Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Medicare Proposes a Lower Physician Fee Schedule for 2023

The discrepancy between Medicare and private insurance physicians’ reimbursement has grown over the past 30 years and with the proposed decrease to the Medicare physician fee schedule, private insurers may be left to make up the difference. ExpertInsuranceReviews.com’s health insurance expert, Melanie Musson explores strategies to avoid higher costs. Medicare Pays Far Less Than Private…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

The discrepancy between Medicare and private insurance physicians’ reimbursement has grown over the past 30 years and with the proposed decrease to the Medicare physician fee schedule, private insurers may be left to make up the difference. ExpertInsuranceReviews.com’s health insurance expert, Melanie Musson explores strategies to avoid higher costs.

Medicare Pays Far Less Than Private Insurers

No one can deny that the Medicare system has challenges. Hospital systems, government agencies, and healthcare providers have been working through these issues for years. For example, in 1993, the National Institute of Health Medicare and Medicaid Research Review released a report sharing that Medicare paid 76% of what private insurance paid for physician services.

That discrepancy has only increased over time so that as of May of 2022, the Kaiser Family Foundation reported that Medicare paid about 70% of what private insurers paid for physician services.

Medicare Proposes a Lower Physician Fee Schedule for 2023

Recently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released their proposed physician fee schedule for 2023 in which physician fees are cut by 4.5%. While the economic market is volatile and inflation has led to increasing costs for hospitals and physicians, this pay cut could have a significant impact on private insurers.

Likely, physicians will take a multi-faceted approach to make up for these losses and remain solvent.

For example, they may put a cap on the number of Medicare patients they will accept, and they could try to cut costs by employing digital scheduling. Some specialists, like audiologists, may refuse Medicare patients altogether. But no matter what other strategies they employ, they will almost certainly increase costs for private insurers.

While individual doctors don’t have much say in what the U.S. government decides they’ll pay for services, they have more ability to charge private insurers higher fees.

The Proposed Medicare Fee Schedule’s Impact on Private Insurance

If the proposed fee schedule is enacted, private insurers will need to look at ways to cut costs to make up for the inevitable increase in their physician fees. They may need to examine streamlining requirements for patients.

Private insurers may need to follow Medicare’s lead in some areas. For example, another proposed change for Medicare is the elimination of required referrals before recipients can see specific specialists. Perhaps eliminating the cost of a doctor’s visit for the sole purpose of obtaining a referral could be a way to cut costs.

It’s time for private insurers to comment and resist the proposed physician fee cuts. They’re already paying unfairly higher fees than Medicare is, and if the delicate balance of premiums and claims is disrupted by the decreased Medicare physician fee schedule, private insurers could start facing financial trouble.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Healthcare Insights

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are choosing alliances over mergers, per a July McDermott Will & Schulte analysis and four July deals tracked by Becker's Hospital Review. St. Christopher's, Nemours, Jefferson and Temple signed a nonbinding alliance letter; Palomar UC San Diego Health launched July 1. Ownership stays put; governance, purchasing and outpatient investment absorb the change.

  • 01In an alliance, the contract does the integrating that an org chart does in a merger: McDermott Will & Schulte says governance design, exclusivity, antitrust review, community commitments and exit rights all have to be settled before signing.
  • 02Purchasing is now explicitly on the table in at least one no-ownership deal, the St. Peter's Health and Billings Clinic-Logan Health talks in Montana, which means shared supply contracts can arrive without a change of control.

Sep 19, 2026

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

An Ophthalmology Times commentary by T.Y. Alvin Liu, Ferdinand Hui and Phillip Phan sorts eye patients into three telemedicine tiers by clinical need. Patients needing regular OCT scans benefit less unless a home device can send the image. Video tools already sit inside Epic and Cerner; the deciding purchase for retina clinics is the imaging device in the patient's living room.

  • 01The dividing line for eye telemedicine is imaging, not video: patients who need regular OCT scans benefit less from remote visits unless a device at home can send the scan, so a video license alone shifts few of those encounters.
  • 02The provider-side requirement, a HIPAA-compliant secured video platform, was already built into Epic and Cerner by 2020; the patient-side requirements (1.5 MB up and down bandwidth, a quiet private room, comfort with the technology) sit outside the health system's control and are the ones worth screening for at scheduling.
  • 03Self-administered home color fundus photography for tracking non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy was named as the nearer route into retina telemedicine; home OCT for wet AMD is the harder gate and the device to watch.

Sep 19, 2026

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Wolters Kluwer Health argues value-based care software is judged on whether customers hit incentive thresholds and avoid penalties. A Fierce Healthcare-reported survey it cites puts value-based care at a quarter or more of revenue for 30% of organizations. The analysis is a vendor publication that ends by pitching its own UpToDate Connect API.

  • 01The sharper question for any population health or care coordination platform is whether it changes what a clinician does at the moment of decision, or only reports afterward what happened. Wolters Kluwer's reading of the evidence is that many platforms still struggle with the first.
  • 02Vendors selling into value-based contracts now face a build-or-license decision on clinical content, because Wolters Kluwer names current, trusted content, consistent clinician adoption across sites, and a traceable link from guidance to quality metrics as the three hard problems.

Sep 18, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512