Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

From Presidents to Children: Why Behavioral Threat Assessment Matters

In the ever-evolving landscape of security, one component remains crucial for protecting both the President of the United States and America’s children: behavioral threat assessment. Recent reports from the United States Secret Service reveal that identifying concerning behaviors is key to preventing attacks, with a clear pattern emerging across numerous incidents. This article dives…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Promoted content from ASAP Security on MarketScale.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Education Technology expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

In the ever-evolving landscape of security, one component remains crucial for protecting both the President of the United States and America’s children: behavioral threat assessment. Recent reports from the United States Secret Service reveal that identifying concerning behaviors is key to preventing attacks, with a clear pattern emerging across numerous incidents. This article dives into the importance of behavioral threat assessment and its potential to avert harm before it occurs.

The Core Question of the Conversation:

How can behavioral threat assessment help safeguard individuals, be it high-profile figures like the President or vulnerable children?

In a recent episode of SecurED, Host Mike Matranga engages in a thought-provoking discussion with security expert and Co-Host, Mike Monsive. The conversation delves into the significance of behavioral threat assessment, exploring its relevance in protecting diverse targets and why it remains an integral part of security planning.

Main points from the episode:

  • The foundation of every security plan relies on identifying behavioral signals that indicate a potential threat, irrespective of the target’s profile.
  • Insights from the United States Secret Service reports reveal the consistent exhibition of warning signs by attackers before carrying out their actions.
  • Implementing behavioral threat assessment processes, not only in schools but also in various settings, holds the potential to prevent incidents and provide necessary support to individuals in distress.

Co-Host Bio:

Mike Monsive is a dynamic serial entrepreneur who thrives on the challenges of business and the gratification of building value through perseverance and dedication. With a passion for creating opportunities, they are driven by the ability to empower those around them to achieve their personal and professional dreams. With decades of experience in the low voltage industry, Monsive has honed their skills in designing and even manufacturing innovative solutions to address intricate problems. Their unwavering commitment to crime prevention and the deterrence of criminals fuels their undying passion for enhancing security measures.

Video TranscriptExpand ↓

Even going deeper than I mean, you know, one of the most important components to all of this is the behavioral threat assessment. Right? I've told people this a hundred times, and I'll continue to say it. The foundation of every security plan. It doesn't matter if it's protecting the president of the United States. Or if it's protecting America's kids, those that want to attack us are always signaling some type of behavior that leads us to believe that they wanna do this harm. You know, if you look at the the most recent publication from the United States Secret Service, that was published in January. We just had another one that came out yesterday, the bystander. It's a it's a supplement to the report that came out in two thousand eight. That said that at least one means of communication, and all of these incidents had occurred before these people took action. Right? And so looking back at the January twenty twenty three release, they investigated a hundred and seventy three cases from two thousand sixteen until twenty twenty two. And there was a hundred and eighty attackers in those hundred and seventy three instances and one hundred percent of all those attackers, they all exhibited the same signs and symptoms. And so, you know, imagine the power that we could have by just simply having a process of identifying these kids based upon their patterns of behavior. Not only kids, but even adults because we know that you're more likely to have, you know, an active shooter or a workplace violence incident than you are an attack on a school. On a school, you're more likely to have a suicidal kid than you are a homicidal kid. And so you talk about, you know, are we ever measured? I can tell you at Texas City, we had a pretty good process, and we knew which kids were the ones that we needed to watch, not punitively, but from, you know, just a general overview and curiosity of you know, they're exhibiting signs and symptoms of pre attack behavior, whether it be themself or on someone else. And I can tell you we were in the double digits of kids that we made contact with that wanted to hurt themselves, and we were able to get them the help that they need. Do you think that the general public in Texas City knows that? They absolutely don't. Let me put you in the hot seat for a moment, though. Okay. Uh-oh. So that was that was when you were safety and security director. Correct. And so many times we have seen gone into an organization where there might be some framework or there may have been plans that were there. And at some point, there was some type of foundational knowledge it has not been updated. It might be a decade old. Oh, yeah. And and it it doesn't take into to consideration today's current threats or how the landscape had changed around the facility or whatever because that person left. Alright. And so these were things that you were doing. And now that you're not in that position, do you think that those same things are happening? Do they still have those those knowledge? Is that outreach happening. I can one hundred percent say I don't believe so. Okay. But that's that's part of this process. Right? And I think that's where we have to get engaged with the organizations and not individuals.

ASAP Security

Part of this channel

ASAP Security

Physical security expertise for facilities, campuses, and commercial properties.

Visit the channel

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Education Technology, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Education Technology Insights

AI didn't break integrity, it exposed credentialism

AI didn't break integrity, it exposed credentialism

AI has exposed a flaw in higher education that predates generative AI: institutions designed around earning credentials rather than demonstrating learning. Phil Hill argues that better cheating detection won't fix this; instead, schools must rebuild assessments around actual learning outcomes, using approaches like competency-based education, authentic assessment, and dual-stream frameworks that accommodate AI while verifying individual capability.

  • 01Credentialism—treating the credential as the goal rather than evidence of learning—creates incentives for shortcuts that existed before AI; students pursue credentials as boxes to check rather than milestones in learning.
  • 02States like Michigan and Texas are redefining postsecondary credentials to include skill certificates alongside degrees, but broader definitions only matter if assessment measures actual learning, not just completion.
  • 03Promising approaches to AI in assessment include competency-based education, authentic assessment methods, and frameworks like Sydney's with AI and proctoring components.

Oct 6, 2026

Lewis University picks Ellucian Student to support its 2026–2029 strategic plan

Lewis University picks Ellucian Student to support its 2026–2029 strategic plan

Lewis University, which serves more than 7,000 students, will move to Ellucian Student, HCM and Finance. The rollout runs through Project Tailwind, a key part of the university's 2026–2029 Taking Flight strategic plan. The release lists support for a growing population of traditional, online, workforce and lifelong learners among the platform's goals.

  • 01Excelsior University deployed Scholarship Universe early while its Ellucian Student implementation is still ongoing.

Oct 2, 2026

CoSN tells school districts to plan for adoption before they buy new tech

CoSN tells school districts to plan for adoption before they buy new tech

CoSN's 2026 Blaschke Report and companion toolkit give K-12 districts a plan for technology change. Its main point is timing. Districts should define the problem, the success measure and staff workload before procurement, then run rollouts through change champions and a council that reviews significant technology changes.

  • 01CoSN’s toolkit pushes planning before procurement: define the problem, affected groups, timeline, and success measures, and account for competing initiatives and implementation fatigue.
  • 02The toolkit urges leaders to account for competing initiatives and implementation fatigue before procurement or a districtwide rollout.
  • 03After launch, districts should track adoption indicators, review feedback and help requests, keep refresher training going, and conduct a post-implementation review.

Oct 2, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512