Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Interchangeable biosimilars cut drug spend only when pharmacies can actually switch them

The FDA’s interchangeable biosimilar pathway is moving from a one-off insulin milestone to a repeatable playbook for pharmacy-level substitution, with Wezlana (ustekinumab-auub) approved as interchangeable to Stelara in late 2023 and a first interchangeable biosimilar to golimumab reported in September 2026. Evidence from a JAMA Health Forum economic evaluation cited by Podiatry Today found that insulin glargine interchangeability in November 2021 was followed by an immediate jump of more than 47,000 prescriptions for Semglee and insulin glargine-yfgn, suggesting the designation itself can change dispensing behavior. For hospitals, health systems, and payers, the operational consequence shows up less in the FDA letter and more in formulary design, NDC-level claims logic, pharmacy notification requirements that vary by state, and the inventory and education workflows that make substitution predictable instead of chaotic.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By MarketScale Newsroom · FdaBiosimilarsInterchangeable BiosimilarPharmacy Operations
Share
Interchangeable biosimilars cut drug spend only when pharmacies can actually switch them

Key takeaways

01

Interchangeability is a workflow change, not a clinical debate. The systems that decide spend are NDC mapping, e-prescribe defaults, and pharmacy switch rules governed by state law.

02

The pipeline is widening beyond diabetes. Wezlana’s interchangeability to Stelara (Healthcare Purchasing News) and a newly reported interchangeable golimumab biosimilar (American Journal of Nursing (AJN), accessed via Ovid) signal more specialty and infusion-adjacent categories will face pharmacy-level substitution decisions.

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Interchangeability has stopped being a novelty. It’s becoming a lever that pharmacy and payer ops teams can actually pull, but only if their switching, claims, and inventory systems are built to handle it.

The latest signal is category breadth. In October 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Amgen’s Wezlana (ustekinumab-auub) as a biosimilar to and interchangeable with Janssen’s Stelara (ustekinumab) across multiple inflammatory indications, including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, according to Healthcare Purchasing News. In September 2026, a Drug Watch item in the American Journal of Nursing (AJN), accessed via Ovid, reported the FDA approved golimumab-sldi as the first interchangeable biosimilar to golimumab for severely active rheumatoid arthritis (in combination with methotrexate) and moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.

The operational point: interchangeability changes who has to decide, and when

A standard biosimilar decision often lands with P&T committees, specialty pharmacy, prior authorization, and prescriber education. Interchangeability shifts some of that decision-making downstream to dispensing, because the FDA designation enables pharmacy-level substitution without contacting the prescriber, although state pharmacy laws still control the exact mechanics, as both Healthcare Purchasing News and Managed Healthcare Executive note in their coverage of FDA explanations.

That difference sounds legalistic until it hits the shop floor. For hospital pharmacies and health-system outpatient pharmacies, it affects how substitution logic is configured in dispensing software, how e-prescribing messages are interpreted, and how staff handle patient notification and prescriber “dispense as written” signals where state rules require them. For payers and PBMs, it shows up as NDC-level adjudication, step edits, and formulary messaging that must align with what dispensing channels can do in practice.

Interchangeability is a workflow upgrade. The savings only materialize when the switch happens at the counter, in the claim, and in the bin.

Insulin showed the pattern, and the numbers were not subtle

The best real-world clue that interchangeability is more than a label comes from insulin. Managed Healthcare Executive reported in July 2021 that the FDA approved Semglee (insulin glargine-yfgn) as both biosimilar to and interchangeable with Sanofi’s Lantus, and that pharmacists could substitute it subject to state rules. The same piece noted the FDA had approved 29 biosimilars at the time, and Semglee was the first interchangeable biosimilar insulin product.

Podiatry Today, citing an economic evaluation by Murphy and Holtkamp in JAMA Health Forum (published May 2, 2025), described what happened next. Using IQVIA National Prescription Audit and PayerTrak data from September 2019 through June 2024, the researchers applied interrupted time-series methods and found a step-change increase in biosimilar dispensing immediately after the FDA granted interchangeability in November 2021. In Podiatry Today’s summary, Semglee and insulin glargine-yfgn together increased by more than 47,000 prescriptions right after that designation.

Two implementation details in that analysis matter to operators. First, Podiatry Today reports the increase occurred across retail, mail order, and long-term care pharmacy channels, suggesting interchangeability can carry across multiple dispensing workflows instead of being confined to one setting. Second, in payer-specific results, the study reported especially strong uptake of insulin glargine-yfgn among Medicare Part D, Medicaid, and cash-paying patients, which suggests the designation is most visible where out-of-pocket sensitivity is highest.

