Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Forging Connections: Flipping CAPA on Its Head with Prevention

Waste and lost money run rampant in various sectors, and healthcare and pharmaceuticals are no exception. Bethany Kearney, Director of Enablement for Sparta Systems, and Zillery Fortner, Product Advisor, QA/RA Life Sciences at Sparta Systems, joined Forging Connections Host Michelle Dawn Mooney to discuss flipping corrective and preventive action (CAPA) on its head through preventive…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

Waste and lost money run rampant in various sectors, and healthcare and pharmaceuticals are no exception. Bethany Kearney, Director of Enablement for Sparta Systems, and Zillery Fortner, Product Advisor, QA/RA Life Sciences at Sparta Systems, joined Forging Connections Host Michelle Dawn Mooney to discuss flipping corrective and preventive action (CAPA) on its head through preventive measures.

Fortner provided an example of how reusable medical devices like gowns would rip after 40 uses or so when they were supposed to last for 100 lifecycles. The safety complaints stopped at a high level instead of digging down deep to find the root cause. Issues were accredited to “human error” or incorrect repair. “There wasn’t global communication between the different facilities. There were multiple issues going on. Multiple times it was closed in CAPA, saying it was fixed. When it came down to it, the true root cause was a chemical reaction,” Fortner stated. Addressing the actual cause would have saved millions of dollars.

“Finding the true root cause is very complex. It’s easy to blame a human, and if the firm is 100 percent focused on metrics, then finding the true root cause is going to be very challenging. Because in some cases, it is costly,” Kearney explained. She added, “It’s much more costly to not know that true root cause,” and that “putting in the time to do it right is really where the value is.”

The key is to follow the seven steps of the CAPA process. Fortner listed them as identifying the problem, evaluating the problem, developing and investigating, analyzing the problem, creating an action plan, implementing it, and analyzing the effectiveness.

Fortner added that prevention is essential, and companies should plan, do, check, act…Lacking support from the right stakeholders will cause you to struggle and make the process difficult. It is also imperative not to play the blame game and to understand why the mistake happened, fix it, and ensure the fix works.

When CAPAs go awry, this can cause incredibly costly issues. “A recall is just one part of doing something wrong or not really, truly understanding the problem,” stated Fortner. “A recall process can cost up to 600 million dollars, according to research from McKinsey. The medical device industry spends around 5 billion dollars a year on recalls. This expense we can’t ignore because lives are at risk. Every minute that a defective product stays out on the market is another opportunity for someone to be injured.”

“The payoff to doing CAPA right, I don’t think you can measure,” stated Fortner.

For more podcasts from Forging Connections, visit Apple iTunes or Spotify.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Healthcare Insights

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are choosing alliances over mergers, per a July McDermott Will & Schulte analysis and four July deals tracked by Becker's Hospital Review. St. Christopher's, Nemours, Jefferson and Temple signed a nonbinding alliance letter; Palomar UC San Diego Health launched July 1. Ownership stays put; governance, purchasing and outpatient investment absorb the change.

  • 01In an alliance, the contract does the integrating that an org chart does in a merger: McDermott Will & Schulte says governance design, exclusivity, antitrust review, community commitments and exit rights all have to be settled before signing.
  • 02Purchasing is now explicitly on the table in at least one no-ownership deal, the St. Peter's Health and Billings Clinic-Logan Health talks in Montana, which means shared supply contracts can arrive without a change of control.

Sep 19, 2026

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

An Ophthalmology Times commentary by T.Y. Alvin Liu, Ferdinand Hui and Phillip Phan sorts eye patients into three telemedicine tiers by clinical need. Patients needing regular OCT scans benefit less unless a home device can send the image. Video tools already sit inside Epic and Cerner; the deciding purchase for retina clinics is the imaging device in the patient's living room.

  • 01The dividing line for eye telemedicine is imaging, not video: patients who need regular OCT scans benefit less from remote visits unless a device at home can send the scan, so a video license alone shifts few of those encounters.
  • 02The provider-side requirement, a HIPAA-compliant secured video platform, was already built into Epic and Cerner by 2020; the patient-side requirements (1.5 MB up and down bandwidth, a quiet private room, comfort with the technology) sit outside the health system's control and are the ones worth screening for at scheduling.
  • 03Self-administered home color fundus photography for tracking non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy was named as the nearer route into retina telemedicine; home OCT for wet AMD is the harder gate and the device to watch.

Sep 19, 2026

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Wolters Kluwer Health argues value-based care software is judged on whether customers hit incentive thresholds and avoid penalties. A Fierce Healthcare-reported survey it cites puts value-based care at a quarter or more of revenue for 30% of organizations. The analysis is a vendor publication that ends by pitching its own UpToDate Connect API.

  • 01The sharper question for any population health or care coordination platform is whether it changes what a clinician does at the moment of decision, or only reports afterward what happened. Wolters Kluwer's reading of the evidence is that many platforms still struggle with the first.
  • 02Vendors selling into value-based contracts now face a build-or-license decision on clinical content, because Wolters Kluwer names current, trusted content, consistent clinician adoption across sites, and a traceable link from guidance to quality metrics as the three hard problems.

Sep 18, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512