# AI cuts cardiologists' echocardiogram review time by 46%

By MarketScale Newsroom · Published 2026-11-09 · Healthcare on MarketScale
Canonical: https://www.marketscale.com/industries/healthcare/ai-echocardiogram-reports-cut-cardiologist-review-time-aha-2026

> Research presented at AHA Scientific Sessions 2026 found AI-drafted echocardiogram reports were comparable to human drafts, and cardiologists averaged 4.6 minutes reviewing them versus 8.5 minutes without AI.

## Key points

- Cardiologists averaged 4.6 minutes finalizing AI-drafted echo reports versus 8.5 minutes without AI, about 46% less time.
- Cardiologists made substantial changes to 50.6% of AI drafts and 49.7% of human drafts.
- The research used 1,200 echocardiograms from 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California medical centers.

Preliminary echocardiogram reports drafted by an AI tool were comparable in accuracy to reports drafted by sonographers and cardiologists and cut the time cardiologists spent finalizing them by about 46%, according to late-breaking research presented November 9 at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2026 in Chicago.

Cardiologists averaged 4.6 minutes per echocardiogram when reviewing and finalizing AI-generated preliminary interpretations, compared with 8.5 minutes without AI assistance, the American Heart Association said in its release.

## How the trial worked

The researchers used 1,200 transthoracic echocardiograms performed over two weeks in March 2025 at 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California medical centers. For each exam, the AI tool, a sonographer and a cardiologist each prepared a preliminary report. Those reports were randomly assigned to cardiologists, who reviewed and finalized them without knowing the source. Nine sonographers and 20 cardiologists took part.

Cardiologists made substantial changes to 50.6% of the AI-generated preliminary interpretations and 49.7% of the human-generated ones, meeting the study's non-inferiority goal, according to the release. Final reports based on AI drafts also agreed more often with historical reports in patients' medical records. Healio reported that reviewing cardiologists could not tell whether a draft came from AI, a sonographer or a cardiologist.

Co-senior author Keane K. Lee, M.D., M.S., a cardiologist at Kaiser Permanente Santa Clara Homestead Medical Center, said in the release that "what surprised us was the extent to which using AI-generated reports reduced the time cardiologists needed to interpret echocardiograms."

> AI cannot, however, replace the human team. — Keane K. Lee, M.D., M.S., Kaiser Permanente Santa Clara Homestead Medical Center

## Limitations

The study did not test long-term patient outcomes, and cardiologists knew they were participating, which may have changed their usual work patterns, the AHA said. The findings are a research abstract that has not been peer-reviewed, and the researchers said more study is needed in real-world, higher-volume settings.

## Sources

- [AI-interpreted echocardiograms comparable to human reports, cardiologists' time cut by about 50%](https://newsroom.heart.org/news/ai-interpreted-echocardiograms-comparable-to-human-reports-cardiologists-time-cut-by-about-50) (American Heart Association)
- [AI-interpreted echocardiograms comparable to human reports, may halve reading time](https://www.healio.com/news/cardiology/20261109/aiinterpreted-echocardiograms-comparable-to-human-reports-may-halve-reading-time) (Healio)

Tags: healthcare AI, cardiology, medical imaging, Kaiser Permanente, clinical workflow

---
Source: MarketScale, https://www.marketscale.com/industries/healthcare/ai-echocardiogram-reports-cut-cardiologist-review-time-aha-2026. Published for AI indexing and citation; cite the canonical URL. Site guide for agents: https://www.marketscale.com/llms.txt