now running at full operational capacity, delivering on a goal that took over a decade to realize.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Industrial IoT starts with a company putting its controls engineers, plant-floor specialists, and integration partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Plant and controls buyers research deep before contact, and your engineers get to shape that research.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

JC
John ClamanSales Representative & Marketing Supervisor, Kasa/IntelliFinishing
B2B Weekly

The week in Industrial IoT, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Industrial IoT: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Industrial IoT buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Industrial IoT expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your controls engineers, plant-floor specialists, and integration partners into the articles, video, and social content Industrial IoT buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Industrial IoT Insights

Matt Kelly says packaging automation pays back under two years

Matt Kelly says packaging automation pays back under two years

Matt Kelly and Joe Bradley argue brownfield warehouses often speed up picking while leaving packing manual. SupplyChainBrain reported in June 2026 that Kelly said service-model packaging projects can pay back in as little as one month and capital projects in under two years. Sparck's published 3-second boxing benchmark shows why operators still need a workflow-by-workflow comparison.

  • 01SupplyChainBrain reported in June 2026 that Kelly said some service-model packaging projects can pay back in as little as one month and capital projects in under two years.
  • 02Bradley says BoxLast can work from a license plate ID, a unique order identifier, so the machine can print and apply a shipping label without preloading weights and dimensions.
  • 03Sparck benchmarks, up to 20 stations and a box every 3 seconds, illustrate why operators must compare throughput, staffing and machine scope.

Oct 2, 2026

For constant plant-floor process streams, a data historian is often a better fit than SQL Server or Oracle

For constant plant-floor process streams, a data historian is often a better fit than SQL Server or Oracle

Precedence Research values industrial IoT at USD 602.87B in 2026 and projects 16.8% CAGR to 2035, adding pressure to handle growing sensor data volumes.

  • 01Precedence Research values the industrial IoT market at USD 602.87 billion in 2026, growing 16.8% a year to 2035, so plant data streams keep getting larger.
  • 02In Schmidt’s example, historians can store a timestamped point when a value changes (skipping repeats), while logging every repeated reading in a relational table can increase storage and slow time-window reports.
  • 03Historians such as AVEVA PI handle capture; CrateDB argues cross-plant analytics often sits beside the historian, and Tiger Data notes teams want SQL/dashboards while generic relational tables can degrade as they grow.

Sep 30, 2026

CED: Specify holding brakes where gravity can move a servo axis

CED: Specify holding brakes where gravity can move a servo axis

CED’s Nicholas Rodacz demonstrates spring-set servo holding brakes. Selection requires the correct torque rating and manufacturer instructions; the bench demonstration does not replace a machine risk assessment or establish personnel safety.

  • 01A spring-set holding brake is intended to hold a stationary shaft within its rated torque; it is not automatically a safety brake.
  • 02Gravity and other stored energy should prompt checks of load holding, torque and any required safety measures.
  • 03Use the exact motor specification and manufacturer inspection procedure. Hand-turning a shaft is not a sufficient brake-identification or safety acceptance test.

Sep 30, 2026

Explore More Industrial IoT Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Industrial IoT.

Browse Industrial IoT Hub

About the Expert

JC
John Claman

Sales Representative & Marketing Supervisor

Kasa/IntelliFinishing

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Industrial IoT and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512