Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEngineering & Construction

A Good Design is a Problem Solved with Dony Dawson of Clarus

A designer is tasked with one of the hardest professional balances in the game: function vs. fashion. Can they create something that’s not only aesthetically pleasing, but serves its purpose? Dony Dawson, Vice President of Design for Clarus, said that often, designers miss the point of their project. “I’ve seen it throughout my career…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Engineering & Construction teams put it to work with Partner & Channel Enablement.

Share

Free workspace

Turn your Engineering & Construction expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI in a free MarketScale workspace. Qualifying companies also get one professional video edit a month. No credit card.

Start free

A designer is tasked with one of the hardest professional balances in the game: function vs. fashion. Can they create something that’s not only aesthetically pleasing, but serves its purpose? Dony Dawson, Vice President of Design for Clarus, said that often, designers miss the point of their project.

“I’ve seen it throughout my career many times, people who claimed to be designers and they like to sit down in a room and just come up with really dreamy ideas and then they throw it into the wind and see if anybody grabs it,” Dawson said. What he’s found sets a designer apart is aiming to solve a client’s problem, asking questions, and getting to the meat of the design. “Many people seem to forget that we’re in the business of solving people’s problems and making their lives easier.”

Dawson joined us on Glass is in Session to dig into his methodology for delivering a design that not only looks the part, but delivers functionally, tips for how designers can break out of the creative rut, and some examples of when Clarus has taken what a client wants and turned it into what a client needs.

HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE EPISODE

Daniel Litwin: So let’s turn to the actual client relationship. I think that is an important part of insuring that the design comes off not only beautifully but effectively and I think this is something you hear a lot in service obviously, which is the customer is always right. But I think to a degree, the customer, the client always being right isn’t necessarily true and taking their input is important, but sometimes being able to take their input and say, “Hey, I acknowledge what you’re trying to do here, but you will get a better product if blank or if we go in blank direction.” Tell me a bit about that delicate balance of listening but also taking the initiative to give some of that tough feedback when things maybe what the client imagines is the best product isn’t really the best product.

Dony Dawson: Well, I’m really glad you brought that up because that is an absolutely wonderful thing that we love to work with. When we work with our end clients, whether that’d be an end user, a designer, a dealer, whoever it is what we’re working with, we get so excited, we bring them in-house, we bring them into our R&D facility, and this becomes some of the very best conversations that we have. And what happens is as we start to go through the discovery process, start talking about the issues, the problems, some of the things that they’ve tried in the past that may or may not have worked, we start to then find that the conversation doesn’t become a beat down for anybody, it becomes exciting. They become part of that discovery process and we love partnering with designers and end users.

And as the two of us or the three of us or how many people we have in the room start to put our heads together and we start go through this process, it becomes very synergistic and it empowers them and starts to help them to think a little bit differently and it’s amazing what comes out of those meetings and it’s very empowering for them to understand how we do things, and then when they see it and when they get involved with it and they start to see the techniques that we have from making things, we come up with something as a whole that none of us could have come up with as a single individual.

DL: And do you ever feel pushed back on some of these ideas or do you have any tips and tricks for when the client isn’t quite as receptive to that idea how you balance keeping integrity for the project that Clarus is putting their name on but at the same time, you know, you don’t want to upset the client, either you want them to have the best product possible?

DD: Absolutely. And so for those who haven’t had an opportunity to come to Clarus and to see our wonderful facility and the laboratory that we have, we have worked very hard to take the prototyping process and bring it all in-house. And so what used to take six to eight weeks for a prototype of a certain piece to come back to us, we can now do that in two to three hours.

And to answer your question, we like to go ahead and produce or even create three-dimensional photo realistic renderings of what maybe a client has asked. But because of the speed at which we can do this, we can then present two or three other options that piggybank off what they’ve designed and say, “Hey, we know the design that you gave us is great and we got some really good ideas from that that spurned on these other ideas.”

