Skip to content
Contributors›Elizabeth Venafro
EV

Fractional CMO · RSK

Elizabeth Venafro

3 articles
Contributor Brief·Elizabeth Venafro · 3 articles
Updated Nov 6, 2026

Revenue loss hides in paid claims, not denied ones

Venafro argues that healthcare revenue leakage is systematically invisible because underpaid claims post as completed transactions, while denied claims trigger visible workflows that demand resolution. The real financial risk lies not in claims that get rejected, but in claims that get paid below contract terms yet close without escalation.

3

claim scenarios that appear correct but aren't

“A denied claim gets a queue. A paid claim that came in lower than expected gets none of that.”

Denials get a queue, underpayments just look like paid claims

Three payment scenarios and their visibility in revenue cycle workflows

Denied claim10
Underpaid but closed claim1
Zero-paid contract line (misidentified as underpayment)3

SHARE

71%Denied claim
Denied claim
Underpaid but closed claim
Zero-paid contract line (misidentified as underpayment)

1 in 1

orthopedic claims coded correctly yet underpaid per contract

A zero payment on a claim line can look like missing revenue. It isn't.

A zero-paid claim line is not automatically an underpayment

Both claims were handled correctly. That still doesn't mean the practice got paid what its contract says.

A clean, paid, closed claim can still be short of the contract

“Paid claims post, and the day moves on.”

Themes:Revenue leakage through normalized underpaymentVisibility asymmetry between denials and underpaymentsContract compliance gaps in correctly-processed claims

What is MarketScale

These experts publish through MarketScale, a content platform that turns industry knowledge into articles, video, and audience. Want the same for your team?