Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEngineering & Construction

Top 4 Reasons Mechanical Seals Fail

The common causes of mechanical seals failuring in aerospace applications are discussed, shedding light on the potential risks and implications for programs and systems. Understanding these causes is crucial to prevent costly setbacks and ensure reliable performance. Jason Riggs, Director of Strategy at Technetics, highlights four key reasons for mechanical seals failing. First, the use…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Engineering & Construction teams put it to work with Partner & Channel Enablement.

Promoted content from Technetics Group on MarketScale.

Share

The common causes of mechanical seals failuring in aerospace applications are discussed, shedding light on the potential risks and implications for programs and systems. Understanding these causes is crucial to prevent costly setbacks and ensure reliable performance.

Jason Riggs, Director of Strategy at Technetics, highlights four key reasons for mechanical seals failing. First, the use of analysis techniques that generate designs that do not align with the supplier’s capabilities can lead to unexpected issues during operation. It emphasizes the importance of considering supplier capabilities and expertise when designing seals.

Second, ineffective seal designs that fail to address the specific sealing problem at hand are a significant concern. Lack of experience and pedigree in seal design can contribute to suboptimal solutions that do not meet the desired performance requirements.

The third cause of concern is not designing for environments that can lead to latent failures. Neglecting to account for the operating conditions and environmental factors that can impact seal performance can result in unforeseen failures and compromised system integrity.

Lastly, manufacturing processes or inadequate process control can hinder the production of seals that align with the analytical model. Inconsistencies between the intended design and the actual manufactured seal can introduce vulnerabilities and increase the risk of failure.

In aerospace applications, seal failures can have serious consequences. They can jeopardize qualification efforts, leading to scheduling delays and increased costs. Additionally, latent field failures can emerge, resulting in unexpected expenses and compromised system functionality. Premature seal failure can reduce the overall system life, impacting efficiency and reliability. The most concerning outcome is the potential for catastrophic failure at the component or system level, posing significant risks to safety and performance.

By understanding and addressing these causes of seal failures, aerospace programs and systems can mitigate risks and enhance their reliability. Effective process control during manufacturing is crucial to ensure that the final seals align with the intended design and analytical models.

Video TranscriptExpand ↓

Mechanical seals can fail for a variety of reasons, including analysis techniques that generate designs that don't match the supplier's capabilities. Number two, seal designs that are ineffective in solving the given sealing problem. Usually due to a lack of experience in pedigree, Number three, not designing for environments that can lead to latent failures. And number four, manufacturing processes or process control roles incapable of producing a seal that mirrors the analytical model. In an aerospace application, these seal's failures can be significant and can result in failed qualification efforts, which can put a program in significant scheduling cost risk. Number two, latent field failures that can lead to cost and failure deletations. Number three, reduce system life due to premature seal failure. And most concerning, number four, potential catastrophic failure at the component or system level.

Technetics Group

Part of this channel

Technetics Group

Engineered seals and components for semiconductor, aerospace, and nuclear.

Visit the channel →

Engineering & Construction: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Engineering & Construction buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Engineering & Construction Insights

AI moves from back office to job site in construction's next build-out

AI moves from back office to job site in construction's next build-out

McCarthy Building Companies has entered a multimillion-dollar agreement with Palantir to enhance AI adoption. However, RICS experts highlight that data readiness and organizational culture pose significant challenges. This development signals a shift in integrating AI within construction sectors.

  • 01McCarthy Building Cos. signs a major deal with Palantir.
  • 02Data readiness is a critical hurdle for AI integration.
  • 03Organizational culture impacts AI adoption in construction.

Jul 11, 2026

South Korea commits $7.5 billion to AI-autonomous manufacturing as smart factory count hits 30,000

South Korea commits $7.5 billion to AI-autonomous manufacturing as smart factory count hits 30,000

South Korea is investing $7.5 billion in advancing AI-autonomous manufacturing, with a significant increase in smart factories, now totaling 30,000. The initiative also targets the development of 100 AI manufacturing zones throughout the country.

  • 01South Korea invests $7.5 billion in AI-autonomous manufacturing.
  • 02There are currently 30,000 smart factories in South Korea.
  • 03The government aims to develop 100 AI manufacturing zones.

Jul 11, 2026

Construction's productivity crisis: why ML cost forecasting and off-site methods are converging

Construction's productivity crisis: why ML cost forecasting and off-site methods are converging

U.S. construction productivity has decreased since 1968. Machine learning models and off-site construction methods are becoming pivotal in bridging this productivity gap by providing accurate cost forecasting and efficient building practices.

  • 01U.S. construction productivity has been declining since 1968.
  • 02Machine learning models offer enhanced cost forecasting capabilities.
  • 03Off-site construction methods contribute to improved project efficiency.

Jul 10, 2026

Explore More Engineering & Construction Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Engineering & Construction.

Browse Engineering & Construction Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Engineering & Construction and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512