Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Intermittent Fasting: Understanding the Science Behind the Health Phenomenon

Amidst the ever-evolving landscape of health and nutrition, intermittent fasting emerges as a promising contender, with a growing body of research striving to uncover its full potential and implications. A recent surge of research has illuminated the potential benefits of this time-restricted eating pattern, making it more than just a passing trend. But what do…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

Amidst the ever-evolving landscape of health and nutrition, intermittent fasting emerges as a promising contender, with a growing body of research striving to uncover its full potential and implications. A recent surge of research has illuminated the potential benefits of this time-restricted eating pattern, making it more than just a passing trend. But what do the studies really say?

Intermittent fasting in its most basic form involves going without food for a specific period, often ranging from 16 to 24 hours. Studies have shown that this eating pattern may lead to various health benefits, including improved heart health, better blood sugar regulation, and even increased lifespan. With a plethora of health benefits, some researchers, like Johns Hopkins Medicine neuroscientist Mark Mattson, Ph.D, suggest that intermittent fasting could even become part of standard medical advice alongside healthy diets and exercise.

However, it’s important to note that not all intermittent fasting methods are created equal. For example, the 5:2 fasting approach, which involves eating normally for five days and restricting calories for two, might be more effective than simply shortening your daily eating window. 

Is intermittent fasting the game-changer diet we’ve been waiting for in the realm of health and wellness? Or, does the science behind this wellness trend reveal a more nuanced understanding of its true benefits to bodily health? Joanna Chodorowska, holistic sports nutritionist and owner of Nutrition in Motion LLC, asserts that for intermittent fasting to truly be effective, it is essential to consider other crucial factors, such as proper nutrition.

Joanna’s Thoughts:

“Hi, I’m Joanna Chodorowska, a whole body health nutritionist, and I recently read the Women’s Day article about intermittent fasting, which provided five points on how intermittent fasting can improve your health. The one that resonated with me the most is point number four, where Dr Jason Fung mentioned intermittent fasting on its own can improve factors like insulin regulation, but if you’re eating highly processed, very high-calorie foods with little nutritional benefit, you’re not going to see many improvements from simply changing your eating window. And I would agree with that.

My viewpoint is that intermittent fasting alone is not the panacea for improving diabetes, cardiovascular function or antioxidant function; you have to eat real food, you have to balance the blood sugar, you have to include anti-inflammatory foods, eat antioxidant-rich foods and move your body to get the full benefits of intermittent fasting.

Just fasting alone will not do all that the article suggests. It can increase the benefits, but only if you include a balanced nutrition program that includes real food and exercise along with the intermittent fasting window, especially as you get older, over 50.”

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Healthcare Insights

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are choosing alliances over mergers, per a July McDermott Will & Schulte analysis and four July deals tracked by Becker's Hospital Review. St. Christopher's, Nemours, Jefferson and Temple signed a nonbinding alliance letter; Palomar UC San Diego Health launched July 1. Ownership stays put; governance, purchasing and outpatient investment absorb the change.

  • 01In an alliance, the contract does the integrating that an org chart does in a merger: McDermott Will & Schulte says governance design, exclusivity, antitrust review, community commitments and exit rights all have to be settled before signing.
  • 02Purchasing is now explicitly on the table in at least one no-ownership deal, the St. Peter's Health and Billings Clinic-Logan Health talks in Montana, which means shared supply contracts can arrive without a change of control.

Sep 19, 2026

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

An Ophthalmology Times commentary by T.Y. Alvin Liu, Ferdinand Hui and Phillip Phan sorts eye patients into three telemedicine tiers by clinical need. Patients needing regular OCT scans benefit less unless a home device can send the image. Video tools already sit inside Epic and Cerner; the deciding purchase for retina clinics is the imaging device in the patient's living room.

  • 01The dividing line for eye telemedicine is imaging, not video: patients who need regular OCT scans benefit less from remote visits unless a device at home can send the scan, so a video license alone shifts few of those encounters.
  • 02The provider-side requirement, a HIPAA-compliant secured video platform, was already built into Epic and Cerner by 2020; the patient-side requirements (1.5 MB up and down bandwidth, a quiet private room, comfort with the technology) sit outside the health system's control and are the ones worth screening for at scheduling.
  • 03Self-administered home color fundus photography for tracking non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy was named as the nearer route into retina telemedicine; home OCT for wet AMD is the harder gate and the device to watch.

Sep 19, 2026

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Wolters Kluwer Health argues value-based care software is judged on whether customers hit incentive thresholds and avoid penalties. A Fierce Healthcare-reported survey it cites puts value-based care at a quarter or more of revenue for 30% of organizations. The analysis is a vendor publication that ends by pitching its own UpToDate Connect API.

  • 01The sharper question for any population health or care coordination platform is whether it changes what a clinician does at the moment of decision, or only reports afterward what happened. Wolters Kluwer's reading of the evidence is that many platforms still struggle with the first.
  • 02Vendors selling into value-based contracts now face a build-or-license decision on clinical content, because Wolters Kluwer names current, trusted content, consistent clinician adoption across sites, and a traceable link from guidance to quality metrics as the three hard problems.

Sep 18, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512