Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEnergy

US power sector CO2 emissions jumped 4% in 2025, just as SBTi opens its net-zero standard for comment

The US power sector's CO2 emissions increased by 4% in 2025 due to factors like coal usage and rising data center demand. Concurrently, the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has commenced its second public consultation on a new net-zero standard. This consultation aims to refine and establish guidelines for achieving comprehensive net-zero emissions targets.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Energy teams put it to work with Customer Stories & Case Studies.

By MarketScale Newsroom · Science Based Targets InitiativeSbtiPower SectorCo2 Emissions
Share
Learn this in 60 seconds

Key facts, context, and what it means, in one minute.

:60
0:001:00
US power sector CO2 emissions jumped 4% in 2025, just as SBTi opens its net-zero standard for comment

Key takeaways

01

US power sector CO2 emissions increased by 4% in 2025, driven by coal and data center demand.

02

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has opened a second public consultation on its net-zero standard.

03

SBTi's consultation seeks to set guidelines for achieving comprehensive net-zero emissions goals.

U.S. power sector carbon dioxide emissions rose 4%, or 58 million metric tons, in 2025, the U.S. Energy Information Administration reported on July 21. The increase was driven by record electricity generation, a sharp rebound in coal use, and accelerating demand from data centers and manufacturing facilities. Total energy-related CO2 emissions in the U.S. climbed 2%, or roughly 115 million metric tons, over the same period, according to Utility Dive's reporting on the EIA data.

The numbers land at an operationally inconvenient moment for power companies. The Science Based Targets initiative opened a second public consultation on its dedicated Power Sector Net-Zero Standard on July 15, and the comment window closes August 31, 2026. Utilities that have been watching from the sidelines now face a concrete deadline to either engage with the emerging rules or cede the standard-setting floor to others.

What drove the 2025 emissions increase

Net generation in the electric power sector surpassed 2024's record annual output, rising 3%, or 119 terawatthours, according to the EIA. Three forces converged: an unusually hot summer that set record peak demand for space cooling, continued build-out of energy-intensive manufacturing, and rapid expansion of data center load. Each of those demand drivers is structural rather than weather-dependent, which means the generation pressure is unlikely to reverse quickly.

Coal carried a disproportionate share of the additional generation. Coal-fired output jumped 13% in 2025, adding 78 million metric tons of CO2 to the power sector's total, as reported by Utility Dive. Natural gas generation fell 4%, trimming 23 million metric tons, but that reduction was not enough to offset coal's contribution. The net effect pushed power sector emissions to their highest level in recent years.

Change in US power sector CO2 by fuel type, 2025 vs. 2024 (MMmt)
U.S. Energy Information Administration via Utility Dive · © MarketScaleDownload chart

The sector's weight in the global picture is already substantial. The power sector accounts for nearly 40% of global energy-related CO2 emissions, according to figures the Science Based Targets initiative cites from the International Energy Agency. That share, combined with the sector's role as an enabler of electrification across transportation, buildings, and industry, makes it the highest-leverage point in any credible net-zero pathway.

SBTi's second consultation and what changed

The SBTi's updated Power Sector Net-Zero Standard draft reflects input from more than 120 stakeholders who participated in the first public consultation. The second draft aligns with the Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0, sharpens the scope of activities and emissions covered, and refines target-setting pathways, according to the SBTi. The initiative describes the changes as making science-based target setting more practical and actionable for power companies while preserving the scientific rigor that underpins its validation process.

A 13% coal generation surge in a single year is precisely the operational reality the SBTi's new power standard needs to address head-on if it wants credibility with practitioners.

Consultation materials include the main standard draft, a target-setting tool in spreadsheet form, a pathways specification document, and a pathways derivation document. All are available on the SBTi website. Feedback is submitted through a SurveyMonkey form, and the SBTi has published terms of reference for the project that detail governance and scope for companies wanting a fuller picture before they weigh in.

The draft standard is notable for its operational specificity. Rather than applying generic corporate net-zero logic to electricity companies, it attempts to reflect how utilities, independent power producers, and integrated energy companies actually operate across generation portfolios, grid services, and long-lived asset bases. For procurement and sustainability leaders building multi-year capital plans, the sectoral granularity matters: the final standard will likely become a reference point in RFPs, bond covenants, and supplier qualification frameworks.

