Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesRetail

How Clientelling Technology is Transforming the In-Store Experience for Customers and Retailers

In this episode, originally published in 2023, Retail Refined host Melissa Gonzalez speaks with Olga Kotsur of Mercaux about modern clienteling and why retailers are rethinking store technology. The discussion ties together composability, in-store data capture, self-service, and sales attribution across channels.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Retail teams put it to work with Sales Enablement.

Promoted content from Retail Refined on MarketScale.

· Retail TechnologyClientelingPosOmnichannel Commerce
Share

Key takeaways

01

Olga Kotsur frames clienteling as a connected in-store and online experience that captures product interest even when no purchase happens and uses it for later personalization and engagement.

02

Kotsur says retailers are moving away from siloed point solutions toward end-to-end, modular platforms—adding POS capabilities so assisted selling, checkout, and other store workflows connect.

03

Kotsur argues self-checkout is driven less by novelty than by giving customers flexibility in how they interact, alongside retailers’ labor-cost pressures.

Free workspace

Turn your Retail expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

A shopper can leave a store without buying and still return online to complete the purchase. In this 2023 Retail Refined conversation, Melissa Gonzalez and Mercaux co-founder and CEO Olga Kotsur explore what retailers miss when they measure those interactions separately.

Kotsur’s definition of clienteling connects store visits, product interest and associate conversations with the customer’s next interaction online. The discussion moves from that definition to associate credit, composable store technology and the choice between self-service and assisted selling. Her central argument is that the store’s contribution extends beyond the transaction at its own checkout.

From associate tool to end-to-end store platform

Kotsur explains that Mercaux’s early focus was giving sales associates fast access to product inventory and customer information, with the aim of improving service while saving time at the point of interaction. In her telling, the “associate tool” model was a starting point—useful, but not sufficient once retailers began facing new operational demands and customer expectations across channels.

She describes a turning point as retailers confronted challenges like COVID-era shifts and the growing expectation of omnichannel fulfillment. In response, Kotsur argues the store cannot run on disconnected point solutions—where POS, assisted selling, clienteling, and kiosks operate separately—because the customer journey cuts across all of them. Her conclusion: retailers increasingly need a platform that digitizes the store journey end-to-end.

Kotsur positions Mercaux’s move into POS as a strategic response to that demand. She says retailers are becoming ready to deploy cloud and API-based POS systems, but they do not want a one-for-one replacement of legacy checkout alone. Instead, they want the rest of the store experience—selling tools, customer context, and workflows—to connect to the transaction layer so store execution matches the new role of the store.

What “clienteling” means when it’s more than purchase history

When Gonzalez asks where clienteling sits on the spectrum—from simply recognizing a repeat customer to understanding preferences and context—Kotsur answers by challenging how vague the term can be. She contrasts basic implementations (associates viewing limited customer info and past purchases) with a broader definition centered on truly personalized in-store experiences that remain connected to online activity.

In Kotsur’s definition, a store visit creates information beyond a receipt. She emphasizes capturing signals such as which products a customer considered, what they liked, and even that they chose not to buy. She presents this “non-purchase” data as valuable because it can feed later online personalization and engagement, rather than letting the in-store journey disappear once the shopper leaves.

She further describes clienteling as making customer data actionable for associates while also routing store-captured insights into downstream systems—such as marketing automation—so a retailer can treat an “abandoned store basket” more like an abandoned online cart. The mechanism she outlines is a unified view: sales interactions, customer preferences, and channel behavior all informing what message or offer appears next.

Kotsur’s definition of clienteling goes beyond purchase history: it includes product interest and store interactions even when no sale happens that day.

Attribution, incentives, and the reality of cross-channel selling

A key moment in the episode comes when Gonzalez recounts an in-store interaction where an associate asked her to purchase in the store so the store could receive credit. She interprets that as a sign of misaligned incentives: the shopper experience should stay consistent across channels, while the retailer’s internal crediting should not push customers into inconvenient behavior just to satisfy reporting structures.

Kotsur agrees and extends the point: if an associate creates interest and the customer buys online later, she believes that associate should still be rewarded. She frames this as recognizing that store teams contribute beyond same-day, in-store conversion—touching longer-term customer value. In her view, clienteling and omnichannel converge precisely at this attribution problem.

Composability and choice: why modular store tech shapes the experience

Gonzalez points to Mercaux’s Pulse of Retail 2023 report and asks why “composability” is becoming a shared aspiration among surveyed retailers. Kotsur explains it with a simple analogy: technology should behave like building blocks that can be configured and extended without forcing massive upgrades. She also describes the architectural idea of separating layers (such as back-end and front-end) so systems can be reused across channels.

