Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesTransportation

BTS freight dashboard update tracks rail, port, and trucking conditions weekly

The Bureau of Transportation Statistics released its latest weekly-updated freight indicators dashboard on July 7, 2026, covering port conditions, rail and truck performance, freight volumes, and transportation costs and labor. The dashboard had already shifted its rail series to CPKC in May 2025, replacing the frozen legacy CP and KCS data.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Transportation teams put it to work with Partner & Channel Enablement.

By MarketScale Newsroom · Bureau of Transportation StatisticsBtsSupply ChainFreight Indicators
Share
Listen to the audio brief

Key facts, context, and what it means.

AUDIO
0:00
BTS freight dashboard update tracks rail, port, and trucking conditions weekly

Key takeaways

01

The update enhances monitoring capabilities for transportation conditions.

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Transportation?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Transportation coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

The Bureau of Transportation Statistics released its latest supply chain and freight indicators on July 7, 2026, giving logistics, procurement, and operations teams a current read across every major freight mode. The dashboard, maintained by an interagency working group that spans the Departments of Transportation, Agriculture, Energy, Commerce, and Labor, pulls data weekly and covers four broad areas: port conditions, outside-the-gate rail and truck performance, freight movement volumes, and transportation costs and labor.

What the dashboard actually measures

On the port side, BTS tracks loaded import and export container volumes at select major gateways, empty export container moves, the number of containerships anchored offshore and awaiting berths, and total containership capacity calling at U.S. ports. The capacity series recently shifted from AIS-based vessel tracking to CBP's Vessel Management System, which counts only ships entering port for an official loading or unloading purpose. That change makes the current figures lower than historical comparisons under the prior methodology, a detail that matters when teams benchmark current port throughput against pre-2025 baselines.

Outside the gate, the dashboard covers average train speeds, terminal dwell times, and rail cars online by region and railroad. For trucking, it reports average truck speeds and Planning Time Index values at 10 interstate bottleneck locations, plus dedicated corridors around the Port of Los Angeles-Long Beach and the Port of New York-New Jersey. The PTI measures the ratio of 95th-percentile truck travel times to free-flow speeds within five miles of each port, which is a more useful reliability signal for drayage planning than average speed alone.

CPKC replaces CP and KCS in the rail series

One structural update operators should note: as of May 2025, BTS began publishing rail performance data under Canadian Pacific Kansas City, the merged entity created by the April 2023 combination of Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern. The legacy CP and KCS charts are now frozen. Any team using BTS rail data for benchmarking or contract analysis needs to shift its reference series to CPKC or reconcile the historical gap between the old and new reporting entities.

CPKC's network connects Canada, the U.S. Midwest and Gulf, and Mexico, so its velocity and dwell metrics are particularly relevant for cross-border supply chains moving automotive parts, agricultural commodities, and industrial inputs through central corridors.

Costs, labor, and demand signals

The costs and labor section includes truck spot rates broken out by load type, the Producer Price Index for both generalized and specialized trucking, downbound grain barge rates, and container freight rates from the U.S. Midwest and West Coast to Shanghai as well as from Shanghai to Los Angeles. The spot rate series covers DAT load board data, which BTS notes represents roughly one-tenth of the overall common carrier market. That context is important: spot rate movement signals directional pressure on contract rates but should not be read as a direct proxy for contracted carrier costs.

On labor, the dashboard pulls Bureau of Labor Statistics JOLTS data for the Transportation, Warehousing, and Utilities sector, tracking job openings, hires, and separations on a seasonally adjusted basis. It also reports non-farm payroll employment specifically for truck transportation and for warehousing and storage. Both series exclude owner-operators and independent contractors, so they reflect wage and salary workers. For fleet operators and 3PLs managing driver recruitment, the quits rate within the separation figures provides a useful forward signal on driver availability and wage pressure.

What this means for your team

  • Update any internal dashboards or benchmarking models that pull BTS rail data: the CP and KCS series are frozen, and CPKC is now the active reporting entity for that corridor.
  • Use the PTI metric at LA-LB and NY-NJ rather than average truck speed alone when evaluating drayage reliability; it captures variability, not just central tendency.
  • Cross-reference the Shanghai-to-LA container rate series against current contracted rates as a directional check on carrier pricing conversations.
  • When citing BTS labor data in workforce planning, confirm whether your analysis accounts for the exclusion of owner-operators, which can materially affect how the numbers compare to industry estimates that include independent contractors.

