Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Consolidation In The Healthcare Marketplace Is Driving Up Costs

In today’s healthcare climate it’s becoming more challenging for hospitals to remain financially viable. This is especially true for stand-alone, independent hospitals. According to Moody’s researchers, median operating cash-flow margins of 160 surveyed hospital systems dropped from 9.5% in 2016 to 8.1% in 2017.[1] What’s causing the decrease in profitability? Higher labor and supply costs,…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

In today’s healthcare climate it’s becoming more challenging for hospitals to remain financially viable. This is especially true for stand-alone, independent hospitals. According to Moody’s researchers, median operating cash-flow margins of 160 surveyed hospital systems dropped from 9.5% in 2016 to 8.1% in 2017.[1] What’s causing the decrease in profitability? Higher labor and supply costs, higher drug costs, and lower reimbursement from commercial and government payers. If you’re a small hospital with a tight budget, then you’ve probably entertained the idea of consolidating with a larger system with hopes of controlling costs and growing margins. But the data suggests that both financially and in terms of patient care, consolidation might not be the ideal solution.

The Effects of Consolidation

Across the country, large corporate organizations are snapping up smaller healthcare independents. Today, two in three U.S. hospitals are part of a multi-hospital system. In addition, 1,035 of the 4,840 community hospitals in the U.S. are owned by private investors – that’s 21.4%, up from 16% ten years ago.[2] Unfortunately, hospital consolidation usually does not create the financial efficiencies independent hospitals hope to gain when they agree to an acquisition.

Acquired hospitals should manage their expectations as evidence shows they can realize just a 1.5% gain in marginal efficiency following a merger.[3] Studies also reveal that the average price of hospital services increases 6%−18% as a consequence of these mergers.[4] Consolidation typically results in a rise of prices through facility fees and other fixed costs. Not only is consolidation bad for prices, it can also negatively impact patient care. When hospitals consolidate they concede their independence and are no longer free to make decisions they feel are best for their community, and instead must defer community decisions to a larger corporate entity. 

Collaboration – an Alternative to Consolidation

By many measures, regional coalitions, like TPC, can be a superior alternative to consolidation. Uniting together in healthcare collaboration allows hospitals to aggregate volume without having to merge assets or concede their independence. A majority of the value is achieved through a shared purpose and willingness to act as a system. As a result, hospitals enjoy greater purchasing power and improved supply chain efficiency all while keeping care local and affordable. As supply costs can account for 25-30% of a hospital’s operating budget, with costly Physician Preference Items (PPI) accounting for up to 60% of supply spend, a collaborative effort can drive enhanced value and improved performance, even in complex categories. As a result, collaborative partner hospitals can realize a 20% decrease in supply costs.[5]

The TPC Model

TPC is a partnership that allows independent community hospitals to aggregate their volume to contain costs and leverage their collective strength and size as if they were a single entity. By collaborating, TPC Member hospitals have driven to improve their individual and combined financial, operational and clinical performance. They work together in supply chain, purchased services and revenue cycle to achieve more together than they could alone. In addition, TPC clinical and administrative leaders become part of a virtual network in which they can share best practices and drive better decision making in order to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction. By aligning with like-sized, like-minded facilities, Members benefit from economies of scale, pooled resources and collective expertise.

Stronger Together. Superior Results. Visit us online to learn more about TPC today!

[1] http://www.paulkeckley.com/the-keckley-report/2018/9/11/does-a-hospitals-ownership-matter

[2] http://www.paulkeckley.com/the-keckley-report/2018/9/11/does-a-hospitals-ownership-matter

[3] https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/strategy/how-much-can-ma-cut-costs-lower-your-expectations

[4]https://www.ncci.com/Articles/Pages/II_Insights_QEB_Impact-of-Hospital-Consolidation-on-Medical-Costs.aspx

[5]https://static1.squarespace.com/static/52cd8717e4b02c4c62599d9a/t/58d521a1be659456292aada2/1507043003253/TPC_Supply+Chain+World_Spring+2017.pdf

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

QinFlow's new pressure bag device skips scheduled calibration and preventive maintenance

QinFlow's new pressure bag device skips scheduled calibration and preventive maintenance

QinFlow's PressSure is a battery-powered device that holds standard pressure bags at one of three fixed preset pressures during blood or IV fluid infusions.

  • 01So far it’s manufacturer design claims; what matters next is in-service reports from early hospital or EMS adopters.

Oct 1, 2026

BedConnect’s Lindsey Joseph on matching post-acute care to patient needs

BedConnect’s Lindsey Joseph on matching post-acute care to patient needs

On I Don’t Care, BedConnect founder Lindsey Joseph and Kevin Stevenson discuss the limits of broad post-acute referrals. Their proposal is to match clinical needs, payer coverage and available beds before presenting options. CMS guidance and AHRQ discharge resources provide independent context; they do not establish BedConnect’s clinical outcomes.

  • 01BedConnect proposes matching clinical needs, payer coverage and bed availability before presenting post-acute options; this is the company’s approach, not independently validated outcome evidence.
  • 02CMS discharge-planning guidance emphasizes patient goals, treatment preferences and relevant provider quality and resource-use data.
  • 03Readmission comparisons need a defined patient group, time window and source; the interview’s roughly one-quarter/fourteen-day estimate has not been independently verified.

Sep 29, 2026

Rock Health: $7.4B went into digital health in H1 2026, and 20 rounds took 45%

Rock Health: $7.4B went into digital health in H1 2026, and 20 rounds took 45%

Rock Health: U.S. digital health startups raised $7.4 billion across 244 deals in H1 2026, up from $6.4 billion on 245 deals in H1 2025. The rebound is concentrated. Nineteen companies raised 20 $100 million-plus rounds that captured 45% of capital.

  • 01In H1 2026, 19 companies raised 20 mega-deals of $100 million or more, representing 45% of all capital invested, according to Rock Health.
  • 02According to Rock Health, the firm stopped labeling startups as “AI-enabled,” saying the technology is now too widespread for the label to be meaningful.

Sep 24, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512