Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

Should Teachers Use AI to Promote STEM Education?

ChatGPT, the viral chatbot launched by AI startup Open AI last November, seems to have become a nightmare for teachers. Students have been using it to cheat. In fact, a recent survey involving over 200 K-12 teachers found that more than a quarter of them had caught a student cheating with the help of…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Education Technology?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Education Technology coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

ChatGPT, the viral chatbot launched by AI startup Open AI last November, seems to have become a nightmare for teachers. Students have been using it to cheat. In fact, a recent survey involving over 200 K-12 teachers found that more than a quarter of them had caught a student cheating with the help of the chatbot. While many fear that these tools may affect students’ learning, is there a way teachers can use AI tools like ChatGPT productively with students? Some in education see it as an opportunity to leverage AI to promote STEM education.

So far, ChatGPT has already been banned by an increasing number of school districts. It does not seem like a surprise, then, that tools to detect AI-written text are already cropping up. Interestingly though, over two thirds of the K-12 teachers surveyed do not support the banning of this tool. Experts believe that ChatGPT can be used to augment STEM studies and help in essay writing without replacing its creative aspects. It can even be used to help plan lessons, create quizzes, explain basic physics (or complex engineering) problems.

Jason Innes, the director of curriculum, training, and product management at KinderLab Robotics, which aims to promote STEAM skills in K-12 curriculum, discussed the importance of using AI to promote STEM education among students.

Jason’s Thoughts:

“Generative AI tools like ChatGPT are impressive, but they’re not magic and they’re not creative. They use statistical models to remix and rehash existing writing. It’s important that we have tools like AI writing checks to prevent students from relying on generative AI tools to do their writing for them.

We need to teach the writing process with skills like researching, organizing, drafting, revising, getting feedback, skills that are short circuited by AI tools if children misuse them. But these generative AI tools also give us another opportunity to encourage students to understand these tools and think critically about them through STEM education.

At KinderLab, our mission is to promote universal STEM literacy. We achieve that by introducing young children, as young as four, to coding, computer science, and engineering with our KIBO robot. It’s important to introduce STEM and coding concepts in early childhood because research shows that starting children young with STEM has the greatest impact on their success in STEM education and their interest in STEM careers.

So, how does this relate to AI? Well, ChatGPT and tools like it are the products of STEM work. These tools will certainly continue to develop and we don’t know what AI tools today’s kindergartners will have access to in 10 years or 20 years. It’s vital that young students understand the nature and the limits of these tools.

Early STEM education where children learn at a young age about technology, computers, coding, and even AI is the key to giving children understanding and mastery of tools like ChatGPT. Future generative AI tools like it may end up becoming tools students can learn to use, but these tools will never replace human creativity and the creative process.

We want students to understand the tools, understand how they work and think critically about how they can be best used. That’s the best long-term response to the challenge these tools pose in education, and it requires early STEM education.”

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Education Technology Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Education Technology Insights

AI detectors are turning into audit tools, not enforcement, in higher ed

AI detectors are turning into audit tools, not enforcement, in higher ed

AI detection tools can be used to review student writing, but their results are not definitive. In 2026, colleges are putting more emphasis on AI literacy, assessment redesign and clear guidance for acceptable AI use than on detection alone.

  • 0186% student AI use (Digital Education Council survey, cited by Community College Daily) makes “ban and catch” workflows expensive at scale. Training, course design, and tool governance become the controllable levers.
  • 02OECD’s 2026 Outlook warns that better-looking work with GenAI can disappear or reverse on exams without it, a signal that assessment design is now a learning-outcomes control, not a pedagogy preference.

Sep 7, 2026

Workforce Pell will cover 8- to 15-week trades programs starting in July 2026

Workforce Pell will cover 8- to 15-week trades programs starting in July 2026

A final U.S. Department of Education rule makes 8- to 15-week training eligible for Pell Grants, effective July 20, 2026. Eligibility is tied to completion, employment, and earnings measures. For contractors and HR leaders, it adds a federal funding option for short-term technician training, if programs meet the rule’s standards.

  • 01The 70% completion and 70% employment thresholds turn Workforce Pell into a performance contract, not a blank-check subsidy, when selecting school partners.
  • 02For employers, written training agreements are now a procurement artifact: institutions can outsource up to 25% of instruction, and Registered Apprenticeship sponsors up to 49%, shaping how companies staff labs, instructors, and OJT.
  • 03State-by-state approval is the choke point. Governors and workforce boards decide which occupations qualify before federal sign-off, so multi-state employers will see uneven program availability.

Sep 5, 2026

Back-to-school IT teams are buying EdTech in a market where half the funding sits with 10 firms

Back-to-school IT teams are buying EdTech in a market where half the funding sits with 10 firms

New Market Pitch’s July 13, 2026 ranking says the top 10 EdTech startups hold about 50.2% of total funding in its filtered ranking; BYJU’S accounts for about 15.1% and is listed at about $6.0B raised. EdTech Digest’s 2011 profile of Wishbone describes an organization that links donors online with at-risk high school students to fund after-school and summer programs.

  • 01Funding tables can hide procurement risk: New Market Pitch lists some entries with “partial” confidence and flags “acquired” statuses without naming acquirers, so buyers should treat capital rankings as a starting point, not due diligence.
  • 02Some education initiatives behave like supply chains, not software: EdTech Digest’s description of Wishbone’s model highlights the operational work in vetting, publishing, funding, and progress updates, workflows that live outside the LMS.

Sep 4, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512