Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEnergy

Why Both Permissionless and Permissioned Blockchains Will Support the Logistics Industry

The logistics industry stands to benefit from both permissionless and permissioned blockchain infrastructures, as each serves distinct operational needs. Permissionless blockchains enable open, trustless transparency across supply chain participants, while permissioned blockchains offer controlled access suited to enterprise compliance and privacy requirements. Together, they form a complementary foundation for end-to-end supply chain visibility and efficiency.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Energy teams put it to work with Customer Stories & Case Studies.

Promoted content from Experts Talk on MarketScale.

By Transportation · Experts TalkInteraxisLogisticsPermissioned Blockchains
Share

Key takeaways

01

Permissionless blockchains provide open, decentralized transparency for supply chain ecosystems.

02

Permissioned blockchains offer controlled access and privacy features needed by enterprise logistics operators.

03

A hybrid approach using both blockchain types is likely necessary to fully modernize logistics infrastructure.

Get featured

Want MarketScale to feature Energy?

Book a 15-minute demo and we'll map your Energy expertise to the content buyers are searching for.

Book a demo

The logistics industry is at a crossroads, exploring the best ways to implement real-world asset (RWA) tokenization. This transformative approach promises to enhance visibility and achieve supply chain goals. As the sector grapples with the decision between permissionless and permissioned blockchains, the stakes are high: the right choice could revolutionize efficiency and security across global supply chains.

The right choice could revolutionize efficiency and security across global supply chains.

Which blockchain infrastructure—permissionless and permissioned blockchains—is best suited for the logistics industry's adoption of real-world asset tokenization?

Adam Blumberg, Co-Founder of Interaxis, provides insights into this critical decision on this clip from a full episode of MarketScale's premiere debate and discussion roundtable, Experts Talk. Drawing from his experience and observations, particularly in industries like oil and gas and organic food production, Blumberg evaluates the advantages and drawbacks of both permissionless and permissions blockchains in the context of logistics.

Main Takeaways:

  • Industry-Specific Blockchains: Certain sectors, like oil and gas, have started adopting permissioned blockchains to address specific supply chain issues, providing a sense of security by keeping transactions relatively private.
  • Adoption Challenges: While permissioned blockchains offer a controlled environment, they pose challenges in terms of integration with the broader decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem, potentially limiting efficiency gains.
  • Technological Advancements: As blockchain technology advances, the logistics industry might overcome initial reservations, gradually moving towards more open, permissionless systems to leverage global efficiencies.
  • Case Examples: Companies like Topple are demonstrating the benefits of permissioned chains in organic food production, allowing controlled visibility that eases concerns over data privacy while showcasing the technology's potential.
  • Strategic Balancing: The logistics industry may initially adopt a hybrid approach, starting with permissioned blockchains to build trust and familiarity, before potentially transitioning to permissionless models to fully exploit the advantages of decentralized finance and global interoperability.

By weighing these perspectives, industry leaders can make informed decisions on blockchain infrastructure, paving the way for a more efficient and secure future in logistics.

Video TranscriptExpand ↓

I'm a big fan of the permissionless, blockchain side, but I totally understand that certain industries might wanna build kind of their own permission. I know Lee you know, I'm I'm from Texas. Lee and I known each other a while when you were first starting the council. Some of those companies in Texas that have start started, like, oil and gas specific blockchain related companies specifically for kinda supply chain issues. And it's put some of those companies, I think, more at ease with the fact that this is not, you know, this is not a bunch of, you know, ETH validators wherever they might be in the world looking at my transactions. This is still, relatively private. So I understand in the supply chain world where it might be advantageous to have kind of an industry permissioned chain, kind of like what Maersk was trying to do. But now that we have more adoption, now that we have better technology, maybe we get there. My frustration with that is how is it going to interact with the decentralized finance ecosystem, which is really when you can see some efficiencies. It's really where you you can see some people leverage, what what is built being built overall with global permission permissionless blockchains. But I can see where, again, the dipping the toe in might have to be permission chains, like we've already seen in Texas with in the oil and gas industry, like Topple is doing with some organic food producers, to to make it to where, okay, we're gonna show you the technology, but in a way where not everybody gets to look at it because that's worrisome. We're only gonna let you and your suppliers and a few others look at this.

Experts Talk

Part of this channel

Experts Talk

Industry experts debate the ideas that drive B2B decisions.

Visit the channel

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Energy starts with a company putting its field engineers, operations leads, and project developers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Developers and operators shortlist on credibility, and your engineers give your sales team something real to send.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

T
Transportation

Follow Energy Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Energy: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Energy buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Energy expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your field engineers, operations leads, and project developers into the articles, video, and social content Energy buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Energy Insights

The grid investment surge of 2026 is reshaping what utility operators must evaluate now

The grid investment surge of 2026 is reshaping what utility operators must evaluate now

Significant capital investments are being made in grid infrastructure, highlighted by a $1 billion raise for home batteries and a $510 million wind project in Mexico. These investments necessitate utility operators to re-evaluate their strategies and plans to accommodate changes and upgrades. Proper evaluation and adaptation by utility operators are essential to optimize the benefits of this grid investment surge.

  • 01A $1 billion investment in home battery technology is part of the growing grid infrastructure funding.
  • 02A Mexican wind project has secured $510 million, indicating strong investment in renewable energy.
  • 03Utility operators must adapt their strategies to effectively integrate new grid technologies and investments.

Aug 16, 2026

Transmission congestion cost the US grid $12B in 2024, and Texas's data center freeze is making the bottleneck worse

Transmission congestion cost the US grid $12B in 2024, and Texas's data center freeze is making the bottleneck worse

The U.S. grid is facing a significant financial burden due to transmission congestion, amounting to $12 billion in 2024. Texas is exacerbating the issue by pausing data center interconnections amid a large 474 GW queue. The Department of Energy's draft National Transmission Needs Study highlights these challenges.

  • 01Transmission congestion in the U.S. grid is expected to cost $12 billion in 2024.
  • 02Texas has paused data center interconnections, adding pressure to the existing grid bottleneck.
  • 03There is a 474 GW queue for data center interconnections in Texas.

Aug 16, 2026

Anaergia's 98% revenue jump and BHE Montana's EDAM move signal a maturing energy transition economy

Anaergia's 98% revenue jump and BHE Montana's EDAM move signal a maturing energy transition economy

Anaergia experienced a significant 98% increase in revenue, reflecting growth within the waste-to-energy sector. BHE Montana's involvement with EDAM indicates advancements in grid coordination and energy transition efforts. These developments highlight a maturing energy transition economy with tangible commercial outcomes.

  • 01Anaergia reported a 98% increase in revenue, showcasing the growth and potential in the waste-to-energy sector.
  • 02BHE Montana's engagement with EDAM highlights advancements in grid coordination within the energy transition sector.
  • 03The energy transition economy is increasingly delivering measurable commercial results.

Aug 16, 2026

Explore More Energy Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Energy.

Browse Energy Hub

About the Expert

T
Transportation

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Energy and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512