And once you take a look at that and evaluate it, and again, we’re trying to empower those individuals so that they can see the creative process, feel like they’re part of it, and really take ownership of the design process along with those and then it becomes exciting, synergistic. We build their trust. And once we have their trust now, then they let us loosen the reins and go forward with things that they had never even dreamt possible.

For the latest news, videos, and podcasts in the AEC Industry, be sure to subscribe to our industry publication.

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @AECMKSL

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Engineering & Construction starts with a company putting its project engineers, superintendents, and estimators on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Owners shortlist firms they already trust, and your field leaders become the reason your name is on that list.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Engineering & Construction, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Engineering & Construction: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Engineering & Construction buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Engineering & Construction expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your project engineers, superintendents, and estimators into the articles, video, and social content Engineering & Construction buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0. No credit card. Company confirmation required.

More Engineering & Construction Insights

Packaging robots can beat labor long term on cost, PMMI argues

Packaging robots can beat labor long term on cost, PMMI argues

PMMI's Tom Egan wrote in Processing Magazine that adding packaging automation and robotics can now be justified as more cost-effective over the long term than the high cost of labor in food, beverage and CPG plants. Separately, Packaging World describes AI-enabled AMRs from ABB and Agilox that automate material movement between packaging stations. The remaining gap is adoption among smaller manufacturers.

  • 01Two reference points for infrastructure-light material movement: ABB's Flexley Mover P603 carries 1,500 kg with sub-centimeter positioning and no floor markers, and Agilox's OFL lifts 800 kg pallets on peer-to-peer fleet software with no central traffic controller, per Packaging World.
  • 02The open ground is small and mid-sized manufacturers: MTC's Mike Wilson counts tens of thousands of UK SMEs with no robotic automation at all and expects cobots to take most of that growth.
  • 03A robotics business case should include procurement, not only line labor: a June 2026 China Journal of Accounting Research study found heavy robot adopters spread buying across more suppliers, gaining resilience but losing inventory efficiency and adding transaction costs.

Sep 18, 2026

Xtellio brings telematics to jobsite tools and heaters

Xtellio brings telematics to jobsite tools and heaters

Xtellio launched a two-tier telematics platform in March 2026: 32 battery-powered Xense sensors for small tools and wired Pro-Xentral devices for excavators, light towers and heaters. The company claims a 10-year battery life. Data is delivered through open APIs, which Xtellio frames as customer ownership of the data, aimed at rental and construction fleets where small assets have gone largely untracked.

  • 01Xtellio’s stated 10-year battery life for its Bluetooth Xense sensors is the key spec to test in the field; if it holds up, tagging hundreds of tools can look like a one-time install rather than a recurring battery-maintenance program.
  • 02For rental houses and contractors running mixed fleets, the sharper question is no longer which machines have telematics but whether the heaters, light towers and hand tools do, and whether that data lands in the same system.
  • 03Open APIs and “data liberation” are part of Xtellio’s pitch, and the coverage frames that as a prompt for RFP questions: what the APIs expose, where data can be sent, and whether customers can take historical data if they switch providers.

Sep 18, 2026

Senate bill would double smart water grants to $50 million a year

Senate bill would double smart water grants to $50 million a year

S. 2388, the Water Infrastructure Modernization Act of 2025, would double an EPA water tech pilot to $50 million a year through 2028. Grants would cover design, construction, training and operations for leak detection, advanced metering and AI analytics, WaterWorld reported. Planning and maintenance stay on the utility's tab.

  • 01Under S. 2388 as WaterWorld describes it, feasibility studies are not grant-eligible, so a utility would have to pay to build the case for a smart water project before applying for help building the project itself.
  • 02The bill's eligible list puts advanced digital design and construction management tools in the same bucket as meters and sensors, which would give a utility's capital delivery team a claim on the same grant as its field operations group.
  • 03The existing pilot program's authorization runs through 2026, per WaterWorld; the bill would extend it to 2028, and its last reported status was 'introduced' as of Aug. 12, 2025.

Sep 17, 2026

Explore More Engineering & Construction Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Engineering & Construction.

Browse Engineering & Construction Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Engineering & Construction and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512