Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEnergy

What is the Best Material for Utility Poles?

They’re a familiar sight – they line city blocks and country roads, carrying powerlines and serving utilities. Utility poles come in a variety of materials and designs, but what material actually provides the best combination of performance, cost, and environmental impact reduction? Let’s take a look at some of the key materials used, how they…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Energy teams put it to work with Customer Stories & Case Studies.

·
Share
What is the Best Material for Utility Poles?

Free workspace

Turn your Energy expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

They’re a familiar sight – they line city blocks and country roads, carrying powerlines and serving utilities. Utility poles come in a variety of materials and designs, but what material actually provides the best combination of performance, cost, and environmental impact reduction?

Let’s take a look at some of the key materials used, how they differ, and which might be the best long-term solution for utilities looking to keep pace with increasing demand.

Steel vs Wood Utility Poles

Wood utility poles can be made of many materials, though woods like southern pine are common. However, this isn’t the only material that contributes to the final product – chromated copper arsenic (CCA) is often used to treat wooden utility poles to prevent termite infection and overall decay.

Still, even with these measures – which can have adverse effects on the environment to begin with – wood utility poles are certainly not permanent installations. An Electric Power Research study estimated that wood utility poles can last up to 50 years, though 30 to 40 years of true service life is more common.

Steel utility poles can be manufactured to the same dimensions as wooden poles but require no harsh chemical treatments. They’re often galvanized to protect them from corrosion and other harsh elements. It’s been estimated that steel utility poles can exhibit service lives of 50-80 years.

While wood is generally considered a green material, the actual impact of wood utility poles on our shared environment is greater than you might imagine.

In addition to their treatment with CCA, the harvesting and manufacturing of wood utility poles can actually release more greenhouse gases and aerosols than that of steel utility poles. Electricity is required to produce CCA in the first place, and shorter lifetimes mean more truck rolls, more emissions, and more destruction of the habitats of potentially endangered species.

Steel utility poles, on the other hand, exhibit far less environmental impact. Though steel production and galvanization is not without environmental impact whatsoever, it is generally lesser, and the longer lifespans of steel utility poles also leads to key energy savings.

From Lower Life Cycle Cost to Ease of Installation: Steel Utility Poles Provide a Vast Number of Benefits

In addition to the environmental benefits, steel utility poles also exhibit:

  • More uniform dimensions
  • No need for treatment with harsh chemicals (that eventually end up in landfills)
  • Easy installation
  • Greater durability, particularly when galvanized
  • Lower overall life cycle cost due to longer service life
  • Superior strength and resistance to damage during service
  • Lower weights – often 30% lighter and as much as 70% lighter
  • Clean, appealing aesthetics
  • 100% recyclability

Steel Utility Poles Excel in Comprehensive Study

A study commissioned by the Steel Market Development Institute and conducted by SCS Global Services sought to analyze the performance of 45-foot-tall, Class 2/Grade B steel utility poles and wood utility poles in the southeastern U.S. over the course of a 40-year horizon.

As the study outlines, “two different scenarios were compared – one in which wood poles were taken out of service as a result of pole failure and continued to be replaced by Class 2 wood poles, and the other in which wood poles taken out of service due to pole failure were replaced by galvanized steel utility poles.”

The study confirmed the general belief that steel utility poles, over the totality of their service life, exhibit a much smaller environmental impact than their wood utility pole counterparts, which were assumed to need replacement every 40 years. The steel utility poles were assumed to have an 80-year service life.

The study’s key findings were that:

  • The steel utility pole scenario would use 300,000 fewer barrels of oil over 40 years
  • The steel utility pole scenario would impact the habitats of three species, whereas the wood utility pole scenario would impact seven
  • Approximately 15 acres of terrestrial biome would be disturbed by the steel utility pole scenario compared to 12,000 for wood utility poles
  • In the wood utility pole scenario, the CCA used would result in nearly 600,000 tons of waste over 40 years

Steel Utility Poles Ready to Shine as Utility Demands Grow

The demand for energy has asked a lot of utility companies, and that means saving money wherever possible. By choosing more cost-effective steel utility poles, utilities can not only save resources and money, but lower their environmental impact and install solutions set to last much longer than wood utility poles.

To learn more about AZZ’s role in the galvanization of steel utility poles, contact them today.

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @MarketScale

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Energy starts with a company putting its field engineers, operations leads, and project developers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Developers and operators shortlist on credibility, and your engineers give your sales team something real to send.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Energy, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Energy: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Energy buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Energy expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your field engineers, operations leads, and project developers into the articles, video, and social content Energy buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Energy Insights

Solar panels installed in 2020 could supply 21% of solar silver by 2035

Solar panels installed in 2020 could supply 21% of solar silver by 2035

Recycling solar panels installed in 2020 could supply up to 21% of the silver needed for new panel production by 2035. Technical advances are making panel recycling more economic. Buyers and asset owners can start modeling recycled supply and retirement value.

  • 01Panels installed in 2020 could supply up to 21% of the silver needed for solar panel production in 2035, a 15-year lag that suggests recycled supply could be estimated from installation records.
  • 02European researchers estimate recycling could cover about 25% of cobalt and 15% of lithium, nickel and manganese supply by 2030.
  • 03A recycler's recovery rate means little without its purity: TNO's laser process reported roughly 97% yield with silver at 99.7% purity, the pairing that tells a manufacturer whether the metal is usable.

Oct 2, 2026

Massachusetts queue delays put 2027 solar tax credits at risk

Massachusetts queue delays put 2027 solar tax credits at risk

Catalyst Power says interconnection delays are now a tax-credit risk, not just a schedule risk. In Massachusetts, a project tied to a 2029 transmission upgrade could miss the Dec. 31, 2027 deadline that SEIA says now governs many solar projects, putting 30% to 50% of ITC value at risk.

  • 01SEIA says solar projects that begin construction after July 4, 2026 must be placed in service by Dec. 31, 2027.
  • 02FERC's cluster-study reforms set study deadlines and late-study penalties, but they do not guarantee a needed grid upgrade finishes before a project's tax clock runs out.

Oct 2, 2026

Only 33% of utility executives call asset management advanced, IFS survey finds

Only 33% of utility executives call asset management advanced, IFS survey finds

Fifty-seven percent of utility executives call AI critical to cutting costs. Only 33% rate their asset lifecycle management as advanced, and 49% report operational data silos.

  • 01Fifty-seven percent of utility executives call AI critical to cutting costs, but only 33% rate the asset management that AI would run on as advanced.
  • 02Half of executives say asset management runs in silos with limited predictive capability, suggesting early AI spend may go to data integration before models.
  • 03Pew says grid modernization capex is pressuring rates; it also says using DERs via virtual power plants could serve peak demand at 40%–60% of traditional costs and help defer or avoid some infrastructure upgrades.

Sep 30, 2026

Explore More Energy Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Energy.

Browse Energy Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Energy and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512