Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesBusiness Services

Expert Compares SpaceX and Bezos’ Blue Origin Space Race to the Tortoise and the Hare

Brad Stone, the author of “Amazon Unbound“, compares Elon Musk’s SpaceX to Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin — referring to them as the tortoise and the hare. But what else separates the two intergalactic competitors? Who will eventually win the space race? Watch below for more. Host: It’s hard to believe that Blue Origin is actually…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Business Services teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Business Services?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Business Services coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Brad Stone, the author of “Amazon Unbound“, compares Elon Musk’s SpaceX to Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin — referring to them as the tortoise and the hare. But what else separates the two intergalactic competitors? Who will eventually win the space race? Watch below for more.

Host: It’s hard to believe that Blue Origin is actually more than 20 years old and now they’re just getting to their first human launch, but how is Blue Origin different from SpaceX? And how is Elon Musk different from Jeff Bezos?

Stone: It’s incredible. In the empire of accomplishment, Blue Origin for Jeff Bezos is kind of, you know, the tarnished jewel, at least right now.

Host: The ugly stepchild?

Stone: Or let me put it. Let me use the word, the metaphor they use. It’s the tortoise and not the hare.

He always wanted to go slow. He wanted to constrain the investment. He wanted to keep the team small, and he wanted to move step by step.

And so suborbital or the edge of space and bringing tourists. There was going to be the first step. And then they would get to orbit and then they would go to the moon.

And what happened was the hare came along. Elon comes along, finances it with venture capital and then government contracts and gets all the glory. And they do quite well.

And I think Bezos has a fair amount of I don’t know if jealousy is the right word, but curiosity that here Elon is getting paid by the government to launch and he is still funding Blue Origin to the tune of a billion in Amazon stock every year. And so we’ve seen Bezos accelerate blue origin’s timetable, its ambitions, its timeline, and see it a little bit of dysfunction over the past few years. And so far, there hasn’t been a lot to show for it.

*Bloomberg contributed to this content

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @MarketScale

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Video TranscriptExpand ↓

Hard to believe that Blue Origin is actually more than 20 years old and now they're just getting to their first human launch, but how is Blue Origin different from space? And how is Elon Musk different from Jeff bezos? It's incredible. In the empire of accomplishment, Blue Origin for Jeff Bezos is kind of, you know, the tarnished jewel, at least right now, the ugly stepchild. Or let me put it. Let me use the word, the metaphor they use. It's the tortoise and not the hair. He always wanted to go slow. He wanted to constrain the investment. He wanted to keep the team small, and he wanted to move step by step. And so suborbital or the edge of space and bringing tourists. There was going to be the first step. And then they would get to orbit and then they would go to the moon. And what happened was the hare came along. Elon comes along, finances it with venture capital and then government contracts and gets all the glory. And they do quite well. And I think Bezos has a fair amount of I don't know if jealousy is the right word, but curiosity that here Elon is getting paid by the government to launch and he is still funding Blue Origin to the tune of a billion in Amazon stock every year. And so we've seen Bezos accelerate blue origin's timetable, its ambitions, its timeline, and see it a little bit of dysfunction over the past few years. And so far, there hasn't been a lot to show for it.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Business Services starts with a company putting its consultants, practice leads, and account teams on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Clients hire the firm whose thinking they have already read, which means fewer cold conversations for your partners.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Business Services Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Business Services: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Business Services buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Business Services expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your consultants, practice leads, and account teams into the articles, video, and social content Business Services buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Business Services Insights

Only 18% track AI ROI, even as agentic AI rolls into professional services

AI use is widespread in professional services, but ROI tracking is rare. Thomson Reuters Institute puts organization-wide AI use at 40% in 2026, while only 18% track ROI. Deloitte Insights says mature governance for autonomous AI agents exists at only about one in five companies.

  • 01The new bottleneck is measurement: Thomson Reuters Institute puts AI ROI tracking at 18%, while Deloitte finds revenue impact is still reported by 20% of organizations.
  • 02Outside-firm AI terms are turning into a procurement artifact: Thomson Reuters Institute reports many clients want AI used, yet fewer than one-third know if their firms actually use it.
  • 03Agentic AI is moving faster than guardrails: Thomson Reuters Institute measures 15% adoption in professional services, and Deloitte expects broader use while only one in five has mature agent governance.

Sep 5, 2026

CRO hiring accelerated in Q1 2026, according to LinkedIn

CRO hiring accelerated in Q1 2026, according to LinkedIn

LinkedIn’s Q1 2026 “CROs on the Move” review described a “significant acceleration” in Chief Revenue Officer appointments. CNBC’s Q1 Housing Market Survey said buyers were more concerned about the economy and mortgage rates than home prices, according to respondents.

  • 01LinkedIn described a “significant acceleration” in CRO appointments in Q1 2026.
  • 02CNBC’s Q1 Housing Market Survey said buyers were more concerned about the economy and mortgage rates than home prices, according to respondents.
  • 03For housing-adjacent sellers, a rate-driven pullback can freeze discretionary decisions, and if it persists it should change how pipeline risk is modelled, showing up first in late-stage conversion and forecast accuracy.

Sep 5, 2026

Apollo’s €3bn Bayer deal shows ‘non-control’ financing is spreading to operators

Apollo’s €3bn Bayer deal shows ‘non-control’ financing is spreading to operators

Apollo-managed funds committed €3 billion to a Bayer entity holding its LARC business, with Bayer keeping majority ownership and operational control. CNBC and Reuters reporting suggests the same “non-control capital” structure is moving into AI compute financing and corporate balance-sheet needs. For operators, the change shows up in supplier funding, contract terms, and who holds approval rights on expansion plans.

  • 01Minority, non-controlling capital is becoming a mainstream option for funding ring-fenced businesses without changing who runs operations, as shown by Apollo’s €3bn Bayer structure (Reuters).
  • 02Large AI compute buildouts are now being packaged as financing problems at the same scale as marquee M&A, with CNBC citing a $35bn Broadcom-related financing led by Apollo.
  • 03If a critical supplier's expansion is funded by private credit or minority structured equity, procurement teams should review change-of-control, assignment, and audit clauses and expect added constraints and diligence, even when day-to-day operations stay put.

Sep 5, 2026

Explore More Business Services Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Business Services.

Browse Business Services Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Business Services and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512