Distributed I/O vs. Centralized I/O Baggage Handling
Airports have critical baggage handling systems that can be centralized or distributed. Steve Reed from Kasa Controls & Automation discusses the benefits of distributed I/O systems over traditional centralized systems. He highlights that distributed systems offer easier installation, more granular data, and potential long-term cost savings despite higher initial costs.
This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Industrial IoT teams put it to work with AI Visibility (GEO).
Key takeaways
Distributed I/O systems are easier to install and offer more detailed data than centralized systems.
Centralized systems may have lower initial costs but could lead to higher maintenance expenses.
Educating electricians and installers about distributed systems can aid in reducing installation and testing time.
Get featured
Want to get featured in MarketScale Industrial IoT?
Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Industrial IoT coverage. No credit card, no demo required.
For airports, baggage handling is a critical component in all aspects of the travel experience. The right systems and process in place mean safe and reliable baggage delivery to the people who put their trust in the airports to ensure a flawless transition from A-Z.
Airports use two types of systems for baggage handling, distributed and centralized I/O. Steve Reed, VP of Engineering & Safety for Kasa Controls & Automation, spoke about these two systems to help sort out the similarities and differences and identify which approach makes the most sense for today’s baggage-handling needs.
The debate centers on the location of the I/O (Input/output) module.
“Is it located near the processor, which is a more centralized system, or is it distributed, where the I/O is located more closely to the field device itself?,” Reed said.
While centralized I/Os are more traditional, Reed feels the distributed I/O model provides many advantages.
“It’s easier to see how wiring configuration with a distributed system,” Reed said. “It’s also easier to install and replace faulty components.”
And, because the I/O is out in the field, distributed systems make the information more granular from the device.
Centralized systems may still be the norm in many facilities due to the initial lower build costs and contractors’ traditional mindset. But is that lower upfront cost sacrificing better performance, more useful data, critical time saving of baggage handling, and expensive maintenance and replacement?
“The long-term cost of ownership the best solution may be a distributed system, but because the initial cost is higher, often centralized systems still win the bid today,” Reed said. “That said, one way to help fix that is to get more electricians and installers to understand the advantages of a distributed system with regards to how long it takes to install. It significantly reduces the installation and testing time during the initial build.”
Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!
Twitter – @MarketScale
Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale
LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale
Your experts belong here
Every story in MarketScale Industrial IoT starts with a company putting its controls engineers, plant-floor specialists, and integration partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.
Plant and controls buyers research deep before contact, and your engineers get to shape that research.
About the author