The discussion then turns to self-service. Kotsur says some retailers invest in self-checkout partly to manage labor costs, but she emphasizes another driver: giving customers freedom to choose how they want to interact—through an associate, their own phone, or a device. She frames self-checkout as only one step, with self-discovery (checking stock, prices, and promotions independently) also playing a major role.

Kotsur and Gonzalez both stress that there is no single recipe across retail contexts. Kotsur ties this back to modularity: because retailers face different pressures (including inflation and labor shortages), they need the ability to start with self-service or assisted selling, then change direction as they learn. Composability, in her framing, is what makes that experimentation feasible without rebuilding everything each time.

Kotsur describes retailers starting with self-service and moving toward assisted selling, or doing the reverse. She argues that modular technology should allow both paths without rebuilding the platform.

The episode’s forward look: one device, blurred channels, and less waste

Asked in the 2023 interview to look three to five years ahead, Kotsur predicts simpler tools for associates: one device supporting inventory checks, customer profiles, remote selling and checkout, ideally through one app. She frames that as a way to make retail work easier. It is the episode’s forward-looking vision, rather than a report that every retailer has reached that point.

She also predicts the line between online and offline will keep fading from the customer’s perspective, with engagement measured across the journey rather than by channel. In her view, this convergence supports more relevant recommendations and offers, while also keeping associates connected to customers after they leave the store through conversational and remote selling approaches, including messaging-based outreach she referenced earlier.

Finally, Kotsur adds a less-discussed implication: better in-store technology can support sustainability goals by helping retailers move stock more quickly, transfer inventory between stores, and time discounting so products are not wasted. She links that to agility—knowing what to do with inventory before it becomes landfill—arguing that operational execution is part of improving retail experience, not separate from it.

Retail Refined

Part of this channel

Retail Refined

In-store technology and consumer experience trends for retail leaders.

Visit the channel

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Retail starts with a company putting its merchandising leads, store operations teams, and category managers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Category buyers trust operators, so your merchandising leads shorten the distance between first search and first call.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Retail, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Retail: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Retail buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Retail expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your merchandising leads, store operations teams, and category managers into the articles, video, and social content Retail buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Retail Insights

Lasko says shoppers now expect fans to purify the air

Lasko says shoppers now expect fans to purify the air

Lasko says consumers now want sphere designs, per-person set points and air purification, alongside 120 years of retailer trust and a Made in USA badge. Dyson's own site lists purifying heaters at $659.99 and $949.99. A March 2026 executive order directs the FTC to prioritize Made in USA enforcement.

  • 01Lasko says demand has moved from a box in the corner to sphere designs in fresh colors that shoppers show off to friends, with a temperature set point for each person in the house.
  • 02Dyson's own site lists purifying heaters at $659.99 and $949.99 with app control, the dearer one with sealed HEPA H13 filtration, a benchmark for buyers comparing purification claims and price.
  • 03Executive Order 14392, signed in March 2026, tells the FTC to prioritize Made in USA enforcement, so the badge Lasko prints on its packaging is a claim retailers can expect to be asked about.

Oct 29, 2026

FTC orders nine companies to say whether personal data shapes their prices and pay

FTC orders nine companies to say whether personal data shapes their prices and pay

The Federal Trade Commission issued Section 6(b) orders on Oct. 28 to nine airlines, ride-hailing, delivery and retail companies asking how they use personal data to set prices and driver pay. The orders are study orders, not enforcement actions, and recipients have 45 days to respond. Several of the companies have said publicly that they do not set individual prices from personal data.

  • 01The nine recipients are Delta, United, JetBlue, Lyft, Uber, DoorDash, Instacart, Target and Walmart, and they have 45 days to respond.
  • 02Section 6(b) authorizes studies without a specific law enforcement purpose, and the FTC has not accused any recipient of wrongdoing.

Oct 29, 2026

DoorDash agrees to buy Instacart for $17 billion as both companies report third quarter results

DoorDash agrees to buy Instacart for $17 billion as both companies report third quarter results

DoorDash and Instacart signed a definitive agreement on Thursday for DoorDash to buy the grocery marketplace at $65.00 a share in cash and stock, an equity value of about $17 billion. The announcement landed alongside third quarter results from both companies, and the deal is not expected to close until the end of 2027 or the first half of 2028.

  • 01Instacart holders can elect deal value of $65.00 a share, a 26% premium to the Oct. 22 close, with at least 75% of total consideration paid in cash.
  • 02Closing is expected at the end of 2027 or in the first half of 2028, after an Instacart shareholder vote and antitrust review in the US, Canada and Israel.
  • 03DoorDash targets $500 million or more in annual synergies and says it will reinvest more than all of them in the first year after closing.

Oct 29, 2026

Explore More Retail Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Retail.

Browse Retail Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Retail and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512