Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Interchangeable biosimilars cut drug spend only when pharmacies can actually switch them

The FDA’s interchangeable biosimilar pathway is moving from a one-off insulin milestone to a repeatable playbook for pharmacy-level substitution, with Wezlana (ustekinumab-auub) approved as interchangeable to Stelara in late 2023 and a first interchangeable biosimilar to golimumab reported in September 2026. Evidence from a JAMA Health Forum economic evaluation cited by Podiatry Today found that insulin glargine interchangeability in November 2021 was followed by an immediate jump of more than 47,000 prescriptions for Semglee and insulin glargine-yfgn, suggesting the designation itself can change dispensing behavior. For hospitals, health systems, and payers, the operational consequence shows up less in the FDA letter and more in formulary design, NDC-level claims logic, pharmacy notification requirements that vary by state, and the inventory and education workflows that make substitution predictable instead of chaotic.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By MarketScale Newsroom · FdaBiosimilarsInterchangeable BiosimilarPharmacy Operations
Share
Learn this in 60 seconds

Key facts, context, and what it means, in one minute.

:60
0:001:00
Interchangeable biosimilars cut drug spend only when pharmacies can actually switch them

Key takeaways

01

Interchangeability is a workflow change, not a clinical debate. The systems that decide spend are NDC mapping, e-prescribe defaults, and pharmacy switch rules governed by state law.

02

The pipeline is widening beyond diabetes. Wezlana’s interchangeability to Stelara (Healthcare Purchasing News) and a newly reported interchangeable golimumab biosimilar (Journal of Healthcare Management/AJN via Ovid) signal more specialty and infusion-adjacent categories will face pharmacy-level substitution decisions.

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Interchangeability has stopped being a novelty. It’s becoming a lever that pharmacy and payer ops teams can actually pull, but only if their switching, claims, and inventory systems are built to handle it.

The latest signal is category breadth. In October 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Amgen’s Wezlana (ustekinumab-auub) as a biosimilar to and interchangeable with Janssen’s Stelara (ustekinumab) across multiple inflammatory indications, including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, according to Healthcare Purchasing News. In September 2026, a Drug Watch item in AJN, published by the Journal of Healthcare Management and accessed via Ovid, reported the FDA approved golimumab-sldi as the first interchangeable biosimilar to golimumab for severely active rheumatoid arthritis (in combination with methotrexate) and moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.

The operational point: interchangeability changes who has to decide, and when

A standard biosimilar decision often lands with P&T committees, specialty pharmacy, prior authorization, and prescriber education. Interchangeability shifts some of that decision-making downstream to dispensing, because the FDA designation enables pharmacy-level substitution without contacting the prescriber, although state pharmacy laws still control the exact mechanics, as both Healthcare Purchasing News and Managed Healthcare Executive note in their coverage of FDA explanations.

That difference sounds legalistic until it hits the shop floor. For hospital pharmacies and health-system outpatient pharmacies, it affects how substitution logic is configured in dispensing software, how e-prescribing messages are interpreted, and how staff handle patient notification and prescriber “dispense as written” signals where state rules require them. For payers and PBMs, it shows up as NDC-level adjudication, step edits, and formulary messaging that must align with what dispensing channels can do in practice.

Interchangeability is a workflow upgrade. The savings only materialize when the switch happens at the counter, in the claim, and in the bin.

Insulin showed the pattern, and the numbers were not subtle

The best real-world clue that interchangeability is more than a label comes from insulin. Managed Healthcare Executive reported in July 2021 that the FDA approved Semglee (insulin glargine-yfgn) as both biosimilar to and interchangeable with Sanofi’s Lantus, and that pharmacists could substitute it subject to state rules. The same piece noted the FDA had approved 29 biosimilars at the time, and Semglee was the first interchangeable biosimilar insulin product.