Sources

Featured companies

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Transportation starts with a company putting its fleet managers, logistics engineers, and safety leads on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Fleet and logistics buyers compare quietly, and your operators become the evidence that settles it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale NewsroomEditorial Team, MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

B2B Weekly

The week in Transportation, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Transportation: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Transportation buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Transportation expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your fleet managers, logistics engineers, and safety leads into the articles, video, and social content Transportation buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Transportation Insights

Nissan's Rogue Hybrid Is More Than a New Model. It Is a U.S. Manufacturing Bet.

Nissan's Rogue Hybrid Is More Than a New Model. It Is a U.S. Manufacturing Bet.

Nissan’s 2027 Rogue Hybrid, powered by the e-POWER series-hybrid system, aims to regain relevance in the U.S. compact SUV segment while supporting a bigger shift toward U.S. manufacturing. Nissan plans to launch the gas-powered 2027 Rogue from Smyrna, Tennessee, in the spring, import the Rogue Hybrid from Japan initially, and begin U.S. hybrid production next year—supporting its goal to build 80% of the vehicles it sells in the U.S. domestically by 2030.

  • 01Nissan is assessing whether demand could support a third production shift at its Smyrna and Canton facilities, which could lift U.S. output toward 1 million vehicles annually, up from about 487,000 in 2025.
  • 02The Rogue Hybrid uses e-POWER, a series-hybrid system where a gasoline engine generates electricity for dual electric motors, aiming for up to 40 mpg in city driving.
  • 03Nissan expects the first Rogue Hybrid models to arrive this fall, with the broader lineup following in early 2027. The company plans to launch the gas-powered 2027 Rogue from its Smyrna, Tennessee, plant in the spring, followed by U.S. hybrid production next year.

Sep 21, 2026

Tesla's Cybercab Is on Austin Streets. The Bigger Test Is Whether It Becomes a Fleet Platform.

Tesla's Cybercab Is on Austin Streets. The Bigger Test Is Whether It Becomes a Fleet Platform.

Tesla launched paid Cybercab rides in Austin on September 4, beginning a deliberately limited public deployment of its purpose-built autonomous vehicle for commercial service. For fleet operators and mobility companies, the critical question is whether Tesla can build the surrounding operational infrastructure—charging, maintenance, dispatch, insurance, and regulatory compliance—and whether it ultimately supports third-party ownership and operation beyond a Tesla-only fleet.

  • 01Tesla published an interest form seeking fleet operators, mobility hubs, and infrastructure partners for Cybercab commercial deployment, signaling the company may not own every vehicle on its network.
  • 02Removing human drivers eliminates the driver role but relocates operational tasks like vehicle inspection, maintenance exception handling, and edge-case response into software, remote support, and fleet operations staff.
  • 03NHTSA escalated its audit of Cybercab to a Special Order requiring sworn responses by September 30, establishing regulatory strategy as part of vehicle architecture rather than a post-engineering concern.

Sep 19, 2026

Geely says a European R&D office can’t quickly match its 13-year setup

Geely says a European R&D office can’t quickly match its 13-year setup

Geely says its 13-year China-Europe engineering system, built with Volvo through CMA, is hard to replicate just by opening a European R&D office. Engineer Kennet Pettersson says he has worked on more than twice as many platforms in 13 years at Geely as in 15 years at Saab and Volvo. Chery says it plans a UK R&D center this year.

  • 01One data point to measure against: Pettersson said he worked on three platforms in 15 years at Saab and Volvo, then more than double that in 13 years at Geely’s Sweden operation.
  • 02The two engineering cultures pull in opposite directions, European teams designing for needs five to 10 years out and Chinese teams building for now and changing fast, and Geely's stated answer is a negotiated middle, not a winner.
  • 03Chinese companies have invested in 130+ European parts makers since the mid-2000s, per Rhodium via the FT—raising new questions for suppliers about where cross-region engineering decisions get made.

Sep 19, 2026

Explore More Transportation Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Transportation.

Browse Transportation Hub

About the Expert

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale Newsroom

Editorial Team

MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Transportation and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512