Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesRetail

Open questions in agentic commerce extend beyond the AI model

Agentic commerce raises questions beyond an agent’s ability to compare prices: what an agent is permitted to do, who is responsible when an agent-initiated purchase goes wrong, and how machine-initiated transactions move safely across merchants, banks and payment networks. Mastercard's Sabrina Tharani frames the shift as a new interface for commerce rather than a separate channel.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Retail teams put it to work with Sales Enablement.

By MarketScale Newsroom · MastercardAgentic CommerceAi AgentsPayments
Share
Listen to the audio brief

Key facts, context, and what it means.

AUDIO
0:00—

Key takeaways

01

Agentic commerce now turns on three questions the AI can't answer for itself: what the agent may do, who is responsible when it errs, and how its transaction moves between merchant, bank and network.

Free workspace

Turn your Retail expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Tharani framed the change as a new way for people to engage and interact with commerce, an interface shift rather than a separate channel. That distinction could matter to whoever owns checkout. A new channel can operate in a lane of its own. A change in interface reaches into the checkout experience a merchant already gives its customers.

Three questions no model can settle

PYMNTS points to questions the systems around the AI still have to answer. None of them is about whether an agent is smart enough to compare prices:

  • What is a given agent permitted to do?
  • Who is responsible when an agent-initiated purchase goes wrong?
  • How does a machine-initiated transaction move safely across merchants, banks and payment networks?

Agentic commerce now turns on three questions the AI can't answer for itself: what the agent is allowed to do, who is responsible when it gets something wrong, and how its transaction moves between merchant, bank and network.

Agentic commerce now turns on three questions the AI can't answer for itself: what the agent is allowed to do, who is responsible when it gets something wrong, and how its transaction moves between merchant, bank and network.

This is where the race PYMNTS describes plays out, underneath the chatbot. For operators, that suggests the gaps sit in the systems a machine-initiated transaction moves through, across merchants, banks and payment networks, more than in the model itself.

Small, repeat baskets go first

Before switching on agent checkout for low-value, frequent purchases, ask your payments partners two things: how do they determine what an agent is allowed to buy, and who is responsible when something goes wrong?

Building agents still has rough spots

A preprint posted to arXiv by researchers at Delft University of Technology and JetBrains Research reaches a similar conclusion. The team assembled a Stack Overflow corpus focused on agents, made up of 3,191 unique questions that have accepted answers. They also examined failure reports filed in the GitHub issue trackers of popular agent frameworks, then grouped their findings into five broad families of major agent challenges. Interaction contracts between models and tools make up one of those families. According to the study, problems that get a lot of discussion, like installation and prompting, usually get fixed faster. Problems tied to retrieval and orchestration are harder to spot and more complex, and on GitHub they tend to stick around as an ongoing maintenance burden.

Mastercard's 22-company bet

Tharani said Mastercard has announced a 22-company agentic commerce and services cohort through Start Path.

That cohort is the next thing to watch.

Featured companies

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Retail starts with a company putting its merchandising leads, store operations teams, and category managers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Category buyers trust operators, so your merchandising leads shorten the distance between first search and first call.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale NewsroomEditorial Team, MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

B2B Weekly

The week in Retail, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Retail: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Retail buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Retail expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your merchandising leads, store operations teams, and category managers into the articles, video, and social content Retail buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Retail Insights

Grocers matching store prices on Instacart grew 10 points faster, Instacart says

Grocers matching store prices on Instacart grew 10 points faster, Instacart says

Instacart says it named five grocers as "among" this year’s no-markup adopters, including Grocery Outlet. Using its internal data through Q2 2026, Instacart reports no-markup retailers grew 10 percentage points faster than those charging a markup. Participating grocers also get placement in a dedicated in-app "no markups" tab.

  • 01On Instacart, matching store prices earns a yellow banner and placement in a filtered "no markups" tab; Instacart’s internal data through Q2 2026 shows no-markup retailers grew 10 percentage points faster than those charging a markup.
  • 02The 10-point gap compares grocers that chose parity with grocers that didn't, so it can't separate the effect of pricing from the kind of retailer that opts in first. The sharper question is how retailers with similar baskets fared before and after they switched.
  • 03Parity covers item prices only. Service fees still apply, so the app price-to-shelf-tag comparison evens out while convenience charges remain their own line on the receipt.

Sep 26, 2026

Suja's CEO says wellness drinks win in produce, not center store

Suja's CEO says wellness drinks win in produce, not center store

Suja Life CEO Maria Stipp argues better-for-you beverages win or lose based on store placement, with the produce department offering an advantage over crowded center aisles by signaling freshness alongside organic produce. She pairs this with packaging guardrails around organic, low sugar and function, plus a commitment of roughly 10% of net revenue to full-funnel marketing aimed at building trust.

  • 01Suja’s cold-pressed, HPP-treated juices can move from partner farms to shelf in eight days, a cadence Stipp says matches how produce buyers operate.
  • 02Average retailers carry only low-teens SKUs even as Suja reaches 37,000 retailers and 400,000+ distribution points; Stipp says closing the SKU gap in existing accounts is a bigger growth priority than chasing new logos
  • 03Suja allocates roughly 10% of net revenue to full-funnel marketing—unusual in the next-gen category—to drive awareness and conversion through omnichannel tools

Sep 23, 2026

Deloitte: Holiday e-commerce to reach up to $319B in 2026–27

Deloitte: Holiday e-commerce to reach up to $319B in 2026–27

Deloitte forecasts U.S. holiday e-commerce of $316.1 billion to $318.9 billion for November 2026 through January 2027, up 7.5% to 8.4%. Total retail is projected to grow 4% to 4.8% to about $1.7 trillion. The faster online growth rate is a planning input for fulfillment staffing and site readiness.

  • 01Last season's total holiday sales grew 4.1% by Census Bureau count, above the 2.9% to 3.4% range Deloitte had forecast in fall 2025.
  • 02Deloitte's 2025 survey found 33% of U.S. consumers expected to use generative AI somewhere in their holiday shopping; product data quality now matters for machine readers as well as human ones.
  • 03Adobe's and Salesforce's holiday projections landed in late September and October last year, so the next two to six weeks should bring corroborating or conflicting numbers to plan against.

Sep 18, 2026

Explore More Retail Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Retail.

Browse Retail Hub

About the Expert

MarketScale Newsroom
MarketScale Newsroom

Editorial Team

MarketScale

The MarketScale Newsroom reports on the companies, technologies, and trends shaping 16 B2B industries. It turns primary sources and expert commentary into clear, useful coverage for the people doing the work.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Retail and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512