Podiatry Today, citing an economic evaluation by Murphy and Holtkamp in JAMA Health Forum (published May 2, 2025), described what happened next. Using IQVIA National Prescription Audit and PayerTrak data from September 2019 through June 2024, the researchers applied interrupted time-series methods and found a step-change increase in biosimilar dispensing immediately after the FDA granted interchangeability in November 2021. In Podiatry Today’s summary, Semglee and insulin glargine-yfgn together increased by more than 47,000 prescriptions right after that designation.

Two implementation details in that analysis matter to operators. First, Podiatry Today reports the increase occurred across retail, mail order, and long-term care pharmacy channels, suggesting interchangeability can carry across multiple dispensing workflows instead of being confined to one setting. Second, in payer-specific results, the study reported especially strong uptake of insulin glargine-yfgn among Medicare Part D, Medicaid, and cash-paying patients, which suggests the designation is most visible where out-of-pocket sensitivity is highest.

Wezlana and golimumab raise the stakes for specialty and clinic-adjacent spend

Ustekinumab and golimumab are different operational animals than insulin glargine. They touch specialty distribution, cold-chain handling, and, depending on care setting, clinic workflows and patient support programs. Still, the FDA’s stance on interchangeability is consistent: Healthcare Purchasing News reported that the agency’s approval of Wezlana was based on a comprehensive review intended to show high similarity to Stelara and no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, and potency, along with evidence to meet the additional legal requirements for interchangeability.

The AJN/Journal of Healthcare Management Drug Watch item on Ovid is short, but the timing is the news. A September 2026 report of an interchangeable biosimilar to golimumab suggests interchangeability is extending further into immunology categories where utilization management has traditionally leaned on prescribers, specialty pharmacies, and infusion site-of-care controls.

For procurement and pharmacy buyers, that broadening matters in a practical way: the first quarter after a switch is when bins, labels, and order sets get messy. Interchangeability can reduce prescriber touchpoints, but it increases the importance of clean product master data, barcoding practices, and contract language that makes the “preferred” product operationally preferred, not just financially preferred.

The fastest way to lose biosimilar savings is to let substitution become a one-pharmacy experiment instead of a systemwide rule.

Where pharmacy directors and payer ops teams should pressure-test their setup now

  • Map state substitution requirements to your actual dispensing footprint. Interchangeability is federal, substitution rules are state-by-state, and both Healthcare Purchasing News and Managed Healthcare Executive emphasize that variability. Multi-state systems need a rule table, not a memo.
  • Audit your NDC and product mapping for interchangeable pairs before you add a new preferred agent. The insulin evidence base described by Podiatry Today suggests utilization can jump quickly after designation. If claims edits or dispensing catalogs lag, the first month will be noisy.
  • Decide how prescriber intent will be captured and honored. If “dispense as written” logic is inconsistently represented across eRx, EHR, and pharmacy systems, substitution will become exception handling.
  • Put inventory and cold-chain handling in the same meeting as formulary and contracting. Ustekinumab-class products can stress storage and replenishment patterns in a way insulin did not, and operational readiness is what makes a switch stick.

Featured companies

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale NewsroomEditorial Team, MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Healthcare Insights

More nurses did not lift safety culture scores in a 205-hospital analysis

More nurses did not lift safety culture scores in a 205-hospital analysis

A 2026 analysis in the Journal of Hospital Management and Health Policy combined 2021–2022 HSOPC results with AHA, HCRIS, and AHRF data across 205 hospitals and reported that small increases in nurse and physician staffing lined up with slightly lower “percent positive” patient safety culture scores in several dimensions. According to the Journal of Healthcare Management abstract hosted on Ovid, the study described a 2% decrease in positive staffing perceptions with β=−0.02 per additional nurse FTE and a −0.01 change in perceived reporting of patient safety events per additional nurse, while additional physician staffing was associated with −0.01 changes in perceptions of communication openness and organizational learning, and joint ventures were associated with a −0.03 change in perceptions of management support for safety (all p<0.05). The operational read is that adding headcount by itself does not ensure stronger safety-culture signals; hospitals also need the workflows that turn observations into closed-loop fixes, from “just culture” reporting expectations to facilities work-order follow-through, as described by Sentara Health leaders in Chief Healthcare Executive and by Health Facilities Management’s environment-of-care guidance. For health system operators, the near-term consequence shows up in how HSOPC survey targets connect to leader scorecards, rounding programs, digital reporting tools, and joint-venture governance, especially where staffing growth is driven by complexity and handoffs.

