Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Mergers Have Defined Healthcare in Recent Years, but They Aren’t the Only Way Forward

Merger announcements have dominated recent news in healthcare. In 2018, Advocate Health Care merged with Aurora Health Care to form Advocate Aurora Health, one of the largest not-for-profit systems in the country. But that merger only took place after Advocate spent two and a half years and $15 million on a failed attempt to unite…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Merger announcements have dominated recent news in healthcare. In 2018, Advocate Health Care merged with Aurora Health Care to form Advocate Aurora Health, one of the largest not-for-profit systems in the country. But that merger only took place after Advocate spent two and a half years and $15 million on a failed attempt to unite with NorthShore University HealthSystem.[1] And Catholic Health Initiatives and Dignity Health recently merged to create CommonSpirit Health after more than two years of challenging negotiations.[2] However, recent developments show that a merger is not always the way to go. Rumors circulated for months that St. Louis-based Ascension Health was considering a merger with Renton, Washington’s Providence St. Joseph Health, to create the nation’s largest system of hospitals. But the two health systems ultimately decided to shelve talks, opting to restructure their organizations instead.[3]

A particularly striking example of a merger exploration that ended before completion is that between Baylor Scott & White Health and Memorial Hermann Health System. The systems recently announced they had dissolved their consolidation plan after previously signing a letter of intent and conducting months of talks.[4] The deal would have combined two of the most well-known hospital systems in Texas to create the largest nonprofit integrated delivery system in the state, and possibly the southwest.[5] In a joint statement the two hospital systems said, “Ultimately, we have concluded that as strong, successful organizations, we are capable of achieving our visions for the future without merging at this time,” adding, “We will continue to seek opportunities for collaboration as two forward-thinking, mission-driven organizations.”[6] Ultimately, consolidation is the right move for some organizations, but many independent hospitals simply don’t want to be acquired or take part in a major merger.

As stated in our previous post, by design, stand-alone hospitals differ significantly from their larger counterparts. They value their independence, flexibility, and freedom from corporate mandates or value extraction that could ultimately detract from care. They are fixtures in their communities and have formed generational relationships with the patients they serve. They pride themselves on their agility and aptitude to bypass large-system bureaucracy.[7] Though there are undeniable strengths to remaining independent, there are just as many challenges. One of them is size and scale, which puts smaller hospitals in a difficult position when negotiating with insurers and suppliers. Often, they don’t have the perceived stature of larger systems to command the desired results. Mergers are one way to build scale, but it isn’t the only way. TPC offers an alternative that allows hospitals to remain independent while gaining the benefits of economies of scale and the shared knowledge of a larger system.

TPC creates a virtual system of independent, community-based hospitals that together achieve sizable tangible value that lowers costs and enables Members to remain competitive. By way of standardization and performance optimization at the financial, operational, and clinical levels, TPC builds a framework for hospitals to remain independent but take advantage of their collective size to achieve similar results to national systems. This approach allows stand-alone hospitals to remain agile, while also providing access to the resources and benefits that only large scales allow. It’s the perfect solution for hospitals disinterested in merging, but wary of remaining isolated in an industry undergoing major change.

Stronger Together. Superior Results. To learn more about the TPC and their vision for healthcare, just visit: http://www.tpc1.com/who-we-are/

[1] https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-advocate-aurora-merger-done-20180403-story.html

[2] https://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20190201/NEWS/190209994

[3] https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2018/03/29/providence-st-joseph-ascension-merger-on-hold.html

[4] https://www.healthexec.com/topics/healthcare-economics/baylor-scott-white-memorial-hermann-wont-merge

[5] https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/strategy/baylor-health-care-system-scott-white-merge

[6] https://www.bizjournals.com/dallas/news/2019/02/05/merger-called-off-between-baylor-scott-white.html

[7] https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/hospital-transactions-and-valuation/to-merge-or-not-to-merge-benefits-challenges-and-the-future-for-stand-alone-hospitals.html

0 Likes

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Healthcare Insights

The EU’s MDR delay buys time, but it won’t clear your commissioning bottleneck

The European Commission backed extending EU MDR transition deadlines to December 2027 and December 2028, Medical Design & Outsourcing reported. It buys time, not ramp-up capacity. Design News cites digital commissioning and machine digital twins to cut “power-on” surprises and speed validation and operator training.

  • 01If an EU portfolio includes Class III, December 2027 is now the planning anchor, but the internal gating item may shift to validation capacity and automation readiness, not paperwork.
  • 02Digital commissioning is becoming a procurement spec, not a buzzword, because it lets teams run DFM/DFA learning loops before hardware is built, which Design News notes is meant to reduce machine power-on surprises.

Sep 5, 2026

HCA’s Q1 was not about volume. It was about coverage and collecting cash

HCA Healthcare reaffirmed 2026 guidance after Q1 weather and a muted respiratory season cut adjusted EBITDA by about $180 million, according to HealthLeaders and Fierce Healthcare. Payer mix shifted fast. Exchange admissions fell about 15% and uninsured admissions rose about 16%, Fierce reported.

  • 01A mild flu season can be a margin event: HCA tied a 42% drop in respiratory admissions to a roughly $180M adjusted EBITDA hit (HealthLeaders, Fierce Healthcare).
  • 02The 2026 risk is sliding from demand to coverage: HCA cited a $600M–$900M full-year EBITDA headwind from exchange-related changes, with $150M already in Q1 (HealthLeaders, Fierce Healthcare).
  • 03Supplemental payments are becoming an operating capability, not a windfall: HCA said Q1 Medicaid program net benefit was about $200M vs $80M expected (HealthLeaders, Fierce Healthcare), putting state-by-state reimbursement strategy on the CFO’s critical path.

Sep 5, 2026

Dental practice exits are turning into multi-year projects, not last-year decisions

Dental practice exits are turning into multi-year projects, not last-year decisions

Associate-led dental practice successions can take 3–5+ years. Dental Economics says associate-to-buyout timelines often run three to five-plus years. That pushes revenue-cycle controls, buy-sell terms, and tax structure earlier, before a buyer appears.

  • 01A practical benchmark is emerging for succession: bringing in an associate with intent to buy can take a minimum of three years and often more than five, according to Dental Economics.
  • 02If accounts receivable looks “high,” it may be a bookkeeping and posting problem before it is a payer problem, a revenue-cycle diagnostic Group Dentistry Now says shows up frequently at scale.
  • 03Exit planning is now an operating system project: valuation, tax positioning, and transition support belong in the same workstream, because deal structure can lock in or foreclose tax options, per Dental Economics.

Sep 4, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512