Wezlana and golimumab raise the stakes for specialty and clinic-adjacent spend

Ustekinumab and golimumab are different operational animals than insulin glargine. They touch specialty distribution, cold-chain handling, and, depending on care setting, clinic workflows and patient support programs. Still, the FDA’s stance on interchangeability is consistent: Healthcare Purchasing News reported that the agency’s approval of Wezlana was based on a comprehensive review intended to show high similarity to Stelara and no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, and potency, along with evidence to meet the additional legal requirements for interchangeability.

The AJN Drug Watch item accessed via Ovid is short, but the timing is the news. A September 2026 report of an interchangeable biosimilar to golimumab suggests interchangeability is extending further into immunology categories where utilization management has traditionally leaned on prescribers, specialty pharmacies, and infusion site-of-care controls.

For procurement and pharmacy buyers, that broadening matters in a practical way: the first quarter after a switch is when bins, labels, and order sets get messy. Interchangeability can reduce prescriber touchpoints, but it increases the importance of clean product master data, barcoding practices, and contract language that makes the “preferred” product operationally preferred, not just financially preferred.

The fastest way to lose biosimilar savings is to let substitution become a one-pharmacy experiment instead of a systemwide rule.

Where pharmacy directors and payer ops teams should pressure-test their setup now

  • Map state substitution requirements to your actual dispensing footprint. Interchangeability is federal, substitution rules are state-by-state, and both Healthcare Purchasing News and Managed Healthcare Executive emphasize that variability. Multi-state systems need a rule table, not a memo.
  • Audit your NDC and product mapping for interchangeable pairs before you add a new preferred agent. The insulin evidence base described by Podiatry Today suggests utilization can jump quickly after designation. If claims edits or dispensing catalogs lag, the first month will be noisy.
  • Decide how prescriber intent will be captured and honored. If “dispense as written” logic is inconsistently represented across eRx, EHR, and pharmacy systems, substitution will become exception handling.
  • Put inventory and cold-chain handling in the same meeting as formulary and contracting. Ustekinumab-class products can stress storage and replenishment patterns in a way insulin did not, and operational readiness is what makes a switch stick.

Featured companies

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale NewsroomEditorial Team, MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Healthcare Insights

The EU’s MDR delay buys time, but it won’t clear your commissioning bottleneck

The European Commission backed extending EU MDR transition deadlines to December 2027 and December 2028, Medical Design & Outsourcing reported. It buys time, not ramp-up capacity. Design News cites digital commissioning and machine digital twins to cut “power-on” surprises and speed validation and operator training.

  • 01If an EU portfolio includes Class III, December 2027 is now the planning anchor, but the internal gating item may shift to validation capacity and automation readiness, not paperwork.
  • 02Digital commissioning is becoming a procurement spec, not a buzzword, because it lets teams run DFM/DFA learning loops before hardware is built, which Design News notes is meant to reduce machine power-on surprises.

Sep 5, 2026

HCA’s Q1 was not about volume. It was about coverage and collecting cash

HCA Healthcare reaffirmed 2026 guidance after Q1 weather and a muted respiratory season cut adjusted EBITDA by about $180 million, according to HealthLeaders and Fierce Healthcare. Payer mix shifted fast. Exchange admissions fell about 15% and uninsured admissions rose about 16%, Fierce reported.

  • 01A mild flu season can be a margin event: HCA tied a 42% drop in respiratory admissions to a roughly $180M adjusted EBITDA hit (HealthLeaders, Fierce Healthcare).
  • 02The 2026 risk is sliding from demand to coverage: HCA cited a $600M–$900M full-year EBITDA headwind from exchange-related changes, with $150M already in Q1 (HealthLeaders, Fierce Healthcare).
  • 03Supplemental payments are becoming an operating capability, not a windfall: HCA said Q1 Medicaid program net benefit was about $200M vs $80M expected (HealthLeaders, Fierce Healthcare), putting state-by-state reimbursement strategy on the CFO’s critical path.

Sep 5, 2026

Dental practice exits are turning into multi-year projects, not last-year decisions

Dental practice exits are turning into multi-year projects, not last-year decisions

Associate-led dental practice successions can take 3–5+ years. Dental Economics says associate-to-buyout timelines often run three to five-plus years. That pushes revenue-cycle controls, buy-sell terms, and tax structure earlier, before a buyer appears.

  • 01A practical benchmark is emerging for succession: bringing in an associate with intent to buy can take a minimum of three years and often more than five, according to Dental Economics.
  • 02If accounts receivable looks “high,” it may be a bookkeeping and posting problem before it is a payer problem, a revenue-cycle diagnostic Group Dentistry Now says shows up frequently at scale.
  • 03Exit planning is now an operating system project: valuation, tax positioning, and transition support belong in the same workstream, because deal structure can lock in or foreclose tax options, per Dental Economics.

Sep 4, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

About the Expert

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale Newsroom

Editorial Team

MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512