Why the consultation window matters for operations teams

More than 11,000 companies globally have set science-based targets through the SBTi, according to the initiative. Those companies cite long-term competitive advantages as a key benefit, a claim that resonates differently now that the EIA has documented a sector-wide emissions reversal. Companies with validated targets and credible reduction plans are better positioned in procurement bids, regulatory discussions, and financing conversations where counterparties increasingly require emissions transparency.

For utilities and power-sector operations leaders, the August 31 deadline is both a compliance planning signal and a design opportunity. SBTi recommends that companies use the existing Quick Start Guide for Electric Utilities to set near-term targets while the Power Standard finalizes. Targets set under the current guidance are designed to be compatible with the incoming standard, reducing the rework risk. Companies that engage in the consultation also get advance visibility into the final requirements, a practical advantage when capital plans span decades.

What this means for your team

  • Review the SBTi Power Sector Net-Zero Standard second consultation draft before August 31 and submit formal feedback through the SurveyMonkey portal, particularly on target-setting pathways that affect your generation mix or long-lived asset strategy.
  • Map the EIA's 2025 emissions data against your own reported figures to identify whether your sector-level emissions performance is tracking ahead of or behind the power sector average, and document the gap for your next ESG disclosure cycle.
  • Use the Quick Start Guide for Electric Utilities to set or update near-term science-based targets now; SBTi has confirmed these targets will be compatible with the final Power Standard, reducing revalidation costs.
  • Evaluate whether data center and manufacturing electrification contracts in your demand portfolio are factored into your emissions intensity trajectory, since the EIA data flags these load categories as a primary driver of the 2025 increase.

Featured companies

About the author

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale NewsroomEditorial Team, MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

Energy: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Energy buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Energy expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's Energy expertise into the articles, video, and social content B2B marketing buyers in your industry are searching for. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Energy Insights

P&G absorbs a $1 billion war-cost hit and signals a flat-to-3% EPS growth year ahead

P&G absorbs a $1 billion war-cost hit and signals a flat-to-3% EPS growth year ahead

Procter & Gamble anticipates a financial impact of $1 billion due to the conflict in Iran. The company projects that its fiscal year 2027 adjusted earnings per share will see growth ranging from flat to 3%. This guidance suggests earnings of approximately $7 at the midpoint.

  • 01Procter & Gamble expects a $1 billion cost impact from the Iran conflict.
  • 02The company projects fiscal 2027 adjusted EPS growth from flat to 3%.
  • 03Anticipated earnings per share for 2027 are approximately $7 at the midpoint.

Aug 6, 2026

Mastercard's Q2 revenue jumps 14% to $9.28 billion as payment network volumes climb

Mastercard's Q2 revenue jumps 14% to $9.28 billion as payment network volumes climb

Mastercard reported a 14% increase in Q2 revenue, reaching $9.28 billion, driven by rising payment network volumes. The company's profit for the quarter was $4.39 billion, exceeding analyst expectations.

  • 01Mastercard's Q2 revenue rose by 14% to $9.28 billion.
  • 02The company's quarterly profit was $4.39 billion, surpassing analyst forecasts.
  • 03Payment network growth contributed significantly to Mastercard's financial performance.

Aug 6, 2026

Halliburton's Q2 revenue hits $5.71 billion, beating estimates on dual-segment growth

Halliburton's Q2 revenue hits $5.71 billion, beating estimates on dual-segment growth

Halliburton reported Q2 2026 revenue of $5.71 billion, marking a 3.7% increase from the previous year. The revenue surpassed analyst expectations by $210 million, driven by growth in its completion and drilling segments.

  • 01Halliburton's Q2 2026 revenue rose by 3.7% to $5.71 billion.
  • 02The company's revenue exceeded analyst estimates by $210 million.
  • 03Growth was fueled by its completion and drilling divisions.

Aug 6, 2026

Explore More Energy Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Energy.

Browse Energy Hub

About the Expert

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale Newsroom

Editorial Team

MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Energy and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512