  • 01If HSOPC “percent positive” scores are a board KPI, staffing increases can move in the opposite direction unless reporting and learning loops scale too. The study’s negative coefficients are small, but they signal a measurement risk during growth.
  • 02Facilities and clinical safety cultures converge in the same pipeline: observation, reporting, triage, work order, verification. HFM Magazine’s door-lock example is the same system problem as event reporting, it is throughput and closure, not awareness.
  • 03Joint ventures can add operational complexity that dilutes perceived management support for safety. That belongs in JV governance charters and integration playbooks, not only in finance models.

Sep 1, 2026

Smart ICU and ambient AI cut errors when they feed data and notes into the EMR

Smart ICU and ambient AI cut errors when they feed data and notes into the EMR

Two HIMSS26 APAC case studies point to the same operational lesson: hospitals are getting measurable gains from “smart ICU” device integration and ambient AI documentation only when those tools are tightly integrated into core clinical workflows. Pondok Indah Hospital Group in Indonesia reported reductions of up to 70% in ICU administrative errors and 40% in adverse drug reactions after integrating smart devices, according to Healthcare IT News. Sir H.N. Reliance Foundation Hospital in India reported ambient AI is now used for nearly 90% of progress notes and shift handovers across five live use cases on a single EMR-integrated platform, also reported by Healthcare IT News. New JAMA Network cardiovascular research adds a parallel signal on the clinical side, with AI-enabled acquisition and interpretation approaches moving into screening and triage workflows, which raises procurement questions about validation, interoperability, and change management at the bedside.

  • 01A useful benchmark is emerging for documentation automation: “nearly 90% of progress notes and shift handovers” on ambient AI when it is deployed as one EMR-integrated platform, not a set of point tools (Healthcare IT News).
  • 02The measurable ROI in ‘smart ICU’ programs shows up where operators feel pain: fewer administrative errors and medication-related events, not in abstract “digitization” metrics (Healthcare IT News reported up to 70% and 40% reductions, respectively).
  • 03For hospitals with multiple device vendors and fragmented documentation workflows, integration work, interfaces, identity, order context, and governance, is likely to consume more effort than model selection, so contracts and implementation plans should price integration explicitly.

Sep 1, 2026

Gartner says AI budgets are growing faster than the rules to control them

Gartner says AI budgets are growing faster than the rules to control them

Gartner’s late-August 2026 research points to a familiar operational pattern in enterprise AI: budgets are rising faster than the controls meant to keep costs and risk predictable. In a Aug. 26 press release, Gartner said AI spending by customer service leaders surged 38% even as overall service and support budgets rose 2%. Earlier, at Gartner’s March 2026 Data & Analytics Summit, Gartner analysts said only 44% of organizations had adopted financial guardrails or AI FinOps practices, a gap that becomes more painful as AI workloads scale. The practical takeaway for CIOs, customer service operations leaders, and data and analytics teams is to treat AI governance, cost attribution, and human escalation paths as procurement requirements, not after-the-fact fixes.

  • 01A useful benchmark for planning: Gartner pegs AI spend growth in customer service at 38% versus 2% budget growth overall, a mismatch that forces reallocation and harder ROI proof.
  • 02Only 44% of organizations have adopted AI FinOps-style guardrails, according to Gartner. If AI is moving into production, chargeback and consumption limits need to be designed into the rollout.
  • 03Gartner also forecasts spending on securing AI will hit $4.8 billion in 2027, signaling that AI security is becoming a standalone budget line rather than a feature bundled into existing platforms.

Sep 1, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

About the Expert

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale Newsroom

Editorial Team

MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512